Disjointed Pluralism

Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government
Cover of the book Disjointed Pluralism by Eric Schickler, Princeton University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Eric Schickler ISBN: 9781400824250
Publisher: Princeton University Press Publication: June 27, 2011
Imprint: Princeton University Press Language: English
Author: Eric Schickler
ISBN: 9781400824250
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Publication: June 27, 2011
Imprint: Princeton University Press
Language: English

From the 1910 overthrow of "Czar" Joseph Cannon to the reforms enacted when Republicans took over the House in 1995, institutional change within the U.S. Congress has been both a product and a shaper of congressional politics. For several decades, scholars have explained this process in terms of a particular collective interest shared by members, be it partisanship, reelection worries, or policy motivations. Eric Schickler makes the case that it is actually interplay among multiple interests that determines institutional change. In the process, he explains how congressional institutions have proved remarkably adaptable and yet consistently frustrating for members and outside observers alike.

Analyzing leadership, committee, and procedural restructuring in four periods (1890-1910, 1919-1932, 1937-1952, and 1970-1989), Schickler argues that coalitions promoting a wide range of member interests drive change in both the House and Senate. He shows that multiple interests determine institutional innovation within a period; that different interests are important in different periods; and, more broadly, that changes in the salient collective interests across time do not follow a simple logical or developmental sequence. Institutional development appears disjointed, as new arrangements are layered on preexisting structures intended to serve competing interests. An epilogue assesses the rise and fall of Newt Gingrich in light of these findings.

Schickler's model of "disjointed pluralism" integrates rational choice theory with historical institutionalist approaches. It both complicates and advances efforts at theoretical synthesis by proposing a fuller, more nuanced understanding of institutional innovation--and thus of American political development and history.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

From the 1910 overthrow of "Czar" Joseph Cannon to the reforms enacted when Republicans took over the House in 1995, institutional change within the U.S. Congress has been both a product and a shaper of congressional politics. For several decades, scholars have explained this process in terms of a particular collective interest shared by members, be it partisanship, reelection worries, or policy motivations. Eric Schickler makes the case that it is actually interplay among multiple interests that determines institutional change. In the process, he explains how congressional institutions have proved remarkably adaptable and yet consistently frustrating for members and outside observers alike.

Analyzing leadership, committee, and procedural restructuring in four periods (1890-1910, 1919-1932, 1937-1952, and 1970-1989), Schickler argues that coalitions promoting a wide range of member interests drive change in both the House and Senate. He shows that multiple interests determine institutional innovation within a period; that different interests are important in different periods; and, more broadly, that changes in the salient collective interests across time do not follow a simple logical or developmental sequence. Institutional development appears disjointed, as new arrangements are layered on preexisting structures intended to serve competing interests. An epilogue assesses the rise and fall of Newt Gingrich in light of these findings.

Schickler's model of "disjointed pluralism" integrates rational choice theory with historical institutionalist approaches. It both complicates and advances efforts at theoretical synthesis by proposing a fuller, more nuanced understanding of institutional innovation--and thus of American political development and history.

More books from Princeton University Press

Cover of the book Fourier Analysis by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book Success and Luck by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book The 5 Elements of Effective Thinking by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book How Did the First Stars and Galaxies Form? by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book Awakening Giants, Feet of Clay: Assessing the Economic Rise of China and India by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book Remaking Muslim Politics by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book The Idea of Greater Britain by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book What They Think of Us by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book Philanthropy in America by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book What Is Meaning? by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book Radioactive Starlings by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book Disarmed by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book American Zoo by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book Authorizing Marriage? by Eric Schickler
Cover of the book Big Gods by Eric Schickler
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy