Discourse on Civility and Barbarity

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Sociology, Marriage & Family, Anthropology, Religion & Spirituality, Theology
Cover of the book Discourse on Civility and Barbarity by Timothy Fitzgerald, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Timothy Fitzgerald ISBN: 9780190293642
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: December 4, 2007
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Timothy Fitzgerald
ISBN: 9780190293642
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: December 4, 2007
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

In recent years scholars have begun to question the usefulness of the category of ''religion'' to describe a distinctive form of human experience and behavior. In his last book, The Ideology of Religious Studies (OUP 2000), Timothy Fitzgerald argued that ''religion'' was not a private area of human existence that could be separated from the public realm and that the study of religion as such was thus impossibility. In this new book he examines a wide range of English-language texts to show how religion became transformed from a very specific category indigenous to Christian culture into a universalist claim about human nature and society. These claims, he shows, are implied by and frequently explicit in theories and methods of comparative religion. But they are also tacitly reproduced throughout the humanities in the relatively indiscriminate use of ''religion'' as an a priori valid cross-cultural analytical concept, for example in historiography, sociology, and social anthropology. Fitzgerald seeks to link the argument about religion to the parallel formation of the ''non-religious'' and such dichotomies as church-state, sacred-profane, ecclesiastical-civil, spiritual-temporal, supernatural-natural, and irrational-rational. Part of his argument is that the category ''religion'' has a different logic compared to the category ''sacred,'' but the two have been consistently confused by major writers, including Durkheim and Eliade. Fitzgerald contends that ''religion'' imagined as a private belief in the supernatural was a necessary conceptual space for the simultaneous imagining of ''secular'' practices and institutions such as politics, economics, and the Nation State. The invention of ''religion'' as a universal type of experience, practice, and institution was partly the result of sacralizing new concepts of exchange, ownership, and labor practices, applying ''scientific'' rationality to human behavior, administering the colonies and classifying native institutions. In contrast, shows Fitzgerald, the sacred-profane dichotomy has a different logic of use.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In recent years scholars have begun to question the usefulness of the category of ''religion'' to describe a distinctive form of human experience and behavior. In his last book, The Ideology of Religious Studies (OUP 2000), Timothy Fitzgerald argued that ''religion'' was not a private area of human existence that could be separated from the public realm and that the study of religion as such was thus impossibility. In this new book he examines a wide range of English-language texts to show how religion became transformed from a very specific category indigenous to Christian culture into a universalist claim about human nature and society. These claims, he shows, are implied by and frequently explicit in theories and methods of comparative religion. But they are also tacitly reproduced throughout the humanities in the relatively indiscriminate use of ''religion'' as an a priori valid cross-cultural analytical concept, for example in historiography, sociology, and social anthropology. Fitzgerald seeks to link the argument about religion to the parallel formation of the ''non-religious'' and such dichotomies as church-state, sacred-profane, ecclesiastical-civil, spiritual-temporal, supernatural-natural, and irrational-rational. Part of his argument is that the category ''religion'' has a different logic compared to the category ''sacred,'' but the two have been consistently confused by major writers, including Durkheim and Eliade. Fitzgerald contends that ''religion'' imagined as a private belief in the supernatural was a necessary conceptual space for the simultaneous imagining of ''secular'' practices and institutions such as politics, economics, and the Nation State. The invention of ''religion'' as a universal type of experience, practice, and institution was partly the result of sacralizing new concepts of exchange, ownership, and labor practices, applying ''scientific'' rationality to human behavior, administering the colonies and classifying native institutions. In contrast, shows Fitzgerald, the sacred-profane dichotomy has a different logic of use.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Beyond Consent by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book American Saint by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book Religious Freedom in Islam by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book Sex Appeal by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book The Happiness Effect by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book How To Think Like a Neandertal by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book Let the People See by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book Gods and Mortals by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book Doing Task-Based Teaching - Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book Anomie: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book The Young Spinoza by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book Paradise Mislaid by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book At This Time and In This Place by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book Last Chance Starter Level Oxford Bookworms Library by Timothy Fitzgerald
Cover of the book Ancestors in Our Genome by Timothy Fitzgerald
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy