Contested Issues in the Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse

A Response to Questions Raised in Kuehnle and Connell's Edited Collection

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Medical, Patient Care, Health Care Delivery, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Social Work
Cover of the book Contested Issues in the Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse by , Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9781317683681
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: January 8, 2016
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9781317683681
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: January 8, 2016
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

This book represents a significant contribution to the highly contested debate surrounding how allegations of child sexual abuse should be evaluated. Despite decades of substantial research in this sensitive area, professional consensus remains elusive. A particular source of contention is the sensitivity vs. specificity debate; whether evaluators should aim to reduce the number of true allegations that are labelled false or to reduce the number of false allegations that are labelled true.

This edited collection aims to address directly and offer new insights into this debate. It responds directly to Kuehnle and Connell's edited volume, The Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse Allegations: A Comprehensive Guide to Assessment and Testimony (2009), which included chapters which advocated strong specificity positions at the expense of sensitivity. The chapters in this collection feature both challenges to, and replies by, the authors in Kuehnle and Connell's book, making this an essential resource that moves the debate forward.

This book was originally published as a special issue of the Journal of Child Sexual Abuse.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book represents a significant contribution to the highly contested debate surrounding how allegations of child sexual abuse should be evaluated. Despite decades of substantial research in this sensitive area, professional consensus remains elusive. A particular source of contention is the sensitivity vs. specificity debate; whether evaluators should aim to reduce the number of true allegations that are labelled false or to reduce the number of false allegations that are labelled true.

This edited collection aims to address directly and offer new insights into this debate. It responds directly to Kuehnle and Connell's edited volume, The Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse Allegations: A Comprehensive Guide to Assessment and Testimony (2009), which included chapters which advocated strong specificity positions at the expense of sensitivity. The chapters in this collection feature both challenges to, and replies by, the authors in Kuehnle and Connell's book, making this an essential resource that moves the debate forward.

This book was originally published as a special issue of the Journal of Child Sexual Abuse.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Low-Income Students and the Perpetuation of Inequality by
Cover of the book Migrants in Modern France by
Cover of the book International Perspectives on Teaching English in a Globalised World by
Cover of the book Ethnic Cleansing During the Cold War by
Cover of the book Planning with Complexity by
Cover of the book Exhibiting Craft and Design by
Cover of the book Instructional Supervision by
Cover of the book Contours of Relationship by
Cover of the book Locke by
Cover of the book Gaetano Donizetti by
Cover of the book The Emergence of European Trade Unionism by
Cover of the book Early Professional Women in Northern Europe, c. 1650-1850 by
Cover of the book Co-operation and Globalisation by
Cover of the book The Politics of Christian Zionism 1891-1948 by
Cover of the book Trouble in the Middle by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy