Discovering Water

James Watt, Henry Cavendish and the Nineteenth-Century 'Water Controversy'

Nonfiction, History
Cover of the book Discovering Water by David Philip Miller, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: David Philip Miller ISBN: 9781351943758
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: May 15, 2017
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: David Philip Miller
ISBN: 9781351943758
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: May 15, 2017
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

The 'water controversy' concerns one of the central discoveries of modern science, that water is not an element but rather a compound. The allocation of priority in this discovery was contentious in the 1780s and has occupied a number of 20th century historians. The matter is tied up with the larger issues of the so-called chemical revolution of the late eighteenth century. A case can be made for James Watt or Henry Cavendish or Antoine Lavoisier as having priority in the discovery depending upon precisely what the discovery is taken to consist of, however, neither the protagonists themselves in the 1780s nor modern historians qualify as those most fervently interested in the affair. In fact, the controversy attracted most attention in early Victorian Britain some fifty to seventy years after the actual work of Watt, Cavendish and Lavoisier. The central historical question to which the book addresses itself is why the priority claims of long dead natural philosophers so preoccupied a wide range of people in the later period. The answer to the question lies in understanding the enormous symbolic importance of James Watt and Henry Cavendish in nineteenth-century science and society. More than credit for a particular discovery was at stake here. When we examine the various agenda of the participants in the Victorian phase of the water controversy we find it driven by filial loyalty and nationalism but also, most importantly, by ideological struggles about the nature of science and its relation to technological invention and innovation in British society. At a more general, theoretical, level, this study also provides important insights into conceptions of the nature of discovery as they are debated by modern historians, philosophers and sociologists of science.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The 'water controversy' concerns one of the central discoveries of modern science, that water is not an element but rather a compound. The allocation of priority in this discovery was contentious in the 1780s and has occupied a number of 20th century historians. The matter is tied up with the larger issues of the so-called chemical revolution of the late eighteenth century. A case can be made for James Watt or Henry Cavendish or Antoine Lavoisier as having priority in the discovery depending upon precisely what the discovery is taken to consist of, however, neither the protagonists themselves in the 1780s nor modern historians qualify as those most fervently interested in the affair. In fact, the controversy attracted most attention in early Victorian Britain some fifty to seventy years after the actual work of Watt, Cavendish and Lavoisier. The central historical question to which the book addresses itself is why the priority claims of long dead natural philosophers so preoccupied a wide range of people in the later period. The answer to the question lies in understanding the enormous symbolic importance of James Watt and Henry Cavendish in nineteenth-century science and society. More than credit for a particular discovery was at stake here. When we examine the various agenda of the participants in the Victorian phase of the water controversy we find it driven by filial loyalty and nationalism but also, most importantly, by ideological struggles about the nature of science and its relation to technological invention and innovation in British society. At a more general, theoretical, level, this study also provides important insights into conceptions of the nature of discovery as they are debated by modern historians, philosophers and sociologists of science.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Universities and Innovation Economies by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book Human-computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book Action As An Organizer of Learning and Development by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book Buddhism in the Modern World by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book Quality of the Environment by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book Carbon Markets by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book Young Sikhs in a Global World by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book The Political Economy of Nation Building by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book Public Enterprise in Britain by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book Architecture, Islam, and Identity in West Africa by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book Singapore’s Multiculturalism by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book David Ben-Gurion by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book A Queer Capital by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book International Influence Beyond Conditionality by David Philip Miller
Cover of the book Mountain Aesthetics in Early Modern Latin Literature by David Philip Miller
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy