Approaching the U.S. Constitution

Sacred Covenant or Plaything for Lawyers and Judges

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Legal History, Constitutional, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Approaching the U.S. Constitution by Kerry L. Hunter, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Kerry L. Hunter ISBN: 9780739190838
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: June 18, 2014
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Kerry L. Hunter
ISBN: 9780739190838
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: June 18, 2014
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

By reminding readers that early Supreme Court justices refused to reduce the Constitution to a mere legal document, Approaching the U.S. Constitution provides a definitive response to Reading Law by Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner. Turning to the vision of Alexander Hamilton found in Federalists No. 78, Hunter argues that rather than seeing the judiciary as America’s legal guardian, Hamilton looked to independent individuals of integrity on the judiciary to be the nation’s collective conscience. For Hamilton, the judiciary’s authority over the legislature does not derive from positive law but is extra-legal by 'design' and is purely moral.

By emphasizing the legal expertise of judges alone, individuals such as Justice Scalia mistakenly demand that judges exercise no human ethical judgment whatsoever. Yet the more this happens, the more the “rule of law” is replaced by the rule of lawyers. Legal sophistry becomes the primary currency wherewith society’s ethical and moral questions are resolved. Moreover, the alleged neutrality of legal analysis is deceptive with its claims of judicial modesty. It is not only undemocratic, it is dictatorial and highly elitist. Public debate over questions of fairness is replaced by an exclusive legalistic debate between lawyers over what is legal. The more Scalia and Garner realize their agenda, the more all appeals to what is moral will be effectively removed from political debate. 'Conservatives' lament the 'removing God from the classroom,' by 'liberals,' yet if the advocates of legalism get their way, God will be effectively removed from the polis altogether.

The answer to preserving both separation of powers and the American commitment to unalienable human rights is to view the Supreme Court in the same way early founders such as Hamilton did and in the way President Abraham Lincoln urged. The Court’s most important function in exercising the power of judicial review is to serve as the nation’s conscience just as it did in Brown v. Board of Education.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

By reminding readers that early Supreme Court justices refused to reduce the Constitution to a mere legal document, Approaching the U.S. Constitution provides a definitive response to Reading Law by Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner. Turning to the vision of Alexander Hamilton found in Federalists No. 78, Hunter argues that rather than seeing the judiciary as America’s legal guardian, Hamilton looked to independent individuals of integrity on the judiciary to be the nation’s collective conscience. For Hamilton, the judiciary’s authority over the legislature does not derive from positive law but is extra-legal by 'design' and is purely moral.

By emphasizing the legal expertise of judges alone, individuals such as Justice Scalia mistakenly demand that judges exercise no human ethical judgment whatsoever. Yet the more this happens, the more the “rule of law” is replaced by the rule of lawyers. Legal sophistry becomes the primary currency wherewith society’s ethical and moral questions are resolved. Moreover, the alleged neutrality of legal analysis is deceptive with its claims of judicial modesty. It is not only undemocratic, it is dictatorial and highly elitist. Public debate over questions of fairness is replaced by an exclusive legalistic debate between lawyers over what is legal. The more Scalia and Garner realize their agenda, the more all appeals to what is moral will be effectively removed from political debate. 'Conservatives' lament the 'removing God from the classroom,' by 'liberals,' yet if the advocates of legalism get their way, God will be effectively removed from the polis altogether.

The answer to preserving both separation of powers and the American commitment to unalienable human rights is to view the Supreme Court in the same way early founders such as Hamilton did and in the way President Abraham Lincoln urged. The Court’s most important function in exercising the power of judicial review is to serve as the nation’s conscience just as it did in Brown v. Board of Education.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Health Communication and Breast Cancer among Black Women by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Ethnic Identity and Minority Protection by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Anthropology of Los Angeles by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book The Social Life of Tibetan Biography by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Walk Away by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Epistemic Issues in Pragmatic Perspective by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Free Speech on America's K–12 and College Campuses by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Crossing Boundaries by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Prying Open Fortress Europe by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book The Forest in Medieval German Literature by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book The Rhetorical Legacy of Wangari Maathai by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book African Women Under Fire by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Culture and the Cuban State by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book The Soviet Union and the Horn of Africa during the Cold War by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Absent Mother God of the West by Kerry L. Hunter
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy