Across the Boundaries

Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Biological Sciences, Biology, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book Across the Boundaries by Daniel Steel, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Daniel Steel ISBN: 9780190450243
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: November 26, 2007
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Daniel Steel
ISBN: 9780190450243
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: November 26, 2007
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

The biological and social sciences often generalize causal conclusions from one context or location to others that may differ in some relevant respects, as is illustrated by inferences from animal models to humans or from a pilot study to a broader population. Inferences like these are known as extrapolations. The question of how and when extrapolation can be legitimate is a fundamental issue for the biological and social sciences that has not received the attention it deserves. In Across the Boundaries, Steel argues that previous accounts of extrapolation are inadequate and proposes a better approach that is able to answer methodological critiques of extrapolation from animal models to humans. Across the Boundaries develops the thought that knowledge of mechanisms linking cause to effect can serve as a basis for extrapolation. Despite its intuitive appeal, this idea faces several obstacles. Extrapolation is worthwhile only when there are stringent practical or ethical limitations on what can be learned about the target (say, human) population by studying it directly. Meanwhile, the mechanisms approach rests on the idea that extrapolation is justified when mechanisms are the same or similar enough. Yet since mechanisms may differ significantly between model and target, it needs to be explained how the suitability of the model could be established given only very limited information about the target. Moreover, since model and target are rarely alike in all relevant respects, an adequate account of extrapolation must also explain how extrapolation can be legitimate even when some causally relevant differences are present. Steel explains how his proposal can answer these challenges, illustrates his account with a detailed biological case study, and explores its implications for such traditional philosophy of science topics ceteris paribus laws and reductionism. Finally, he considers whether mechanisms-based extrapolation can work in social science.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The biological and social sciences often generalize causal conclusions from one context or location to others that may differ in some relevant respects, as is illustrated by inferences from animal models to humans or from a pilot study to a broader population. Inferences like these are known as extrapolations. The question of how and when extrapolation can be legitimate is a fundamental issue for the biological and social sciences that has not received the attention it deserves. In Across the Boundaries, Steel argues that previous accounts of extrapolation are inadequate and proposes a better approach that is able to answer methodological critiques of extrapolation from animal models to humans. Across the Boundaries develops the thought that knowledge of mechanisms linking cause to effect can serve as a basis for extrapolation. Despite its intuitive appeal, this idea faces several obstacles. Extrapolation is worthwhile only when there are stringent practical or ethical limitations on what can be learned about the target (say, human) population by studying it directly. Meanwhile, the mechanisms approach rests on the idea that extrapolation is justified when mechanisms are the same or similar enough. Yet since mechanisms may differ significantly between model and target, it needs to be explained how the suitability of the model could be established given only very limited information about the target. Moreover, since model and target are rarely alike in all relevant respects, an adequate account of extrapolation must also explain how extrapolation can be legitimate even when some causally relevant differences are present. Steel explains how his proposal can answer these challenges, illustrates his account with a detailed biological case study, and explores its implications for such traditional philosophy of science topics ceteris paribus laws and reductionism. Finally, he considers whether mechanisms-based extrapolation can work in social science.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Can Animals Be Persons? by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book The Literary Imagination in Jewish Antiquity by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book The Mind within the Brain: How We Make Decisions and How those Decisions Go Wrong by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book Quincas Borba by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book Epidemiologic Methods by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book The Double Game by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book The American Slave Narrative and the Victorian Novel by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book News of War by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book Nation-States and the Global Environment by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book Moving Beyond Assessment by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book Garden Spot by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book Media Ownership and Concentration in America by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book Speaking Pittsburghese by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book Comparative International Law by Daniel Steel
Cover of the book Scientology by Daniel Steel
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy