Hard Eurosceptics can never be convinced of the case for European integration - or can they?

or can they

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Hard Eurosceptics can never be convinced of the case for European integration - or can they? by Nataliya Gudz, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Nataliya Gudz ISBN: 9783640184217
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: October 8, 2008
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Nataliya Gudz
ISBN: 9783640184217
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: October 8, 2008
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1.5, College of Europe, Natolin Campus (EU Institutions, Politics and Policies), language: English, abstract: Signed fifty years ago, the Treaty of Rome proclaimed an 'ever closer union' by 'establishing a common market and progressive approximation of the economic policies of member states' . This approximation had, however, a negative side effect -opposition to market integration, and after the sequence of enlargements - ardent resistance to any further European integration. Moreover, since the Maastricht Treaty, Eurosceptics have exploited a new battleground: 'defence of national community' in response to the erosion of national sovereignty and to the heightened job insecurity caused by market unification and liberalization process. As enlargement process was taking its course, Euroscepticism grew into a potent feature of the political landscape across the EU, by not only shaking confidence in the process of further enlargement, but also 'provoking several attempts to re-theorize the process of European integration' . Thus, for example, 'soft eurosceptics' (definition proposed by Paul Taggart and Aleks Szczerbiak ) opposed to the 'EU's current or future planned trajectory based on the future extension of competencies' , whereas the main objective of their 'hard counterparts' was 'tantamount to being de facto opposed to EU membership' . In this paper we'll try to analyse a phenomenon of hard Euroscepticism in the European Union by presenting Danish and British cases. We'll demonstrate that sometimes hard Eurosceptic parties can be convinced of the case for European integration, despite their ardent anti-EU positions.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1.5, College of Europe, Natolin Campus (EU Institutions, Politics and Policies), language: English, abstract: Signed fifty years ago, the Treaty of Rome proclaimed an 'ever closer union' by 'establishing a common market and progressive approximation of the economic policies of member states' . This approximation had, however, a negative side effect -opposition to market integration, and after the sequence of enlargements - ardent resistance to any further European integration. Moreover, since the Maastricht Treaty, Eurosceptics have exploited a new battleground: 'defence of national community' in response to the erosion of national sovereignty and to the heightened job insecurity caused by market unification and liberalization process. As enlargement process was taking its course, Euroscepticism grew into a potent feature of the political landscape across the EU, by not only shaking confidence in the process of further enlargement, but also 'provoking several attempts to re-theorize the process of European integration' . Thus, for example, 'soft eurosceptics' (definition proposed by Paul Taggart and Aleks Szczerbiak ) opposed to the 'EU's current or future planned trajectory based on the future extension of competencies' , whereas the main objective of their 'hard counterparts' was 'tantamount to being de facto opposed to EU membership' . In this paper we'll try to analyse a phenomenon of hard Euroscepticism in the European Union by presenting Danish and British cases. We'll demonstrate that sometimes hard Eurosceptic parties can be convinced of the case for European integration, despite their ardent anti-EU positions.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Menschenbilder im interkulturellen Vergleich by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Familiengesundheitspflege - ein Konzept für die Altenpflege by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Jean Siméon Chardin - Ein Vergleich der Stillleben des Früh- und Spätwerks by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Matteo Bandellos Novellensammlung by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Storytelling im Englischunterricht der Primarstufe by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Positionspapier der 'kursbewahrenden' Position für eine Adaption des Grundgesetzes im Zuge der deutschen Wiedervereinigung by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Folgen von Informationsasymmetrien für die Preisbildung an Finanzmärkten by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Singles und ihre sozialen Netzwerke by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Die Kronzeugenregelung und die ihr entgegenstehenden strafrechtlichen Prinzipien by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Einfluss ausgewählter psychischer Störungen auf die Suizidalität by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Optimierung von Automobilteilen mit Hilfe von evolutionären Algorithmen und der Finite-Elemente-Methode by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Humes skeptische Betrachtung des Skeptizismus by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Das Verschwinden des Subjekts in der Diskurstheorie von Michel Foucault? by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Vernachlässigung von Kindern by Nataliya Gudz
Cover of the book Sozialkompetenztrainings. 'Training sozialer Fertigkeiten' und 'Ich schaffs' im Vergleich by Nataliya Gudz
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy