Equitable Sharing

Distributing the Benefits and Detriments of Democratic Society

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory, Reference & Language, Law
Cover of the book Equitable Sharing by Thomas Kleven, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Thomas Kleven ISBN: 9780739184370
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: December 16, 2013
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Thomas Kleven
ISBN: 9780739184370
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: December 16, 2013
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

Equitable Sharing: Distributing the Benefits and Detriments of Democratic Society argues that a principle of equitable sharing—one that requires the benefits and detriments of social life to be fairly distributed among all members of society—is fundamental to the concept of democracy and is implicit in the founding documents of the democratic society the United State purports to be. To illustrate the centrality of equitable sharing to democracy, this book examines the political philosophies of John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and John Rawls. Locke’s libertarianism, Mill’s utilitarianism, and Rawls’ egalitarianism represent major strains of Western democratic theory, and all contain a principle of equitable sharing in some form. To illustrate the centrality of equitable sharing to U.S. society, the book examines the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. While these documents do not set forth a particular version of equitable sharing, they contain elements of all of Locke’s, Mill’s and Rawls’ philosophies and evidence a commitment to equitable sharing as fundamental to the democratic society they contemplate.

The task of U.S. society throughout its existence has been to engage in an on-going dialogue that gives life to the commitment to equitable sharing set forth in its founding documents. As the elected representatives of the people and the repository of the powers through which to implement much of what equitable sharing requires, the primary responsibility for implementation rests with the legislative branch. This book argues that the Supreme Court, interacting with the public and the legislature, also has a meaningful role to play in the dialogue over the requirements of equitable sharing and can play this role in a manner consistent with democratic principles. This point is illustrated through a discussion of several contemporary issues: same sex marriage, racial integration in public schools, health care, and the regulation of the electoral process.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Equitable Sharing: Distributing the Benefits and Detriments of Democratic Society argues that a principle of equitable sharing—one that requires the benefits and detriments of social life to be fairly distributed among all members of society—is fundamental to the concept of democracy and is implicit in the founding documents of the democratic society the United State purports to be. To illustrate the centrality of equitable sharing to democracy, this book examines the political philosophies of John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and John Rawls. Locke’s libertarianism, Mill’s utilitarianism, and Rawls’ egalitarianism represent major strains of Western democratic theory, and all contain a principle of equitable sharing in some form. To illustrate the centrality of equitable sharing to U.S. society, the book examines the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. While these documents do not set forth a particular version of equitable sharing, they contain elements of all of Locke’s, Mill’s and Rawls’ philosophies and evidence a commitment to equitable sharing as fundamental to the democratic society they contemplate.

The task of U.S. society throughout its existence has been to engage in an on-going dialogue that gives life to the commitment to equitable sharing set forth in its founding documents. As the elected representatives of the people and the repository of the powers through which to implement much of what equitable sharing requires, the primary responsibility for implementation rests with the legislative branch. This book argues that the Supreme Court, interacting with the public and the legislature, also has a meaningful role to play in the dialogue over the requirements of equitable sharing and can play this role in a manner consistent with democratic principles. This point is illustrated through a discussion of several contemporary issues: same sex marriage, racial integration in public schools, health care, and the regulation of the electoral process.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Building States without Society by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book Communication Centers by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book From Mediation to Nation-Building by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book Russia and the World by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book Populating No Man’s Land by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book Ecopoetics and the Global Landscape by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book Post-Soviet Legacies and Conflicting Values in Europe by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book Reflecting on Service-Learning in Higher Education by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book Fugitive Slave Advertisements in The City Gazette by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book Charity in Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Traditions by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book Civil Society and World Regions by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book Corporate Power, Class Conflict, and the Crisis of the New Globalization by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book De-signing Design by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book A Matter of Honour by Thomas Kleven
Cover of the book Taking Socialism Seriously by Thomas Kleven
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy