Alternative Dispute Resolution in Patent Disputes

A Worthwhile Alternative to the Current Patent Dispute Between Apple Inc. and SAMSUNG Electronics?

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Business
Cover of the book Alternative Dispute Resolution in Patent Disputes by Anonymous, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Anonymous ISBN: 9783656421849
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: April 29, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Anonymous
ISBN: 9783656421849
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: April 29, 2013
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject Law - Civil / Private / Trade / Anti Trust Law / Business Law, grade: 1,1, Berlin School of Economics and Law, course: Internationalisierung von Wirtschaftsprozessen, language: English, abstract: Major cell phone manufacturers Apple and Samsung are currently accusing one another of infringing patents relating to their smartphones. The lawsuits simultaneously being carried out in several countries across the world are a burden to both companies. Due to the fact that the two stand in a crucial business relationship with each other, an alternative dispute resolution model may be appropriate. Methods such as mediation, arbitration and expert determination may be suitable. Patents are part of intellectual property protection and have grown in importance over the last decades. They protect an invention and can only be granted if certain criteria are met. However, patent holders litigate patent infringements in order to protect their competitive position. Alternative Dispute Resolution offers advantages such as a single procedure, autonomy of the parties, neutrality, finality of awards, confidentiality as well as enforceability, and has been known as a method of resolution since the 1980s. De-spite this, most international disputes are carried out in court, even though companies are aware that a trial is the least beneficial method. In the past, Apple had successfully negotiated patent litigation with several competitors, but initial attempts at Alternative Dispute Resolution have failed in the case of Apple and Samsung. However, it can still be carried next to court to find common ground and identify economic needs and interests that may support court litigation and direct it towards a beneficial outcome for both. In addition, it is advisable to implement an early-stage conflict management model for the future.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject Law - Civil / Private / Trade / Anti Trust Law / Business Law, grade: 1,1, Berlin School of Economics and Law, course: Internationalisierung von Wirtschaftsprozessen, language: English, abstract: Major cell phone manufacturers Apple and Samsung are currently accusing one another of infringing patents relating to their smartphones. The lawsuits simultaneously being carried out in several countries across the world are a burden to both companies. Due to the fact that the two stand in a crucial business relationship with each other, an alternative dispute resolution model may be appropriate. Methods such as mediation, arbitration and expert determination may be suitable. Patents are part of intellectual property protection and have grown in importance over the last decades. They protect an invention and can only be granted if certain criteria are met. However, patent holders litigate patent infringements in order to protect their competitive position. Alternative Dispute Resolution offers advantages such as a single procedure, autonomy of the parties, neutrality, finality of awards, confidentiality as well as enforceability, and has been known as a method of resolution since the 1980s. De-spite this, most international disputes are carried out in court, even though companies are aware that a trial is the least beneficial method. In the past, Apple had successfully negotiated patent litigation with several competitors, but initial attempts at Alternative Dispute Resolution have failed in the case of Apple and Samsung. However, it can still be carried next to court to find common ground and identify economic needs and interests that may support court litigation and direct it towards a beneficial outcome for both. In addition, it is advisable to implement an early-stage conflict management model for the future.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Arbeitsrecht in der Insolvenz. Einschränkung von Arbeitnehmerrechten? by Anonymous
Cover of the book Assessing the Potential of Sponsorship for Marketing Communications of Scottish Charities by Anonymous
Cover of the book ...weil da sollte man einmal genauer hinschauen! by Anonymous
Cover of the book Mediationsverfahren am Fallbeispiel 'Runder Tisch Detmolder Strasse' by Anonymous
Cover of the book Kinder- und Jugendliteratur als neue mediale Sozialisationsform by Anonymous
Cover of the book Störungen des Sozialverhaltens im Kindes- und Jugendalter by Anonymous
Cover of the book Die Migrationsgesellschaft und ihre Funktion für die Soziale Arbeit by Anonymous
Cover of the book Eine empirische Analyse politischer Stellungnahmen zur Fair-Value-Bilanzierung während und im Nachklang der Finanzkrise by Anonymous
Cover of the book Divergenzen zwischen World Banking und Deutschland in der Umweltpolitik by Anonymous
Cover of the book Der Subsidiaritätsbegriff in der katholischen Soziallehre und in den Staatswissenschaften by Anonymous
Cover of the book Kurzfilmanalyse - 'Goodbye' von Steve Hudson by Anonymous
Cover of the book Elterliche Sorge in England - ein Kurzbericht by Anonymous
Cover of the book Hat sich die moderne Gesellschaft von ihren Klassen und Schichten verabschiedet? by Anonymous
Cover of the book Die Integrationspolitik der Adenauer-CDU by Anonymous
Cover of the book Laufkäfer und Nachtfalter by Anonymous
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy