Darwinian Misadventures in the Humanities

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Other Sciences, Philosophy & Social Aspects, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book Darwinian Misadventures in the Humanities by Eugene Goodheart, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Eugene Goodheart ISBN: 9781351523653
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: May 4, 2018
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Eugene Goodheart
ISBN: 9781351523653
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: May 4, 2018
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

In recent decades the humanities have been in thrall to postmodern skepticism, while Darwinists, brimming with confidence in the genuine progress they have made in the sciences of biology and psychology, have set their sights on rescuing the humanities from the ravages of postmodernism. In this volume, Eugene Goodheart attacks the neo-Darwinist approach to the arts and articulates a powerful defense of humanist criticism.

E. O. Wilson, the distinguished Harvard biologist, has spoken of converting philosophy into science, substituting science for religion, and formulating a biological theory of literature and the arts in Consilence: The Unity of Knowledge. Goodheart demonstrates that Wilson's efforts, and those of his colleagues Richard Dawkins, Steven Pinker, and Daniel Dennett among others, have resulted in scientism rather than science. If, for example, Dawkins had contented himself in The Selfish Gene with the claim that Darwinism had made worthless other answers to the question of how we have evolved, he would have given offense only to creationists, but questions of meaning and purpose are of another order.

Contemporary Darwinist critiques err in assuming that art and traditional criticism aspire to truths that can be codified in terms of scientific laws. If this were so, we would have to regard the speculations of Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Montaigne, Shakespeare, and Rousseau as worthless. Goodheart exposes the philistinism of literary Darwinism, the bad faith and inverted fundamentalism of the Darwinian approach to religion, and the dangers of the eff ort to create a Darwinian ethical system. Taken together, Goodheart's arguments show that in moving beyond their area of competence, the neo -Darwinists commit an ideology, not a science.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In recent decades the humanities have been in thrall to postmodern skepticism, while Darwinists, brimming with confidence in the genuine progress they have made in the sciences of biology and psychology, have set their sights on rescuing the humanities from the ravages of postmodernism. In this volume, Eugene Goodheart attacks the neo-Darwinist approach to the arts and articulates a powerful defense of humanist criticism.

E. O. Wilson, the distinguished Harvard biologist, has spoken of converting philosophy into science, substituting science for religion, and formulating a biological theory of literature and the arts in Consilence: The Unity of Knowledge. Goodheart demonstrates that Wilson's efforts, and those of his colleagues Richard Dawkins, Steven Pinker, and Daniel Dennett among others, have resulted in scientism rather than science. If, for example, Dawkins had contented himself in The Selfish Gene with the claim that Darwinism had made worthless other answers to the question of how we have evolved, he would have given offense only to creationists, but questions of meaning and purpose are of another order.

Contemporary Darwinist critiques err in assuming that art and traditional criticism aspire to truths that can be codified in terms of scientific laws. If this were so, we would have to regard the speculations of Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Montaigne, Shakespeare, and Rousseau as worthless. Goodheart exposes the philistinism of literary Darwinism, the bad faith and inverted fundamentalism of the Darwinian approach to religion, and the dangers of the eff ort to create a Darwinian ethical system. Taken together, Goodheart's arguments show that in moving beyond their area of competence, the neo -Darwinists commit an ideology, not a science.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Social Networks, Innovation and the Knowledge Economy by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Women Making Meaning by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Strategy Journeys by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Single-case and Small-n Experimental Designs by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book The Military Revolution Debate by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book May Sinclair by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Leading the Police by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book The House in Southeast Asia by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Family Therapy and the Autism Spectrum by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book An Andrew Marvell Companion (Routledge Revivals) by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Scientific and Technical Translation by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Judging and Understanding by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book The Merry Devil of Edmonton by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Cuneiform Texts and the Writing of History by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book War Over the Family by Eugene Goodheart
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy