Hymns to the Goddess

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, New Age, History, Fiction & Literature
Cover of the book Hymns to the Goddess by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon), Library of Alexandria
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon) ISBN: 9781465581129
Publisher: Library of Alexandria Publication: March 8, 2015
Imprint: Language: English
Author: John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
ISBN: 9781465581129
Publisher: Library of Alexandria
Publication: March 8, 2015
Imprint:
Language: English

THE Goddess or Devī (as the Hindus call Her) is God (as the Western worshippers address Him) in Its Mother aspect. The latter not uncommonly deem such attribution of feminine quality to be "heathenish"; but this condemnation (for the criticism has, of course, this intendment) is itself singularly foolish in that it is thereby implied that of two sets of terms (neither of which is in its strict sense applicable to the Deity as the of forms), one is, in fact, a more correct description than the other. In the Navaratneśvara it is said: "That Devī, who is existence, consciousness, and bliss, should be thought of as a female or as a male, or as pure Brahman. In reality, however, She is neither male nor neuter (that is to say, that She is not bound to any particular form)." No one contends that the Brahmatattva in the supreme abode beyond appearances is masculine as opposed to feminine, or the latter as contrasted with the former. Like all else in this matter, words are but the babbling endeavour of our plane to express that which is above it. It is not easy, then, to explain the condemnation except upon the assumption that those who pronounce it think their mother's sex to be inferior to their own, and that thus Deity is unworthily described by any other terms than those of masculine excellence. But Hindus, who ever place the name of mother before that of father, and to whom garbha dhāraapoābhyām pitur mātā gariyasi, have no partiality for such mistaken notions. On the other hand, it is possible that they might not understand the Christian expression "Mother of God," nor approve it even after they had learnt the limited and special sense which theology gives to this epithet. The Tāntrika would least of all admit the insufficiency of the conception of God as Mother. For the Devī manifests in his own mother, in his prakti (as he calls his wife), and in all women. As the Kubjikā Tantra says: "Whosoever has seen the feet of woman let him worship them as those of his guru" (Strinām pādatalam dritvāguruvadbhāvayet sadā). Whilst male and female are both Her aspects, yet Śakti is, in a sense, said to be more revealed in the female than in the male form. And so the Muamāla Tantra says: "Wherever there is a śaktī (female), there I am." On account of this greater manifestation, women are called Śakti. From this, however, it must not be supposed that Śakti is less present in such forms as Śiva and Ka and others. If, as the author of the Tantra Tattva says, a sādhaka who is a worshipper of the Kamūrti desires to see Him as Kālī, Bhagavān, who fulfils the desires of devotees, will assume that form. All forms come into existence upon the manifestation of consciousness in the play of Her whose substance is consciousness.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

THE Goddess or Devī (as the Hindus call Her) is God (as the Western worshippers address Him) in Its Mother aspect. The latter not uncommonly deem such attribution of feminine quality to be "heathenish"; but this condemnation (for the criticism has, of course, this intendment) is itself singularly foolish in that it is thereby implied that of two sets of terms (neither of which is in its strict sense applicable to the Deity as the of forms), one is, in fact, a more correct description than the other. In the Navaratneśvara it is said: "That Devī, who is existence, consciousness, and bliss, should be thought of as a female or as a male, or as pure Brahman. In reality, however, She is neither male nor neuter (that is to say, that She is not bound to any particular form)." No one contends that the Brahmatattva in the supreme abode beyond appearances is masculine as opposed to feminine, or the latter as contrasted with the former. Like all else in this matter, words are but the babbling endeavour of our plane to express that which is above it. It is not easy, then, to explain the condemnation except upon the assumption that those who pronounce it think their mother's sex to be inferior to their own, and that thus Deity is unworthily described by any other terms than those of masculine excellence. But Hindus, who ever place the name of mother before that of father, and to whom garbha dhāraapoābhyām pitur mātā gariyasi, have no partiality for such mistaken notions. On the other hand, it is possible that they might not understand the Christian expression "Mother of God," nor approve it even after they had learnt the limited and special sense which theology gives to this epithet. The Tāntrika would least of all admit the insufficiency of the conception of God as Mother. For the Devī manifests in his own mother, in his prakti (as he calls his wife), and in all women. As the Kubjikā Tantra says: "Whosoever has seen the feet of woman let him worship them as those of his guru" (Strinām pādatalam dritvāguruvadbhāvayet sadā). Whilst male and female are both Her aspects, yet Śakti is, in a sense, said to be more revealed in the female than in the male form. And so the Muamāla Tantra says: "Wherever there is a śaktī (female), there I am." On account of this greater manifestation, women are called Śakti. From this, however, it must not be supposed that Śakti is less present in such forms as Śiva and Ka and others. If, as the author of the Tantra Tattva says, a sādhaka who is a worshipper of the Kamūrti desires to see Him as Kālī, Bhagavān, who fulfils the desires of devotees, will assume that form. All forms come into existence upon the manifestation of consciousness in the play of Her whose substance is consciousness.

More books from Library of Alexandria

Cover of the book Michelangelo by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book Anarchism and Socialism by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos; Or, Quadripartite Being Four Books of The influence of the Stars by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book Plum Punch: Life at Home by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book The Mystery of Metropolisville by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book Under the Mendips: A Tale by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book La Dame De Monsoreau (Complete) by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book The Mystery of Mary by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book Achtundvierzig Briefe Von Johann Gottlieb Fichte Und Seinen Verwandten by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book The Canadian Dominion by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book A Year's Journey Through France and Part of Spain, 1777 (Complete) by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book East O' the Sun and West O' the Moon by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book Old Melbourne Memories by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book The Key to Theosophy: Being A Clear Exposition, In The Form of Question and Answer of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
Cover of the book Judith Shakespeare: Her Love Affairs and Other Adventures by John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon)
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy