Animal Cruelty and Freedom of Speech

When Worlds Collide

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, Social Services & Welfare, Reference & Language, Law, Criminal law, Social Science
Cover of the book Animal Cruelty and Freedom of Speech by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood, Purdue University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood ISBN: 9781612493220
Publisher: Purdue University Press Publication: May 15, 2014
Imprint: Purdue University Press Language: English
Author: Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
ISBN: 9781612493220
Publisher: Purdue University Press
Publication: May 15, 2014
Imprint: Purdue University Press
Language: English

A collaboration between an attorney and an animal protection advocate, this work utilizes the extremely controversial and high-profile "crush video" case, US v. Stevens, to explore how American society attempts to balance the protection of free speech and the prevention of animal cruelty. Starting from the detailed case study of a single prominent ruling, the authors provide a masterful survey of important issues facing society in the area of animal welfare. The Stevens case included various "hot topic" elements connected to the role of government as arbiter of public morality, including judicial attitudes to sexual deviance and dogfighting. Because it is one of only two animal rights cases that the US Supreme Court has handled, and the only case discussing the competing interests of free speech and animal cruelty, it will be an important topic for discussion in constitutional and animal law courses for decades to come.The Stevens case arose from the first conviction under 18 USC § 48 (Section 48), a federal law enacted in 1999, which criminalized the creation, sale, and/or possession of certain depictions of animal cruelty. The US Congress intended Section 48 to end the creation and interstate trafficking of depictions of animal cruelty in which animals are abused or even killed for entertainment's sake. Proponents of Section 48 predicted that countless benefits to both humans and animals would flow from its enforcement. Opponents of the law argued that it was too far-reaching and would stifle protected speech. Critics of Section 48 appeared to have prevailed when the US Supreme Court struck the law down as unconstitutionally overbroad. Although a law tailored to address the Supreme Court's concerns was quickly enacted, the free speech/animal cruelty controversy is far from over.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

A collaboration between an attorney and an animal protection advocate, this work utilizes the extremely controversial and high-profile "crush video" case, US v. Stevens, to explore how American society attempts to balance the protection of free speech and the prevention of animal cruelty. Starting from the detailed case study of a single prominent ruling, the authors provide a masterful survey of important issues facing society in the area of animal welfare. The Stevens case included various "hot topic" elements connected to the role of government as arbiter of public morality, including judicial attitudes to sexual deviance and dogfighting. Because it is one of only two animal rights cases that the US Supreme Court has handled, and the only case discussing the competing interests of free speech and animal cruelty, it will be an important topic for discussion in constitutional and animal law courses for decades to come.The Stevens case arose from the first conviction under 18 USC § 48 (Section 48), a federal law enacted in 1999, which criminalized the creation, sale, and/or possession of certain depictions of animal cruelty. The US Congress intended Section 48 to end the creation and interstate trafficking of depictions of animal cruelty in which animals are abused or even killed for entertainment's sake. Proponents of Section 48 predicted that countless benefits to both humans and animals would flow from its enforcement. Opponents of the law argued that it was too far-reaching and would stifle protected speech. Critics of Section 48 appeared to have prevailed when the US Supreme Court struck the law down as unconstitutionally overbroad. Although a law tailored to address the Supreme Court's concerns was quickly enacted, the free speech/animal cruelty controversy is far from over.

More books from Purdue University Press

Cover of the book Women’s Tanci Fiction in Late Imperial and Early Twentieth-Century China by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book Your Ideal Cat by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book Roll with the Times, or the Times Roll Over You by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book The Midwest Farmer’s Daughter by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book Veterinary Medical School Admission Requirements (VMSAR) by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book Twenty Years with the Jewish Labor Bund by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book At Wit’s End by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book Apple of Discord by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book Knowing Subjects by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book Flying the Beam by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book Slow Ball Cartoonist by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book Navigating Diversity and Inclusion in Veterinary Medicine by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book Reimagining Reference in the 21st Century by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book Reframing Italy by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
Cover of the book El intelectual y la cultura de masas by Abigail Perdue, Randall Lockwood
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy