From Same-Sex Marriage to Polygamy & Prostitution
(An Anthology of Disillusionment on the 21 Century Moral Code) Personal Reflection Essay
Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science
| Author: | Professor Leb Morr | ISBN: | 9781514478462 |
| Publisher: | Xlibris US | Publication: | March 31, 2016 |
| Imprint: | Xlibris US | Language: | English |
| Author: | Professor Leb Morr |
| ISBN: | 9781514478462 |
| Publisher: | Xlibris US |
| Publication: | March 31, 2016 |
| Imprint: | Xlibris US |
| Language: | English |
This is a personal reflection essay. An essay like a book may be on the same topic, but in breadth and details, it tries to embrace the subject without expounding on details as may be treated in a book; and being a personal reflection, the authors mind is the readers road map. The essays focal point is, if same-sex marriage has been given constitutional recognition in the United States, should this not logically lead to recognizing prostitution and the next complexity of pair bondingpolygamy? The essay examines the human rights and freedom of choice factors behind this and uses internationally recognized scenarios to illustrate the harmlessness of the latter two. To illustrate these points, practices of countries seen as the doctrinal peers of the United States are referenced and compared to the United States. Personal names are mentioned not as an attempt to denigrate any individual but rather as need for illustrative examples.
This is a personal reflection essay. An essay like a book may be on the same topic, but in breadth and details, it tries to embrace the subject without expounding on details as may be treated in a book; and being a personal reflection, the authors mind is the readers road map. The essays focal point is, if same-sex marriage has been given constitutional recognition in the United States, should this not logically lead to recognizing prostitution and the next complexity of pair bondingpolygamy? The essay examines the human rights and freedom of choice factors behind this and uses internationally recognized scenarios to illustrate the harmlessness of the latter two. To illustrate these points, practices of countries seen as the doctrinal peers of the United States are referenced and compared to the United States. Personal names are mentioned not as an attempt to denigrate any individual but rather as need for illustrative examples.
