Behavioralism in Political Science

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Psychology, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Behavioralism in Political Science by Richard J. Gelles, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Richard J. Gelles ISBN: 9781351314343
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: September 8, 2017
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Richard J. Gelles
ISBN: 9781351314343
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: September 8, 2017
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

Changes in the thinking of science are usually accompanied by lively intellectual conflicts between opposing or divergent points of view. The clash of ideas is a major ingredient in the stimulation of the life of the mind in human culture. Such arguments and counter-arguments, of proofs and disproofs, permit changes in the arts and sciences to take place. Political science is not exempt from these conflicts.

Since the middle of the twentieth century, the study of politics has been rocked by disagreements over its scope, theories, and methods. These disagreements were somewhat less frequent than in most sciences, natural or behavioral, but they have been at times bitter and persuasive. The subject matter of political science politics and all that is involved in politics has a halo effect. The stakes of politics make people fight and sometimes die for what they claim as their due. Political scientists seem to confuse academic with political stakes, behaving as if the victories and defeats on the battleground of the intellect resemble those on the battleground of political life.

Three issues seem critical to political science at the time this volume first appeared in the 1960s: First, disagreement over the nature of the knowledge of political things is a science of politics possible, or is the study of politics a matter of philosophy? Second, controversy over the place of values in the study of politics a controversy that makes for a great deal of confusion. Third, disagreements over the basic units of analysis in the study of politics‘should the political scientist study individual and collective behavior, or limit the work to the study of institutions and large-scale processes? This collection brings together the most persuasive writings on these topics in the mid-1960s.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Changes in the thinking of science are usually accompanied by lively intellectual conflicts between opposing or divergent points of view. The clash of ideas is a major ingredient in the stimulation of the life of the mind in human culture. Such arguments and counter-arguments, of proofs and disproofs, permit changes in the arts and sciences to take place. Political science is not exempt from these conflicts.

Since the middle of the twentieth century, the study of politics has been rocked by disagreements over its scope, theories, and methods. These disagreements were somewhat less frequent than in most sciences, natural or behavioral, but they have been at times bitter and persuasive. The subject matter of political science politics and all that is involved in politics has a halo effect. The stakes of politics make people fight and sometimes die for what they claim as their due. Political scientists seem to confuse academic with political stakes, behaving as if the victories and defeats on the battleground of the intellect resemble those on the battleground of political life.

Three issues seem critical to political science at the time this volume first appeared in the 1960s: First, disagreement over the nature of the knowledge of political things is a science of politics possible, or is the study of politics a matter of philosophy? Second, controversy over the place of values in the study of politics a controversy that makes for a great deal of confusion. Third, disagreements over the basic units of analysis in the study of politics‘should the political scientist study individual and collective behavior, or limit the work to the study of institutions and large-scale processes? This collection brings together the most persuasive writings on these topics in the mid-1960s.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Doing Survey Research by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Street Smart by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Cyberdemocracy by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Transitions in the Early Years by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book An Imperial State at War by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Central Bank Autonomy by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Intimations of Postmodernity by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Security versus Justice? by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Cross-Cultural Psychology by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Islam in Malaysian Foreign Policy by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book The Monument of Matrones Volume 2 (Lamp 4) by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Influential Papers from the 1940s by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Seven Myths About Education by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Japan at Play by Richard J. Gelles
Cover of the book Children and Young People Who Sexually Abuse Others by Richard J. Gelles
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy