Anzio (Operation Shingle): An Operational Perspective

Nonfiction, History, Germany, European General, Military, United States
Cover of the book Anzio (Operation Shingle): An Operational Perspective by Captain Stephen P. Gray, Lucknow Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Captain Stephen P. Gray ISBN: 9781782897262
Publisher: Lucknow Books Publication: August 15, 2014
Imprint: Lucknow Books Language: English
Author: Captain Stephen P. Gray
ISBN: 9781782897262
Publisher: Lucknow Books
Publication: August 15, 2014
Imprint: Lucknow Books
Language: English

This case study analyzes the role of operational art in Allied operations at Anzio, Italy and the battle for Rome (January 22-June 4, 1944). As part of the Allied Campaign in Italy, the amphibious assault on Anzio-code-named Operation Shingle, and the subsequent drive to Rome remains one of the most controversial military operations in history. Although the Allies eventually captured Rome from the Germans, the failure to use 'operational thinking' led to a poorly planned and executed operation.
Most historical accounts blame the failures at Anzio on the lack of aggressiveness by the Operation Shingle commander Major General John P. Lucas. However, when viewed in the larger context of the strategy to defeat Germany and the Allied Campaign in Italy, Operation Shingle is a showcase of failure at the operational level of war. Political rather than military considerations drove Shingle-dooming the operation from the start.
Anzio demonstrates the importance of linking tactical actions to operational and strategic objectives. At the strategic level of war, the Allies had a sound strategy to defeat Germany. However, at the operational level of war, the decision to launch Shingle did not adequately assess risk. In operational design, commanders failed to define an objective, lacked sufficient mass, and did not include alternative plans based on potential enemy actions. During planning and preparation, the Allies misjudged the enemy's center of gravity and failed to exploit valuable intelligence. During execution, operational leadership lacked initiative. Finally, the complexity and tensions created by the combined operation made unity of effort difficult. These lessons should benefit future operations.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This case study analyzes the role of operational art in Allied operations at Anzio, Italy and the battle for Rome (January 22-June 4, 1944). As part of the Allied Campaign in Italy, the amphibious assault on Anzio-code-named Operation Shingle, and the subsequent drive to Rome remains one of the most controversial military operations in history. Although the Allies eventually captured Rome from the Germans, the failure to use 'operational thinking' led to a poorly planned and executed operation.
Most historical accounts blame the failures at Anzio on the lack of aggressiveness by the Operation Shingle commander Major General John P. Lucas. However, when viewed in the larger context of the strategy to defeat Germany and the Allied Campaign in Italy, Operation Shingle is a showcase of failure at the operational level of war. Political rather than military considerations drove Shingle-dooming the operation from the start.
Anzio demonstrates the importance of linking tactical actions to operational and strategic objectives. At the strategic level of war, the Allies had a sound strategy to defeat Germany. However, at the operational level of war, the decision to launch Shingle did not adequately assess risk. In operational design, commanders failed to define an objective, lacked sufficient mass, and did not include alternative plans based on potential enemy actions. During planning and preparation, the Allies misjudged the enemy's center of gravity and failed to exploit valuable intelligence. During execution, operational leadership lacked initiative. Finally, the complexity and tensions created by the combined operation made unity of effort difficult. These lessons should benefit future operations.

More books from Lucknow Books

Cover of the book Important Differences Between Successful And Unsuccessful Senior Allied Army Combat Leaders by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book Airborne Invasion Of Crete, 1941 by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book A Sunny Subaltern, Billy’s Letters from Flanders by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book Work Horse Of The Western Front; The Story Of The 30th Infantry Division by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book Best O'Luck: How A Fighting Canadian Won The Thanks Of Britain's King by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book Letters From An American Soldier To His Father, By Curtis Wheeler, Second Lieutenant Of Field, Artillery, U. S. R. by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book Small Unit Actions [Illustrated Edition] by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book Dieppe 1942: Reconnaissance In Force With Strategic Overtones by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book Air Power For Patton’s Army: The XIX Tactical Air Command In The Second World War [Illustrated Edition] by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book The Military Utility Of German Rocketry During World War II by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book Gallipoli Diary [Illustrated Edition] by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book On Two Fronts - Being The Adventures Of An Indian Mule Corps In France And Gallipoli by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book Pacific Counterblow - The 11th Bombardment Group And The 67th Fighter Squadron In The Battle For Guadalcanal by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book Letters Written From The English Front In France Between September 1914 And March 1915 by Captain Stephen P. Gray
Cover of the book Comparison Of The Invasion Of Crete And The Proposed Invasion Of Malta by Captain Stephen P. Gray
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy