Answering the Call of the Court

How Justices and Litigants Set the Supreme Court Agenda

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory
Cover of the book Answering the Call of the Court by Vanessa A. Baird, University of Virginia Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Vanessa A. Baird ISBN: 9780813930442
Publisher: University of Virginia Press Publication: August 13, 2008
Imprint: University of Virginia Press Language: English
Author: Vanessa A. Baird
ISBN: 9780813930442
Publisher: University of Virginia Press
Publication: August 13, 2008
Imprint: University of Virginia Press
Language: English

The U.S. Supreme Court is the quintessential example of a court that expanded its agenda into policy areas that were once reserved for legislatures. Yet scholars know very little about what causes attention to various policy areas to ebb and flow on the Supreme Court’s agenda. Vanessa A. Baird’s Answering the Call of the Court: How Justices and Litigants Set the Supreme Court Agenda represents the first scholarly attempt to connect justices’ priorities, litigants’ strategies, and aggregate policy outputs of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Most previous studies on the Supreme Court’s agenda examine case selection, but Baird demonstrates that the agenda-setting process begins long before justices choose which cases they will hear. When justices signal their interest in a particular policy area, litigants respond by sponsoring well-crafted cases in those policy areas. Approximately four to five years later, the Supreme Court’s agenda in those areas expands, with cases that are comparatively more politically important and divisive than other cases the Court hears. From issues of discrimination and free expression to welfare policy, from immigration to economic regulation, strategic supporters of litigation pay attention to the goals of Supreme Court justices and bring cases they can use to achieve those goals.

Since policy making in courts is iterative, multiple well-crafted cases are needed for courts to make comprehensive policy. Baird argues that judicial policy-making power depends on the actions of policy entrepreneurs or other litigants who systematically respond to the priorities and preferences of Supreme Court justices.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The U.S. Supreme Court is the quintessential example of a court that expanded its agenda into policy areas that were once reserved for legislatures. Yet scholars know very little about what causes attention to various policy areas to ebb and flow on the Supreme Court’s agenda. Vanessa A. Baird’s Answering the Call of the Court: How Justices and Litigants Set the Supreme Court Agenda represents the first scholarly attempt to connect justices’ priorities, litigants’ strategies, and aggregate policy outputs of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Most previous studies on the Supreme Court’s agenda examine case selection, but Baird demonstrates that the agenda-setting process begins long before justices choose which cases they will hear. When justices signal their interest in a particular policy area, litigants respond by sponsoring well-crafted cases in those policy areas. Approximately four to five years later, the Supreme Court’s agenda in those areas expands, with cases that are comparatively more politically important and divisive than other cases the Court hears. From issues of discrimination and free expression to welfare policy, from immigration to economic regulation, strategic supporters of litigation pay attention to the goals of Supreme Court justices and bring cases they can use to achieve those goals.

Since policy making in courts is iterative, multiple well-crafted cases are needed for courts to make comprehensive policy. Baird argues that judicial policy-making power depends on the actions of policy entrepreneurs or other litigants who systematically respond to the priorities and preferences of Supreme Court justices.

More books from University of Virginia Press

Cover of the book Voters' Verdicts by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book Prophetic Remembrance by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book Patriotism and Piety by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book Practicing Democracy by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book Institutional Games and the U.S. Supreme Court by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book Freedom Has a Face by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book Hidden History by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book The Law School at the University of Virginia by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book The Equality of Believers by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book The Flirt's Tragedy by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book The Fury and Cries of Women by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book The Punitive Turn by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book The Haverford Discussions by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book Emily Davies by Vanessa A. Baird
Cover of the book Be It Ever So Humble by Vanessa A. Baird
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy