Cosmopolis

Imagining Community in Late Classical Athens and the Early Roman Empire

Nonfiction, History, Ancient History, Rome
Cover of the book Cosmopolis by Daniel S. Richter, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Daniel S. Richter ISBN: 9780190454197
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: April 15, 2011
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Daniel S. Richter
ISBN: 9780190454197
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: April 15, 2011
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

This is a book about the ways in which various intellectuals in the post-classical Mediterranean imagined the human community as a unified, homogenous whole composed of a diversity of parts. More specifically, it explores how authors of the second century CE adopted and adapted a particular ethnic and cultural discourse that had been elaborated by late fifth- and fourth-century BCE Athenian intellectuals. At the center of this book is a series of contests over the meaning of lineage and descent and the extent to which the political community is or ought to be coterminous with what we might call a biologically homogenous collectivity. The study suggests that early imperial intellectuals found in late classical and early Hellenistic thought a way of accommodating the claims of both ethnicity and culture in a single discourse of communal identity. The idea of the unity of humankind evolved in the fifth and fourth centuries as a response to and an engine for the creation of a rapidly shrinking and increasingly integrated oikoumenê . The increased presence of outsiders in the classical city-state as well as the creation of sources of authority that lay outside of the polis destabilized the idea of the polis as a kin group (natio). Beginning in the early fourth century and gaining great momentum in the wake of Alexander's conquest of the East, traditional dichotomies such as Greek and barbarian lost much of their explanatory power. In the second-century CE, by contrast, the empire of the Romans imposed a political space that was imagined by many to be coterminous with the oikoumenê itself. One of the central claims of this study is that the forms of cosmopolitan and ecumenical thought that emerged in both moments did so as responses to the idea that the natio - the kin group - is (or ought to be) the basis for any human collectivity.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This is a book about the ways in which various intellectuals in the post-classical Mediterranean imagined the human community as a unified, homogenous whole composed of a diversity of parts. More specifically, it explores how authors of the second century CE adopted and adapted a particular ethnic and cultural discourse that had been elaborated by late fifth- and fourth-century BCE Athenian intellectuals. At the center of this book is a series of contests over the meaning of lineage and descent and the extent to which the political community is or ought to be coterminous with what we might call a biologically homogenous collectivity. The study suggests that early imperial intellectuals found in late classical and early Hellenistic thought a way of accommodating the claims of both ethnicity and culture in a single discourse of communal identity. The idea of the unity of humankind evolved in the fifth and fourth centuries as a response to and an engine for the creation of a rapidly shrinking and increasingly integrated oikoumenê . The increased presence of outsiders in the classical city-state as well as the creation of sources of authority that lay outside of the polis destabilized the idea of the polis as a kin group (natio). Beginning in the early fourth century and gaining great momentum in the wake of Alexander's conquest of the East, traditional dichotomies such as Greek and barbarian lost much of their explanatory power. In the second-century CE, by contrast, the empire of the Romans imposed a political space that was imagined by many to be coterminous with the oikoumenê itself. One of the central claims of this study is that the forms of cosmopolitan and ecumenical thought that emerged in both moments did so as responses to the idea that the natio - the kin group - is (or ought to be) the basis for any human collectivity.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Imagination: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book What Is Race? by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book In Praise of Profanity by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book The Aristocratic Temper of Greek Civilization by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book Understanding Somatization in the Practice of Clinical Neuropsychology by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book Recording on a Budget by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book Toward Democracy by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book Dispensational Modernism by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book It Began with Babbage by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book Out of Obscurity by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book The Nature of Clinical Medicine by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book When Nationalism Began to Hate by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book The Indian Great Awakening by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book Tibetan Buddhism: A Very Short Introduction by Daniel S. Richter
Cover of the book Madeleine's Children by Daniel S. Richter
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy