Inheriting As People Think It Should Be

From Money To Mementos

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice, Education & Teaching, Administration
Cover of the book Inheriting As People Think It Should Be by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence, Information Age Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence ISBN: 9781623962975
Publisher: Information Age Publishing Publication: June 1, 2013
Imprint: Information Age Publishing Language: English
Author: Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
ISBN: 9781623962975
Publisher: Information Age Publishing
Publication: June 1, 2013
Imprint: Information Age Publishing
Language: English

What obligations to each other do people have or think they have? That question comes up in relation to family and marriage relationships, to law, and to moral reasoning. This novel and highly readable book takes it up in relation to inheritances: to what people think they should leave or be left, who should receive what, when, how, and why. Making the book novel is its range. Here are views about more than money. Covered are also houses, land and, an often neglected but emotionladen area, the personal and often indivisible things that mean one is remembered as an individual. Making it novel also is its emphasis throughout on meanings and on what people see as matters of choice or flexibility. Even in countries where the legal codes specify who should receive what after death (many European and most Islamic codes allow far less choice than Britishbased law does), people still have room for decisions about what they give away to various heirs or spend before death. What makes the book highly readable? One reason is its timeliness. Currently lively, for example, are debates over parents balancing their own needs and wishes against those of their children (“spending the kids’ inheritance”, in one description). Another is the book’s style. The writing is straightforward. Theory is not neglected but there is an absence of jargon. The material is also mostly based on narratives: on people’s own descriptions of arrangements that “worked well” or “did not work well” and on why they thought so. That base makes the book far from dry and far from being an account only of negative feelings, objections, challenges, and family rifts. It also makes it more relevant at times of indecision or misunderstanding. In short, a book for many readers, both within the social sciences and beyond it.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

What obligations to each other do people have or think they have? That question comes up in relation to family and marriage relationships, to law, and to moral reasoning. This novel and highly readable book takes it up in relation to inheritances: to what people think they should leave or be left, who should receive what, when, how, and why. Making the book novel is its range. Here are views about more than money. Covered are also houses, land and, an often neglected but emotionladen area, the personal and often indivisible things that mean one is remembered as an individual. Making it novel also is its emphasis throughout on meanings and on what people see as matters of choice or flexibility. Even in countries where the legal codes specify who should receive what after death (many European and most Islamic codes allow far less choice than Britishbased law does), people still have room for decisions about what they give away to various heirs or spend before death. What makes the book highly readable? One reason is its timeliness. Currently lively, for example, are debates over parents balancing their own needs and wishes against those of their children (“spending the kids’ inheritance”, in one description). Another is the book’s style. The writing is straightforward. Theory is not neglected but there is an absence of jargon. The material is also mostly based on narratives: on people’s own descriptions of arrangements that “worked well” or “did not work well” and on why they thought so. That base makes the book far from dry and far from being an account only of negative feelings, objections, challenges, and family rifts. It also makes it more relevant at times of indecision or misunderstanding. In short, a book for many readers, both within the social sciences and beyond it.

More books from Information Age Publishing

Cover of the book Analyzing Influences by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book Physics Teaching and Learning by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book Learning from Media by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book Beyond Retention by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book ESL, EFL and Bilingual Education by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book Doing PDS by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book Volume 1: Research Syntheses by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book Challenging Status Quo Retrenchment by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book History Wars and The Classroom by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book Engaging African American Males in Community Colleges by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book Social Education in Asia by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book Technologies of Government by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book The Impact of the Laboratory and Technology on Learning and Teaching Science K16 by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book Organizational Performance in a Nutshell by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
Cover of the book Killing ideas softly? by Jacqueline J. Goodnow, Jeanette A. Lawrence
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy