Ambiguity in Shakespeare's History Play 'King Henry V'

Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, British
Cover of the book Ambiguity in Shakespeare's History Play 'King Henry V' by Michael Trinkwalder, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Michael Trinkwalder ISBN: 9783656199274
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: May 25, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Michael Trinkwalder
ISBN: 9783656199274
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: May 25, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2012 in the subject English - Literature, Works, grade: 1,00, Staatliche Berufliche Oberschule Fachoberschule / Berufsoberschule Kaufbeuren, language: English, abstract: 'King Henry V' has always been considered as Shakespeare's most patriotic play, one could even argue his most nationalistic play. 'King Henry V' appears to be the story of the ideal English king who is brave, charismatic, honourable and pious or as Shakespeare puts it, he is 'the mirror of all Christian kings' who fights for what is righteously his and leads his 'band of brothers' to victory against impossible odds. However, to truly understand Shakespeare's motivations, we have to take a look at the tumultuous time in which the play was written. Under the reign of Elizabeth I., England had either been at war or at the constant threat of one for decades. It was a time of frequent conspiracies to overthrow the queen and bloody rebellions. In this context the play can be seen as an attempt to raise the morale and to rally the English around a common cause. This interpretation becomes plausible given the fact that the play's popularity increased whenever England was threatened, for example in both world wars and the Napoleonic wars. Nevertheless 'King Henry V' is not just simple wartime propaganda, it's an ambiguous play which can be interpreted both as a glorification of war or alternatively as a subtle critique of the cruelty and futility of war. It lies entirely in the eye of the beholder. Someone with a patriotic point of view might identify himself with the virtuous Henry or admire that - although weakened by plague and famine - the English soldiers and their king defeats a superior French army, whereas a more critical reader might question the legitimacy of waging a war of aggression in the first place. Furthermore particularly modern readers feel disgusted by the killing of the unarmed prisoners at the battle of Agincourt. Nowadays it would be considered a war crime and even back then it was considered inhumane. On the one hand Shakespeare seems to show the ideal monarch and an English nation united in victory, on the other hand he shows the ugly face of war with all his atrocities and inhumanity. In the following essay I will show both, the patriotic and a more critical perspective and the reason why Shakespeare implemented both of them in his play.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2012 in the subject English - Literature, Works, grade: 1,00, Staatliche Berufliche Oberschule Fachoberschule / Berufsoberschule Kaufbeuren, language: English, abstract: 'King Henry V' has always been considered as Shakespeare's most patriotic play, one could even argue his most nationalistic play. 'King Henry V' appears to be the story of the ideal English king who is brave, charismatic, honourable and pious or as Shakespeare puts it, he is 'the mirror of all Christian kings' who fights for what is righteously his and leads his 'band of brothers' to victory against impossible odds. However, to truly understand Shakespeare's motivations, we have to take a look at the tumultuous time in which the play was written. Under the reign of Elizabeth I., England had either been at war or at the constant threat of one for decades. It was a time of frequent conspiracies to overthrow the queen and bloody rebellions. In this context the play can be seen as an attempt to raise the morale and to rally the English around a common cause. This interpretation becomes plausible given the fact that the play's popularity increased whenever England was threatened, for example in both world wars and the Napoleonic wars. Nevertheless 'King Henry V' is not just simple wartime propaganda, it's an ambiguous play which can be interpreted both as a glorification of war or alternatively as a subtle critique of the cruelty and futility of war. It lies entirely in the eye of the beholder. Someone with a patriotic point of view might identify himself with the virtuous Henry or admire that - although weakened by plague and famine - the English soldiers and their king defeats a superior French army, whereas a more critical reader might question the legitimacy of waging a war of aggression in the first place. Furthermore particularly modern readers feel disgusted by the killing of the unarmed prisoners at the battle of Agincourt. Nowadays it would be considered a war crime and even back then it was considered inhumane. On the one hand Shakespeare seems to show the ideal monarch and an English nation united in victory, on the other hand he shows the ugly face of war with all his atrocities and inhumanity. In the following essay I will show both, the patriotic and a more critical perspective and the reason why Shakespeare implemented both of them in his play.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Why did war break out in Europe in September 1939? by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Vergleich der Entwicklungspsychologien von Piaget und Erikson für den Beruf des Lehrers by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Zahlungssysteme in Webshops by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Epoche Jugendstil: Glas- und Keramikobjekte aus der Sammlung von Heinrich und Marie Strieffler im Städtischen Museum Strieffler-Haus, Landau by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Was zeichnet die adventistische Reformationsbewegung aus? by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Die Genderproblematik bei Computerspielen und die daraus resultierende Bedeutung für das computerbasierte Lernen by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Das Zieldreieck des deutschen Energierechts by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Die Erfolgsquote von Mergers & Acquisitions - Messungen und Studien by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Die Harlem Renaissance - Zora Neale Hurstons Verständnis der afroamerikanischen Identität by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Der Frühparlamentarismus in England unter der Stuart-Dynastie by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Bedeutete das Ende des Bretton Woods Systems einen Machtverlust für die USA? by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Kriegsbetroffene Kinder: Schul- und Sozialpädagogische Interventionen by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Die Bedeutung der Perspektive von Kindern und Jugendlichen für die Einschätzung des Child Well-being der jungen Bevölkerung by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Segregation und Ausgrenzungstendenzen in Städten by Michael Trinkwalder
Cover of the book Die Rolle der Pflegekraft im interdisziplinären Patientenmanagement im Kontext von sozialpolitischen Entwicklungen by Michael Trinkwalder
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy