Hume's Critique of Religion: 'Sick Men's Dreams'

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Epistemology, Religious
Cover of the book Hume's Critique of Religion: 'Sick Men's Dreams' by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien, Springer Netherlands
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien ISBN: 9789400766150
Publisher: Springer Netherlands Publication: October 10, 2013
Imprint: Springer Language: English
Author: Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
ISBN: 9789400766150
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Publication: October 10, 2013
Imprint: Springer
Language: English

In this volume, authors Alan Bailey and Dan O’Brien examine the full import of David Hume’s arguments and the context of the society in which his work came to fruition. They analyze the nuanced natured of Hume's philosophical discourse and provide an informed look into his position on the possible content and rational justification of religious belief.

The authors first detail the pressures and forms of repression that confronted any 18th century thinker wishing to challenge publicly the truth of Christian theism.  From there, they offer an overview of Hume's writings on religion, paying particular attention to the inter-relationships between the various works. They show that Hume's writings on religion are best seen as an artfully constructed web of irreligious argument that seeks to push forward a radical outlook, one that only emerges when the attention shifts from the individual sections of the web to its overall structure and context. Even though there is no explicit denial in any of Hume's published writings or private correspondence of the existence of God, the implications of his arguments often seem to point strongly towards atheism.

David Hume was one of the leading British critics of Christianity and all forms of religion at a time when public utterances or published writings denying the truth of Christianity were liable to legal prosecution. His philosophical and historical writings offer a sustained and remarkably open critique of religion that is unmatched by any previous author writing in English.  Yet, despite Hume’s widespread reputation amongst his contemporaries for extreme irreligion, the subtle and measured manner in which he presents his position means that it remains far from clear how radical his views actually were.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In this volume, authors Alan Bailey and Dan O’Brien examine the full import of David Hume’s arguments and the context of the society in which his work came to fruition. They analyze the nuanced natured of Hume's philosophical discourse and provide an informed look into his position on the possible content and rational justification of religious belief.

The authors first detail the pressures and forms of repression that confronted any 18th century thinker wishing to challenge publicly the truth of Christian theism.  From there, they offer an overview of Hume's writings on religion, paying particular attention to the inter-relationships between the various works. They show that Hume's writings on religion are best seen as an artfully constructed web of irreligious argument that seeks to push forward a radical outlook, one that only emerges when the attention shifts from the individual sections of the web to its overall structure and context. Even though there is no explicit denial in any of Hume's published writings or private correspondence of the existence of God, the implications of his arguments often seem to point strongly towards atheism.

David Hume was one of the leading British critics of Christianity and all forms of religion at a time when public utterances or published writings denying the truth of Christianity were liable to legal prosecution. His philosophical and historical writings offer a sustained and remarkably open critique of religion that is unmatched by any previous author writing in English.  Yet, despite Hume’s widespread reputation amongst his contemporaries for extreme irreligion, the subtle and measured manner in which he presents his position means that it remains far from clear how radical his views actually were.

More books from Springer Netherlands

Cover of the book Examination of the Small Intestine by Means of Duodenal Intubation by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book Hegel—From Foundation to System by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book Creep Behaviour in Cracked Sections of Fibre Reinforced Concrete by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book Matter and Mind by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book Melt Rheology and its Applications in the Plastics Industry by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book The Philosophy of Biology by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book Aristotle and The Philosophy of Law: Theory, Practice and Justice by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book Landscapes and Landforms of France by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book A Little Less Arctic by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book The Inherent Right of Self-Defence in International Law by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book Econodynamics by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book Modelling of Environmental Chemical Exposure and Risk by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
Cover of the book A Diplomat’s Handbook of International Law and Practice by Alan Bailey, Dan O'Brien
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy