Essays on Private Law

Foreign Law and Foreign Judgments

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Conflict of Laws, Court Rules
Cover of the book Essays on Private Law by Ian Baxter, University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Ian Baxter ISBN: 9781442633360
Publisher: University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division Publication: December 15, 1966
Imprint: Language: English
Author: Ian Baxter
ISBN: 9781442633360
Publisher: University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division
Publication: December 15, 1966
Imprint:
Language: English

This book contains a series of essays on conflict laws, including jurisdiction of the courts, choice of law, renvoi, property, recognition of family status, and recognition of foreign corporations. It is not a text-book, but an analysis and criticism of existing principles with recommendations for reform and for a different approach to the subject. In general, an approach is advocated that will be simpler and less abstract and doctrinaire than at present, and better integrated with the ordinary laws of the forum. The recommendations made could be thought of as principles on which to build a reform of conflict of laws or a model code.

The first two chapters deal with jurisdiction and choice of law, two distinct topics, with different considerations of policy, which have not always been kept distinct by judges and text writers. The third chapter considers certain questions of legal interpretation, mainly in the construction of money obligations expressed in a foreign currency. This shows a working out of the problems of contract analysis and interpretation which are dealt with more generally in other chapters. Another chapter discusses property law, a branch of the law which has been influenced, historically, by the doctrine of situs, and the recognition of status in family law and in corporation law. The concluding chapter draws together the main results of the preceding discussion and states from basic principles, one of which is that there is a need “for greater unity between the conflict rules and the general law,” and for “allowing, where appropriate, the influence of legal systems other than that of the forum.” Professor Baxter’s discussion clearly shows that the complexity of current legal theory can lead to unjust rulings in the courts, and his case for greater simplification is argued compellingly.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book contains a series of essays on conflict laws, including jurisdiction of the courts, choice of law, renvoi, property, recognition of family status, and recognition of foreign corporations. It is not a text-book, but an analysis and criticism of existing principles with recommendations for reform and for a different approach to the subject. In general, an approach is advocated that will be simpler and less abstract and doctrinaire than at present, and better integrated with the ordinary laws of the forum. The recommendations made could be thought of as principles on which to build a reform of conflict of laws or a model code.

The first two chapters deal with jurisdiction and choice of law, two distinct topics, with different considerations of policy, which have not always been kept distinct by judges and text writers. The third chapter considers certain questions of legal interpretation, mainly in the construction of money obligations expressed in a foreign currency. This shows a working out of the problems of contract analysis and interpretation which are dealt with more generally in other chapters. Another chapter discusses property law, a branch of the law which has been influenced, historically, by the doctrine of situs, and the recognition of status in family law and in corporation law. The concluding chapter draws together the main results of the preceding discussion and states from basic principles, one of which is that there is a need “for greater unity between the conflict rules and the general law,” and for “allowing, where appropriate, the influence of legal systems other than that of the forum.” Professor Baxter’s discussion clearly shows that the complexity of current legal theory can lead to unjust rulings in the courts, and his case for greater simplification is argued compellingly.

More books from University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division

Cover of the book Inventing Sam Slick by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book Power, Politics, and Principles by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book The Moselle by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book The Empire of the St. Lawrence by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book Seeing Through the Veil by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book Method in Metaphysics by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book Living With Brain Injury by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book Copyfight by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book I Bless You in My Heart by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book The Capacity To Judge by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book Northrop Frye and the Poetics of Process by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book Body of Vision by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book Urban Housing Markets by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book Devastation and Laughter by Ian Baxter
Cover of the book Bringing in the Sheaves by Ian Baxter
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy