Closed Systems and Open Minds

The Limits of Naivety in Social Anthropology

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Anthropology
Cover of the book Closed Systems and Open Minds by Thomas Szasz, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Thomas Szasz ISBN: 9781351527828
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: July 12, 2017
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Thomas Szasz
ISBN: 9781351527828
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: July 12, 2017
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

Social anthropology, defined operationally in terms of what social anthropologists have done in the last fifty years, is the study and comparison of tribal societies and of small fields of social life with emphasis on the role of custom. When a social anthropologist's research leads him into any field, which belongs to other disciplines, what line should he adopt? What use may he make of the results that other scholars have already achieved? Must he knowingly make naive assumptions concerning events, which they have regarded as complex? In each of the fascinating essays which in turn form the core of this book - V. W. Turner's on symbols in Ndembu ritual; F.G. Bailey's on disputes which occurred in two Orissa villages; A. L. Epstein's on urban communities in Africa; T. Lupton's and S. Cunnison's on the relationship between behaviour in three Manchester workshops and certain events which happened outside; and W. Watson's on social mobility and social class in a coalmining Scottish burgh-several social anthropologists attempt to answer these questions by discussing the problems of method that they have encountered in their own recent research; and in the searching discussion which sum up the results. To analyze one first has to circumscribe one's field, and then simplify within the area of circumscription. Both circumscription and simplification may involve procedures of absorbing, abridging, and making naive assumptions. The contributors draw attention to the attempt to distinguish between psychical facts (emotions, thoughts, etc.) and psychological, which we believe should apply only to statements within the science of psychology, and not to be used by the former. They similarly distinguish between social facts and sociological or social-anthropological statements. ""Psychological"" and ""sociological"" are so well established in common parlance as adjectives to categorize facts that attempts to specialize them as hopeless.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Social anthropology, defined operationally in terms of what social anthropologists have done in the last fifty years, is the study and comparison of tribal societies and of small fields of social life with emphasis on the role of custom. When a social anthropologist's research leads him into any field, which belongs to other disciplines, what line should he adopt? What use may he make of the results that other scholars have already achieved? Must he knowingly make naive assumptions concerning events, which they have regarded as complex? In each of the fascinating essays which in turn form the core of this book - V. W. Turner's on symbols in Ndembu ritual; F.G. Bailey's on disputes which occurred in two Orissa villages; A. L. Epstein's on urban communities in Africa; T. Lupton's and S. Cunnison's on the relationship between behaviour in three Manchester workshops and certain events which happened outside; and W. Watson's on social mobility and social class in a coalmining Scottish burgh-several social anthropologists attempt to answer these questions by discussing the problems of method that they have encountered in their own recent research; and in the searching discussion which sum up the results. To analyze one first has to circumscribe one's field, and then simplify within the area of circumscription. Both circumscription and simplification may involve procedures of absorbing, abridging, and making naive assumptions. The contributors draw attention to the attempt to distinguish between psychical facts (emotions, thoughts, etc.) and psychological, which we believe should apply only to statements within the science of psychology, and not to be used by the former. They similarly distinguish between social facts and sociological or social-anthropological statements. ""Psychological"" and ""sociological"" are so well established in common parlance as adjectives to categorize facts that attempts to specialize them as hopeless.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Testimony by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book Race, Gender, and Class in Criminology by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book The Utility of International Economic Sanctions by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book Transforming Education by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book Perspectives in Sociology by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book A New Vision for Housing by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book At Cross Purposes: U.S.-Taiwan Relations Since 1942 by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book Evolutionary Naturalism by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book The Red Rose and the White by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book The Governance of Urban Green Spaces in the EU by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book Since Lacan by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book 59 Checklists for Project and Programme Managers by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book The Human Geography of East Central Europe by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book The Politics of Southeast Asia's New Media by Thomas Szasz
Cover of the book Rural Crime and Community Safety by Thomas Szasz
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy