Fault Lines of Globalization

Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Constitutional, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Fault Lines of Globalization by Hans Lindahl, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Hans Lindahl ISBN: 9780191511530
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: September 26, 2013
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Hans Lindahl
ISBN: 9780191511530
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: September 26, 2013
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

The question whether and how boundaries might individuate and thereby be constitutive features of any imaginable legal order has yet to be addressed in a systematic and comprehensive manner by legal and political theory. This book seeks to address this important omission, providing an original contribution to the debate about law in a global setting. Against the widely endorsed assumption that we are now moving towards law without boundaries, it argues that every imaginable legal order, global or otherwise, is bounded in space, time, membership, and content. The book is built up around three main insights. Firstly, that legal orders can best be understood as a form of joint action in which authorities mediate and uphold who ought to do what, where, and when with a view to realising the normative point of acting together. Secondly, that behaviour can call into question the boundaries that determine who ought to do what, where and when: a-legality. Thirdly, that this a-legality reveals boundaries as marking a limit and, to a lesser or greater extent, a fault line of the respective legal order. Legal boundaries reveal ways of ordering the who, what, where, and when of behaviour which have been excluded, yet which remain within the range of practical possibilities accessible to the collective: limits. However legal boundaries also intimate an order which exceeds the range of possibilities accessible to that collective - the fault line of the respective legal order. Careful analysis of a wide range of legal orders, including nomadism, Roman law, classical international law, ius gentium, multinationals, cyberlaw, lex mercatoria, the EU, global regimes of human rights, and space law validates this thesis. What sense, then, can we make of the normativity of the law, if there can be no inclusion without exclusion? Arguing that legal and political theories misunderstand how legal boundaries do their work of including and excluding, the book develops a normative theory of legal order which is alternative to both communitarianism and cosmopolitanism.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The question whether and how boundaries might individuate and thereby be constitutive features of any imaginable legal order has yet to be addressed in a systematic and comprehensive manner by legal and political theory. This book seeks to address this important omission, providing an original contribution to the debate about law in a global setting. Against the widely endorsed assumption that we are now moving towards law without boundaries, it argues that every imaginable legal order, global or otherwise, is bounded in space, time, membership, and content. The book is built up around three main insights. Firstly, that legal orders can best be understood as a form of joint action in which authorities mediate and uphold who ought to do what, where, and when with a view to realising the normative point of acting together. Secondly, that behaviour can call into question the boundaries that determine who ought to do what, where and when: a-legality. Thirdly, that this a-legality reveals boundaries as marking a limit and, to a lesser or greater extent, a fault line of the respective legal order. Legal boundaries reveal ways of ordering the who, what, where, and when of behaviour which have been excluded, yet which remain within the range of practical possibilities accessible to the collective: limits. However legal boundaries also intimate an order which exceeds the range of possibilities accessible to that collective - the fault line of the respective legal order. Careful analysis of a wide range of legal orders, including nomadism, Roman law, classical international law, ius gentium, multinationals, cyberlaw, lex mercatoria, the EU, global regimes of human rights, and space law validates this thesis. What sense, then, can we make of the normativity of the law, if there can be no inclusion without exclusion? Arguing that legal and political theories misunderstand how legal boundaries do their work of including and excluding, the book develops a normative theory of legal order which is alternative to both communitarianism and cosmopolitanism.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Twentieth-Century South Africa by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book The Audit Society by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book Defining Citizenship in Archaic Greece by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book Mental Disorders in Primary Care by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book Who Cares about Particle Physics? by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book On Liberty, Utilitarianism and Other Essays by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book The Mabinogion by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book The Dual Penal State by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book Towards a Better Global Economy by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book Oxford Handbook of Cardiac Nursing by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book Waves: A Very Short Introduction by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book The Oxford Companion to the Brontës by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book The Global History of Organic Farming by Hans Lindahl
Cover of the book King Sigismund of Poland and Martin Luther by Hans Lindahl
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy