Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding: A Key Triad"

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Epistemology, Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, Theory
Cover of the book Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding: A Key Triad" by Razie Mah, Razie Mah
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Razie Mah ISBN: 9781942824527
Publisher: Razie Mah Publication: August 5, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Razie Mah
ISBN: 9781942824527
Publisher: Razie Mah
Publication: August 5, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

After Thomas Sebeok dies, John Deely assumes the mantle as the premier semiotician in America. After a few short years, John Deely dies. Now, there is no independent thinker to don the robe. In this lacunae, we remember.
Paul Cobley offers a wonderful contribution. His article first appears online in June 2018 for The American Journal of Semiotics, the flagship publication of the Semiotic Society of America. He engages with one of Deely's many formulations of triadic relations. In contrast to Peirce's sign-vehicle, sign-object and sign-interpretant, Deely speaks of a scholastic triad: thing, object and sign.
The "sign" virtually (in virtue, not in simulation) brings an "object" into relation with the potential of a "thing".
Clearly, Deely's "sign" is not quite the same as Peirce's sign.
The category-based nested form affords a way to re-articulate Cobley's argument.
In Comments on Deely's Book (1994) New Beginnings, the category-based nested form is used to demonstrate the relational structure of the specificative and exemplar extrinsic formal causalities of signs. The scholastics come up with something very close to Peirce's definition of sign. Deely knows this.
So, Deely's triad must complement or play, in a post-modern fashion, on Peirce's definition of sign and the scholastic analysis of sign causality.
Paul Cobley's essay offers an opportunity to explore this curiosity.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

After Thomas Sebeok dies, John Deely assumes the mantle as the premier semiotician in America. After a few short years, John Deely dies. Now, there is no independent thinker to don the robe. In this lacunae, we remember.
Paul Cobley offers a wonderful contribution. His article first appears online in June 2018 for The American Journal of Semiotics, the flagship publication of the Semiotic Society of America. He engages with one of Deely's many formulations of triadic relations. In contrast to Peirce's sign-vehicle, sign-object and sign-interpretant, Deely speaks of a scholastic triad: thing, object and sign.
The "sign" virtually (in virtue, not in simulation) brings an "object" into relation with the potential of a "thing".
Clearly, Deely's "sign" is not quite the same as Peirce's sign.
The category-based nested form affords a way to re-articulate Cobley's argument.
In Comments on Deely's Book (1994) New Beginnings, the category-based nested form is used to demonstrate the relational structure of the specificative and exemplar extrinsic formal causalities of signs. The scholastics come up with something very close to Peirce's definition of sign. Deely knows this.
So, Deely's triad must complement or play, in a post-modern fashion, on Peirce's definition of sign and the scholastic analysis of sign causality.
Paul Cobley's essay offers an opportunity to explore this curiosity.

More books from Razie Mah

Cover of the book Comments on Carlos Blanco-Perez's Essay (2018) "On the Principles of a Social Theory" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book An Essay on Causality in the Empirical and Social Sciences by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Speculations on Thomism and Evolution by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) "Explanation and the Study of Religion" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on David McNeill's Book (2012) How Language Began by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on Another Infrasovereign Religion by Razie Mah
Cover of the book How To Define the Word "Religion" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Joseph Carroll’s Chapter (2018) "Evolutionary Literary Theory" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Lessons 1-12 for Instructor’s Guide to An Archaeology of the Fall and Related Scriptures by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Giovanni Maddalena's Essay (2017) "Jung and Peirce" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning by Razie Mah
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy