Comments on Jacques Maritain's Book (1935) Philosophy of Nature

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Other Sciences, Philosophy & Social Aspects, Religion & Spirituality
Cover of the book Comments on Jacques Maritain's Book (1935) Philosophy of Nature by Razie Mah, Razie Mah
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Razie Mah ISBN: 9781942824497
Publisher: Razie Mah Publication: July 1, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Razie Mah
ISBN: 9781942824497
Publisher: Razie Mah
Publication: July 1, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

Philosopher Jacques Maritain serves as a keystone in the recovery from the excesses of the Age of Ideas (as defined by John Deely, in his masterwork, Four Ages of Understanding). Maritain strives to recover Thomism during the 20th century. But, there are difficulties. The mechanical philosophers of the 17th century jettisoned scholasticism. The scam worked for over three hundred years.
The lockout of Aristotle coincided with a change of terminology. Today, scholastic words stand as vessels. But, we have difficulty re-conceiving the contents. The change of terminology comes on the heels of another change, well underway in the 13th century, from Plato to Aristotle as a paradigm of inquiry.
Now comes another shift.
In the late 19th century, Charles S. Peirce discovered that the sign is a triadic relation. Ironically, the Baroque scholastic, John Poinsot, formulated the sign as a triadic relation in the 17th century. No one knew. In fact, no one would know today if Maritain had not suggested that Deely look into the matter. Deely found John Poinsot's definition of sign.
Today, Daniel Novotny carries on the study of the Baroque scholastics.
Aristotle's causalities participate in triadic relations.
When the early modernists exiled Aristotle, they also blocked the way to understanding triadic relations.
Maritain's book opens the door to a recovery.
In these comments, the shifting balance among the empirical sciences, religion and natural philosophy are rendered as judgments. There are two types of judgments. Reflective judgments do not unfold into category-based nested forms. Actionable judgments do.
Here is a scholarly portal into the fourth age of understanding.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Philosopher Jacques Maritain serves as a keystone in the recovery from the excesses of the Age of Ideas (as defined by John Deely, in his masterwork, Four Ages of Understanding). Maritain strives to recover Thomism during the 20th century. But, there are difficulties. The mechanical philosophers of the 17th century jettisoned scholasticism. The scam worked for over three hundred years.
The lockout of Aristotle coincided with a change of terminology. Today, scholastic words stand as vessels. But, we have difficulty re-conceiving the contents. The change of terminology comes on the heels of another change, well underway in the 13th century, from Plato to Aristotle as a paradigm of inquiry.
Now comes another shift.
In the late 19th century, Charles S. Peirce discovered that the sign is a triadic relation. Ironically, the Baroque scholastic, John Poinsot, formulated the sign as a triadic relation in the 17th century. No one knew. In fact, no one would know today if Maritain had not suggested that Deely look into the matter. Deely found John Poinsot's definition of sign.
Today, Daniel Novotny carries on the study of the Baroque scholastics.
Aristotle's causalities participate in triadic relations.
When the early modernists exiled Aristotle, they also blocked the way to understanding triadic relations.
Maritain's book opens the door to a recovery.
In these comments, the shifting balance among the empirical sciences, religion and natural philosophy are rendered as judgments. There are two types of judgments. Reflective judgments do not unfold into category-based nested forms. Actionable judgments do.
Here is a scholarly portal into the fourth age of understanding.

More books from Razie Mah

Cover of the book The First Singularity and Its Fairy Tale Trace by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Giovanni Maddalena's Essay (2017) "Jung and Peirce" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Joseph Carroll’s Chapter (2018) "Evolutionary Literary Theory" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book The Second Primer on the Organization Tier by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Peter Burfeind’s Book (2014) Gnostic America by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on James Madden’s Essay (2017) A Thomistic Theory of Intentionality by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Steven Mithen's Book (1996) The Prehistory of The Mind by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky's Book (2016) Why Only Us? by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on Classical Political Philosophy by Razie Mah
Cover of the book The Inevitable Twist: Comments on Lamoureux’s Question by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on Sensible and Social Construction by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Jeremy Cohen's Essay (1980) "Original Sin as The Evil Inclination" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on Another Infrasovereign Religion by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) "Explanation and the Study of Religion" by Razie Mah
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy