'The laws of the phenomena of society.' How would Weber and Durkheim have responded to John Stuart Mill's famous quote?

Compare and contrast how Weber and Durkheim might have responded to this statement.

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Education & Teaching
Cover of the book 'The laws of the phenomena of society.' How would Weber and Durkheim have responded to John Stuart Mill's famous quote? by Johannes Lenhard, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Johannes Lenhard ISBN: 9783656323808
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: November 28, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: German
Author: Johannes Lenhard
ISBN: 9783656323808
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: November 28, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: German

Essay aus dem Jahr 2012 im Fachbereich Pädagogik - Wissenschaft, Theorie, Anthropologie, Note: 66, University of Cambridge, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: 'The Laws of the phenomena of society are, and can be, nothing but the laws of the actions and passions of human beings . . . Men are not, when brought together, converted into another kind of substance' (John Stuart Mill). Compare and contrast how Weber and Durkheim might have responded to this statement. What John Stuart Mill means seems straightforward: society functions as a unidirectional interplay of individuals. The rules, that govern those individuals in isolation also dominate in situations of collective character. Mill expresses a deep belief in the overarching importance of the individual in comparison to collectives that in turn do not change the actor's behaviour. When we place Mill in his liberal and utilitarian context, this opinion does not surprise; for him, self-interest seemed to rule both the individual and society. To put it crudely: individual > society. Contrasting the 'laws of the phenomena of society' with 'the laws of the actions and passions of human beings', the main difference lies in the society-individual dichotomy, i.e. the level of analysis. The former refers to situations in which more than one actor participates, such as religion, economy or administration. The latter alludes to the personal behaviour, feelings and ideas of a human being, almost to psychology. Without questioning this dichotomy in its foundation , both Weber and Durkheim, differ widely from the view that both spheres of law are approximately congruent. For both scholars, society has a life on its own, rules on its own that are at least partly independent from the individual. Durkheim much more than Weber even ascribes an influence to society that is able to dominate the individual behaviour. For Weber, the overarching force of capitalist society is a particular condition in modern society that he reveals and criticises. The laws of the individual are not without importance in his scheme - but need to be strengthened. Let me introduce his thesis in more detail in the following paragraphs.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay aus dem Jahr 2012 im Fachbereich Pädagogik - Wissenschaft, Theorie, Anthropologie, Note: 66, University of Cambridge, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: 'The Laws of the phenomena of society are, and can be, nothing but the laws of the actions and passions of human beings . . . Men are not, when brought together, converted into another kind of substance' (John Stuart Mill). Compare and contrast how Weber and Durkheim might have responded to this statement. What John Stuart Mill means seems straightforward: society functions as a unidirectional interplay of individuals. The rules, that govern those individuals in isolation also dominate in situations of collective character. Mill expresses a deep belief in the overarching importance of the individual in comparison to collectives that in turn do not change the actor's behaviour. When we place Mill in his liberal and utilitarian context, this opinion does not surprise; for him, self-interest seemed to rule both the individual and society. To put it crudely: individual > society. Contrasting the 'laws of the phenomena of society' with 'the laws of the actions and passions of human beings', the main difference lies in the society-individual dichotomy, i.e. the level of analysis. The former refers to situations in which more than one actor participates, such as religion, economy or administration. The latter alludes to the personal behaviour, feelings and ideas of a human being, almost to psychology. Without questioning this dichotomy in its foundation , both Weber and Durkheim, differ widely from the view that both spheres of law are approximately congruent. For both scholars, society has a life on its own, rules on its own that are at least partly independent from the individual. Durkheim much more than Weber even ascribes an influence to society that is able to dominate the individual behaviour. For Weber, the overarching force of capitalist society is a particular condition in modern society that he reveals and criticises. The laws of the individual are not without importance in his scheme - but need to be strengthened. Let me introduce his thesis in more detail in the following paragraphs.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Welchem Wandel ist der Parteienwettbewerb in Großbritannien unterworfen? by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Die Bedeutung der pädagogischen Beziehung im Nationalsozialismus by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Islamism, a threat for the West? by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Design science in management research by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Eltern und Schule als Einflussfaktoren für das typische Berufswahlverhalten von Mädchen bzw. jungen Frauen by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Verfahren der konstruktionsbegleitenden Kostenschätzung und Kalkulation by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Wie funktioniert eigentlich JPEG? by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Sozialräumliche Polarisierung. Das Segregationsproblem in Sao Paulo by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Die Arbeitnehmerfreizügigkeit in der Rechtsprechung des EuGH by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Public Enterprises in Nigeria. A critical evaluation of their performance by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Informations-, Meinungs- und Medienfreiheit by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Kulturföderalismus - Die Rolle des Bundes bei der Kulturförderung by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Steuerung mit belastungsorientierter Auftragsfreigabe by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Affirmative Action in Südafrika by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Arbeitsanleitung zur Erstellung eines Projektabschlussberichtes by Johannes Lenhard
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy