'The laws of the phenomena of society.' How would Weber and Durkheim have responded to John Stuart Mill's famous quote?

Compare and contrast how Weber and Durkheim might have responded to this statement.

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Education & Teaching
Cover of the book 'The laws of the phenomena of society.' How would Weber and Durkheim have responded to John Stuart Mill's famous quote? by Johannes Lenhard, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Johannes Lenhard ISBN: 9783656323808
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: November 28, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: German
Author: Johannes Lenhard
ISBN: 9783656323808
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: November 28, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: German

Essay aus dem Jahr 2012 im Fachbereich Pädagogik - Wissenschaft, Theorie, Anthropologie, Note: 66, University of Cambridge, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: 'The Laws of the phenomena of society are, and can be, nothing but the laws of the actions and passions of human beings . . . Men are not, when brought together, converted into another kind of substance' (John Stuart Mill). Compare and contrast how Weber and Durkheim might have responded to this statement. What John Stuart Mill means seems straightforward: society functions as a unidirectional interplay of individuals. The rules, that govern those individuals in isolation also dominate in situations of collective character. Mill expresses a deep belief in the overarching importance of the individual in comparison to collectives that in turn do not change the actor's behaviour. When we place Mill in his liberal and utilitarian context, this opinion does not surprise; for him, self-interest seemed to rule both the individual and society. To put it crudely: individual > society. Contrasting the 'laws of the phenomena of society' with 'the laws of the actions and passions of human beings', the main difference lies in the society-individual dichotomy, i.e. the level of analysis. The former refers to situations in which more than one actor participates, such as religion, economy or administration. The latter alludes to the personal behaviour, feelings and ideas of a human being, almost to psychology. Without questioning this dichotomy in its foundation , both Weber and Durkheim, differ widely from the view that both spheres of law are approximately congruent. For both scholars, society has a life on its own, rules on its own that are at least partly independent from the individual. Durkheim much more than Weber even ascribes an influence to society that is able to dominate the individual behaviour. For Weber, the overarching force of capitalist society is a particular condition in modern society that he reveals and criticises. The laws of the individual are not without importance in his scheme - but need to be strengthened. Let me introduce his thesis in more detail in the following paragraphs.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay aus dem Jahr 2012 im Fachbereich Pädagogik - Wissenschaft, Theorie, Anthropologie, Note: 66, University of Cambridge, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: 'The Laws of the phenomena of society are, and can be, nothing but the laws of the actions and passions of human beings . . . Men are not, when brought together, converted into another kind of substance' (John Stuart Mill). Compare and contrast how Weber and Durkheim might have responded to this statement. What John Stuart Mill means seems straightforward: society functions as a unidirectional interplay of individuals. The rules, that govern those individuals in isolation also dominate in situations of collective character. Mill expresses a deep belief in the overarching importance of the individual in comparison to collectives that in turn do not change the actor's behaviour. When we place Mill in his liberal and utilitarian context, this opinion does not surprise; for him, self-interest seemed to rule both the individual and society. To put it crudely: individual > society. Contrasting the 'laws of the phenomena of society' with 'the laws of the actions and passions of human beings', the main difference lies in the society-individual dichotomy, i.e. the level of analysis. The former refers to situations in which more than one actor participates, such as religion, economy or administration. The latter alludes to the personal behaviour, feelings and ideas of a human being, almost to psychology. Without questioning this dichotomy in its foundation , both Weber and Durkheim, differ widely from the view that both spheres of law are approximately congruent. For both scholars, society has a life on its own, rules on its own that are at least partly independent from the individual. Durkheim much more than Weber even ascribes an influence to society that is able to dominate the individual behaviour. For Weber, the overarching force of capitalist society is a particular condition in modern society that he reveals and criticises. The laws of the individual are not without importance in his scheme - but need to be strengthened. Let me introduce his thesis in more detail in the following paragraphs.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Wo ist die Kultur geblieben? by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Packung und Verpackung by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Die Auswirkungen der Unternehmensteuerreform 2008 auf den § 7g EStG by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Der Hof des Hochmeisters in Preußen by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Die Deutung des Akvarium-Songs ????? ? ???? als Perestroika-Hymne by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Nietzsche - Die Tugend und die Tugenden im 'Zarathustra' by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Complementary Innovation in Platform-Centric Ecosystems. An Entegrated View by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Stereotypes of Chicanos in the US by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book The Various Roles of the Teacher in the English Classroom by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Kopernikanische Wende im abendländischen Menschenbild? by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Medienrecht im Schnelldurchlauf by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Die Kolonialpolitik von Carl Peters und ihre Folgen auf den Maji-Maji-Krieg by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Vom Finanziellen zum Rebellischen zum Geselligen by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Die historische Kontroverse um die Verantwortung am Ausbruch des Ersten Weltkriegs by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book 'Was ist geschehen?' Einen Bericht schreiben (Deutsch, Klasse 6) by Johannes Lenhard
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy