Confronting the Death Penalty

How Language Influences Jurors in Capital Cases

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Criminal law, Language Arts, Linguistics
Cover of the book Confronting the Death Penalty by Robin Conley, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Robin Conley ISBN: 9780190263904
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: November 2, 2015
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Robin Conley
ISBN: 9780190263904
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: November 2, 2015
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

Confronting the Death Penalty: How Language Influences Jurors in Capital Cases probes how jurors make the ultimate decision about whether another human being should live or die. Drawing on ethnographic and qualitative linguistic methods, this book explores the means through which language helps to make death penalty decisions possible - how specific linguistic choices mediate and restrict jurors', attorneys', and judges' actions and experiences while serving and reflecting on capital trials. The analysis draws on fifteen months of ethnographic fieldwork in diverse counties across Texas, including participant observation in four capital trials and post-verdict interviews with the jurors who decided those cases. Given the impossibility of access to actual capital jury deliberations, this integration of methods aims to provide the clearest possible window into jurors' decision-making. Using methods from linguistic anthropology, conversation analysis, and multi-modal discourse analysis, Conley analyzes interviews, trial talk, and written legal language to reveal a variety of communicative practices through which jurors dehumanize defendants and thus judge them to be deserving of death. By focusing on how language can both facilitate and stymie empathic encounters, the book addresses a conflict inherent to death penalty trials: jurors literally face defendants during trial and then must distort, diminish, or negate these face-to-face interactions in order to sentence those same defendants to death. The book reveals that jurors cite legal ideologies of rational, dispassionate decision-making - conveyed in the form of authoritative legal language - when negotiating these moral conflicts. By investigating the interface between experiential and linguistic aspects of legal decision-making, the book breaks new ground in studies of law and language, language and psychology, and the death penalty.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Confronting the Death Penalty: How Language Influences Jurors in Capital Cases probes how jurors make the ultimate decision about whether another human being should live or die. Drawing on ethnographic and qualitative linguistic methods, this book explores the means through which language helps to make death penalty decisions possible - how specific linguistic choices mediate and restrict jurors', attorneys', and judges' actions and experiences while serving and reflecting on capital trials. The analysis draws on fifteen months of ethnographic fieldwork in diverse counties across Texas, including participant observation in four capital trials and post-verdict interviews with the jurors who decided those cases. Given the impossibility of access to actual capital jury deliberations, this integration of methods aims to provide the clearest possible window into jurors' decision-making. Using methods from linguistic anthropology, conversation analysis, and multi-modal discourse analysis, Conley analyzes interviews, trial talk, and written legal language to reveal a variety of communicative practices through which jurors dehumanize defendants and thus judge them to be deserving of death. By focusing on how language can both facilitate and stymie empathic encounters, the book addresses a conflict inherent to death penalty trials: jurors literally face defendants during trial and then must distort, diminish, or negate these face-to-face interactions in order to sentence those same defendants to death. The book reveals that jurors cite legal ideologies of rational, dispassionate decision-making - conveyed in the form of authoritative legal language - when negotiating these moral conflicts. By investigating the interface between experiential and linguistic aspects of legal decision-making, the book breaks new ground in studies of law and language, language and psychology, and the death penalty.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Mafia Life by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Sherlock Holmes: Two Plays - With Audio Level 1 Oxford Bookworms Library by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Gospels before the Book by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Competing in the Information Age by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Developmental Influences on Adult Intelligence by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Joseph Smith, Jr. by Robin Conley
Cover of the book The Body of God by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Public vs. Private by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Breaking Robert's Rules : The New Way to Run Your Meeting Build Consensus and Get Results by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Modern Greece by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Islamic Political Identity in Turkey by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Comparative Patent Remedies by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Family Engagement with Schools by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Major Depressive Disorder by Robin Conley
Cover of the book Assisted Death in Europe and America by Robin Conley
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy