Entick v Carrington

250 Years of the Rule of Law

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Constitutional
Cover of the book Entick v Carrington by , Bloomsbury Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9781509901944
Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Publication: September 24, 2015
Imprint: Hart Publishing Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9781509901944
Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing
Publication: September 24, 2015
Imprint: Hart Publishing
Language: English

Entick v Carrington is one of the canons of English public law and in 2015 it is 250 years old. In 1762 the Earl of Halifax, one of His Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State, despatched Nathan Carrington and three other of the King's messengers to John Entick's house in Stepney. They broke into his house, seizing his papers and causing significant damage. Why? Because he was said to have written seditious papers published in the Monitor. Entick sued Carrington and the other messengers for trespass. The defendants argued that the Earl of Halifax had given them legal authority to act as they had. Lord Camden ruled firmly in Entick's favour, holding that the warrant of a Secretary of State could not render lawful actions such as these which were otherwise unlawful.
The case is a canonical statement of the common law's commitment to the constitutional principle of the rule of law. In this collection, leading public lawyers reflect on the history of the case, the enduring importance of the legal principles for which it stands, and the broader implications of Entick v Carrington 250 years on.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Entick v Carrington is one of the canons of English public law and in 2015 it is 250 years old. In 1762 the Earl of Halifax, one of His Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State, despatched Nathan Carrington and three other of the King's messengers to John Entick's house in Stepney. They broke into his house, seizing his papers and causing significant damage. Why? Because he was said to have written seditious papers published in the Monitor. Entick sued Carrington and the other messengers for trespass. The defendants argued that the Earl of Halifax had given them legal authority to act as they had. Lord Camden ruled firmly in Entick's favour, holding that the warrant of a Secretary of State could not render lawful actions such as these which were otherwise unlawful.
The case is a canonical statement of the common law's commitment to the constitutional principle of the rule of law. In this collection, leading public lawyers reflect on the history of the case, the enduring importance of the legal principles for which it stands, and the broader implications of Entick v Carrington 250 years on.

More books from Bloomsbury Publishing

Cover of the book Disparities by
Cover of the book The Grand Gesture by
Cover of the book Blue Labour by
Cover of the book Gilles Deleuze, Postcolonial Theory, and the Philosophy of Limit by
Cover of the book The Canal Guide by
Cover of the book Crusader and Covenanter Cruiser Tanks 1939–45 by
Cover of the book Butterfly Wishes 1: The Wishing Wings by
Cover of the book The Wenger Revolution by
Cover of the book The Wisden Guide to International Cricket 2014 by
Cover of the book The End of Human Rights by
Cover of the book Everyday Iran by
Cover of the book The German Army 1939–45 (5) by
Cover of the book Education in Mexico, Central America and the Latin Caribbean by
Cover of the book Ceremonies of Innocence by
Cover of the book Wealth in the Ottoman and Post-Ottoman Balkans by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy