Dangerous Democracies and Partying Prime Ministers

Domestic Political Contexts and Foreign Policy

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Democracy, International, International Relations
Cover of the book Dangerous Democracies and Partying Prime Ministers by Chad Atkinson, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Chad Atkinson ISBN: 9780739133613
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: January 5, 2010
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Chad Atkinson
ISBN: 9780739133613
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: January 5, 2010
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

This book examines why elected leaders pursue foreign policies that are remarkably distant from their proposed policies. To investigate this pattern this book develops a model of how the foreign policy preferences of the executive and the government in the legislature interact over the electoral cycle to affect democratic leaders' foreign policy choices. The executive is cross-pressured when the foreign policy that the legislature wants is not the same policy that the executive's constituents want. The executive must choose a policy that balances the conflicting demands of remaining in a productive government (pleasing the legislature) and obtaining votes in the next election (pleasing constituents). Getting votes is clearly more important when elections are near, so democratic leaders weigh these competing demands differently over the course of the electoral cycle. This is what can lead to trends in foreign policy: the executive first chooses policies that mollify the legislature and later reverts to the policies that please his or her constituents when elections draw near. The book pursues these ideas with a game theoretic model and a set of statistical assessment of multiple cases (Israel and the Palestinians, the US and the USSR, and others) to provide a rigorous and logical framework to the argument. The central findings are that democratic institutions and processes (i.e. the domestic context) have a predictable influence on foreign policy choices over time; some configurations of preferences, electoral systems, and election timing are not conducive to peace. Rather than the diversionary hypothesis that conflict is likely before an election, as a boost to executive popularity would be particularly valuable at that moment, a more nuanced finding is reported.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book examines why elected leaders pursue foreign policies that are remarkably distant from their proposed policies. To investigate this pattern this book develops a model of how the foreign policy preferences of the executive and the government in the legislature interact over the electoral cycle to affect democratic leaders' foreign policy choices. The executive is cross-pressured when the foreign policy that the legislature wants is not the same policy that the executive's constituents want. The executive must choose a policy that balances the conflicting demands of remaining in a productive government (pleasing the legislature) and obtaining votes in the next election (pleasing constituents). Getting votes is clearly more important when elections are near, so democratic leaders weigh these competing demands differently over the course of the electoral cycle. This is what can lead to trends in foreign policy: the executive first chooses policies that mollify the legislature and later reverts to the policies that please his or her constituents when elections draw near. The book pursues these ideas with a game theoretic model and a set of statistical assessment of multiple cases (Israel and the Palestinians, the US and the USSR, and others) to provide a rigorous and logical framework to the argument. The central findings are that democratic institutions and processes (i.e. the domestic context) have a predictable influence on foreign policy choices over time; some configurations of preferences, electoral systems, and election timing are not conducive to peace. Rather than the diversionary hypothesis that conflict is likely before an election, as a boost to executive popularity would be particularly valuable at that moment, a more nuanced finding is reported.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book The Book of Esther and the Typology of Female Transfiguration in American Literature by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book The Soul of Statesmanship by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book The Rhetoric of Pope Francis by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book Buddhist-Based Universities in the United States by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book Ukrainian Intelligentsia in Post-Soviet L'viv by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book Song and Social Change in Latin America by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book Timor-Leste by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book Brazilian Foreign Policy in Changing Times by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book Iconic Events by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book Expressing the Inexpressible in Lyotard and Pseudo-Dionysius by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book Contrary to Thoughtlessness by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book Socratic Philosophy and Its Others by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book For Equals Only by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book Beyond the Classroom Walls by Chad Atkinson
Cover of the book Japan and Germany under the U.S. Occupation by Chad Atkinson
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy