Journalists or Criminals? Attorney General Eric Holder's Testimony before the Committee and the Justice Department's National Security Leak Investigative Techniques

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Journalists or Criminals? Attorney General Eric Holder's Testimony before the Committee and the Justice Department's National Security Leak Investigative Techniques by Progressive Management, Progressive Management
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Progressive Management ISBN: 9781301935499
Publisher: Progressive Management Publication: August 4, 2013
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Progressive Management
ISBN: 9781301935499
Publisher: Progressive Management
Publication: August 4, 2013
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

This is the majority Republican staff report to Chairman Bob Goodlatte of the House Committee on the Judiciary issued on July 31, 2013 about the controversy over Attorney General Eric Holder's testimony. The Executive Summary states:

The recent controversy surrounding Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr. and his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee is the result of deliberate efforts by Mr. Holder to avoid answering for questionable decisions and actions in the performance of his official duties. In particular, Mr. Holder's testimony was an attempt, through verbal gymnastics, to circumvent proper congressional oversight and accountability by distorting the truth about the Justice Department's investigative techniques targeting journalists.

Mr. Holder assured the Committee, in sworn testimony, that "[w]ith regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something that I have ever been involved, heard of, or would think would be a wise policy'" Yet, as the Committee learned after its May 15, 2013, hearing, in 2010, the Justice Department obtained a search warrant for Fox News Chief Washington Correspondent James Rosen's emails by swearing to a federal court that Mr. Rosen was a co-conspirator in a national security leak investigation. When questioned by the committee about the obvious clash between his testimony and the truth, Mr. Holder refused to answer questions from the Committee. Finally, after weeks of delay, Mr. Holder responded to the Committee's inquiry. However, Mr. Holder's responses do not ameliorate our concern that his testimony to the committee was deceptive and misleading. we take little comfort in Mr. Holder's assurances to us now that the Department never intended to prosecute Mr. Rosen when it labeled him a criminal suspect in 2010.

Tarnishing a journalist as a suspect in a national security investigation is not something that should be taken lightly. Espionage is a serious federal crime, punishable by up to a decade in prison. In essence, the Justice Department dangled Mr. Rosen over a cliff. But the American people were then assured by Mr. Holder that this was appropriate because there was never a potential of him falling to his doom.

In response to the nationwide disapproval of his tactics, Mr. Holder has proposed new rules and regulations to control the Justice Department's dealings with the media. While some of these proposals are welcome, the committee is dismayed that Mr. Holder suggests that congress change the law to stop him from continuing to do what he has done in the past - distort federal law to fit his investigative prerogatives. Mr. Holder proposes that congress amend the privacy Protection Act of 1980, a law intended to prohibit the government from searching a journalist's records unless the journalist is a criminal suspect. Mr. Holder maintains that the law contains a loophole that permits the government to do what it did in the Rosen case. But there is no such loophole. If Mr. Holder believes that the law should not permit the Justice Department to do what it did, he never should have authorized the search warrant in the first place. The committee believes that Mr. Holder is trying to deflect responsibility for his actions by presenting a distorted reading of the law. Changing the law is not the solution for misuse of the law.

The Committee finds that Mr. Holder's sworn testimony in the Rosen matter was deceptive and misleading. No amount of law-making can restore credibility and professionalism to the Justice Department in the wake of these revelations. The only way to achieve this goal is through an improvement in the quality of leadership at the Justice Department.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This is the majority Republican staff report to Chairman Bob Goodlatte of the House Committee on the Judiciary issued on July 31, 2013 about the controversy over Attorney General Eric Holder's testimony. The Executive Summary states:

The recent controversy surrounding Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr. and his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee is the result of deliberate efforts by Mr. Holder to avoid answering for questionable decisions and actions in the performance of his official duties. In particular, Mr. Holder's testimony was an attempt, through verbal gymnastics, to circumvent proper congressional oversight and accountability by distorting the truth about the Justice Department's investigative techniques targeting journalists.

Mr. Holder assured the Committee, in sworn testimony, that "[w]ith regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something that I have ever been involved, heard of, or would think would be a wise policy'" Yet, as the Committee learned after its May 15, 2013, hearing, in 2010, the Justice Department obtained a search warrant for Fox News Chief Washington Correspondent James Rosen's emails by swearing to a federal court that Mr. Rosen was a co-conspirator in a national security leak investigation. When questioned by the committee about the obvious clash between his testimony and the truth, Mr. Holder refused to answer questions from the Committee. Finally, after weeks of delay, Mr. Holder responded to the Committee's inquiry. However, Mr. Holder's responses do not ameliorate our concern that his testimony to the committee was deceptive and misleading. we take little comfort in Mr. Holder's assurances to us now that the Department never intended to prosecute Mr. Rosen when it labeled him a criminal suspect in 2010.

Tarnishing a journalist as a suspect in a national security investigation is not something that should be taken lightly. Espionage is a serious federal crime, punishable by up to a decade in prison. In essence, the Justice Department dangled Mr. Rosen over a cliff. But the American people were then assured by Mr. Holder that this was appropriate because there was never a potential of him falling to his doom.

In response to the nationwide disapproval of his tactics, Mr. Holder has proposed new rules and regulations to control the Justice Department's dealings with the media. While some of these proposals are welcome, the committee is dismayed that Mr. Holder suggests that congress change the law to stop him from continuing to do what he has done in the past - distort federal law to fit his investigative prerogatives. Mr. Holder proposes that congress amend the privacy Protection Act of 1980, a law intended to prohibit the government from searching a journalist's records unless the journalist is a criminal suspect. Mr. Holder maintains that the law contains a loophole that permits the government to do what it did in the Rosen case. But there is no such loophole. If Mr. Holder believes that the law should not permit the Justice Department to do what it did, he never should have authorized the search warrant in the first place. The committee believes that Mr. Holder is trying to deflect responsibility for his actions by presenting a distorted reading of the law. Changing the law is not the solution for misuse of the law.

The Committee finds that Mr. Holder's sworn testimony in the Rosen matter was deceptive and misleading. No amount of law-making can restore credibility and professionalism to the Justice Department in the wake of these revelations. The only way to achieve this goal is through an improvement in the quality of leadership at the Justice Department.

More books from Progressive Management

Cover of the book NASA Space Technology Report: The Antarctic Search for Meteorites - A Model for Deep Space Exploration, An Astronaut's Report Comparing ANSMET to Space Flight, Recommendations by Progressive Management
Cover of the book The Rationale of Political Assassinations: Context, Logic, Landscape and General Trends, Causes, Facilitators, Consequences, Policy Implications, Coups D'etat, Typologies, Targets, Heads of State by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Deterrence During Hostilities: A New "Triad" for the Middle East - Strategic Deterrence, Retaliatory, Preemptive, Nuclear, Chemical, Deception, Psychological Operations, Shaping Enemy Expectations by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century U.S. Military Manuals: Corps Operations FM 3-92 (FM 100-15) - Headquarters Organization, Command Post and Cell, Full Spectrum Operations (Professional Format Series) by Progressive Management
Cover of the book The 31 Initiatives: A Study in Air Force - Army Cooperation - Air Defense, Rear Area Operations, Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses, Special Forces, Joint Munitions Development, Combat Techniques by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century FEMA Study Course: Exercise Evaluation and Improvement Planning (IS-130) - After Action Reports, Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century Understanding Cancer Toolkit: Cancer Clusters, Carcinogenesis, Cancer and the Environment, Studies of Suspected Clusters, Interaction of Environmental Factors and Genes by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Imperial Policy and the Integration of Gaul into the Roman Empire: Roman Legions Conquered Tribes, Military Foundation, Political Inclusiveness and Roman Tolerance, Economic Benefits of Empire by Progressive Management
Cover of the book History of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Volume Five: The McNamara Ascendancy 1961-1965 - Berlin Wall, Bay of Pigs Fiasco, Cuban Missile Crisis, Vietnam, Nuclear Test Ban by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Reading the Enemy's Mail: Origins and Development of U.S. Army Tactical Radio Intelligence in World War II, European Theater of Operations - Wartime Operations, Direction Finding Equipment by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 2012 Biomass Energy Guide: Biomass Multi-Year Program Plan and Biomass Biennial Review Report - Biomass to Bioenergy Conversion, Energy Crops, Algae, Wastes, Feedstock Supply, Markets, Transportation by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Counterinsurgency Leadership in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Beyond: David Petraeus, Paula Broadwell, COIN, Commands, Officer Development, Generalship, Winning in Afghanistan by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century Cancer Sourcebook: Myelodysplastic / Myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN) Neoplasms, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), aCML, Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia (JMML), MDS/MPN-UC by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Don't Forget About Dedicated Sea Mine Countermeasures (MCM) - Scenario for Disaster, History, Current Force, Threat to American Economic Security, Shipping Lane Protection, Straits of Malacca, Hormuz by Progressive Management
Cover of the book The Politics of Naval Innovation: Studies of Historical Cases of How Technologically Advanced Systems Went From the Drawing Board to the Fleet, Tomahawk Cruise Missile, AEGIS Combat System by Progressive Management
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy