Journalists or Criminals? Attorney General Eric Holder's Testimony before the Committee and the Justice Department's National Security Leak Investigative Techniques

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Journalists or Criminals? Attorney General Eric Holder's Testimony before the Committee and the Justice Department's National Security Leak Investigative Techniques by Progressive Management, Progressive Management
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Progressive Management ISBN: 9781301935499
Publisher: Progressive Management Publication: August 4, 2013
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Progressive Management
ISBN: 9781301935499
Publisher: Progressive Management
Publication: August 4, 2013
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

This is the majority Republican staff report to Chairman Bob Goodlatte of the House Committee on the Judiciary issued on July 31, 2013 about the controversy over Attorney General Eric Holder's testimony. The Executive Summary states:

The recent controversy surrounding Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr. and his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee is the result of deliberate efforts by Mr. Holder to avoid answering for questionable decisions and actions in the performance of his official duties. In particular, Mr. Holder's testimony was an attempt, through verbal gymnastics, to circumvent proper congressional oversight and accountability by distorting the truth about the Justice Department's investigative techniques targeting journalists.

Mr. Holder assured the Committee, in sworn testimony, that "[w]ith regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something that I have ever been involved, heard of, or would think would be a wise policy'" Yet, as the Committee learned after its May 15, 2013, hearing, in 2010, the Justice Department obtained a search warrant for Fox News Chief Washington Correspondent James Rosen's emails by swearing to a federal court that Mr. Rosen was a co-conspirator in a national security leak investigation. When questioned by the committee about the obvious clash between his testimony and the truth, Mr. Holder refused to answer questions from the Committee. Finally, after weeks of delay, Mr. Holder responded to the Committee's inquiry. However, Mr. Holder's responses do not ameliorate our concern that his testimony to the committee was deceptive and misleading. we take little comfort in Mr. Holder's assurances to us now that the Department never intended to prosecute Mr. Rosen when it labeled him a criminal suspect in 2010.

Tarnishing a journalist as a suspect in a national security investigation is not something that should be taken lightly. Espionage is a serious federal crime, punishable by up to a decade in prison. In essence, the Justice Department dangled Mr. Rosen over a cliff. But the American people were then assured by Mr. Holder that this was appropriate because there was never a potential of him falling to his doom.

In response to the nationwide disapproval of his tactics, Mr. Holder has proposed new rules and regulations to control the Justice Department's dealings with the media. While some of these proposals are welcome, the committee is dismayed that Mr. Holder suggests that congress change the law to stop him from continuing to do what he has done in the past - distort federal law to fit his investigative prerogatives. Mr. Holder proposes that congress amend the privacy Protection Act of 1980, a law intended to prohibit the government from searching a journalist's records unless the journalist is a criminal suspect. Mr. Holder maintains that the law contains a loophole that permits the government to do what it did in the Rosen case. But there is no such loophole. If Mr. Holder believes that the law should not permit the Justice Department to do what it did, he never should have authorized the search warrant in the first place. The committee believes that Mr. Holder is trying to deflect responsibility for his actions by presenting a distorted reading of the law. Changing the law is not the solution for misuse of the law.

The Committee finds that Mr. Holder's sworn testimony in the Rosen matter was deceptive and misleading. No amount of law-making can restore credibility and professionalism to the Justice Department in the wake of these revelations. The only way to achieve this goal is through an improvement in the quality of leadership at the Justice Department.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This is the majority Republican staff report to Chairman Bob Goodlatte of the House Committee on the Judiciary issued on July 31, 2013 about the controversy over Attorney General Eric Holder's testimony. The Executive Summary states:

The recent controversy surrounding Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr. and his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee is the result of deliberate efforts by Mr. Holder to avoid answering for questionable decisions and actions in the performance of his official duties. In particular, Mr. Holder's testimony was an attempt, through verbal gymnastics, to circumvent proper congressional oversight and accountability by distorting the truth about the Justice Department's investigative techniques targeting journalists.

Mr. Holder assured the Committee, in sworn testimony, that "[w]ith regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something that I have ever been involved, heard of, or would think would be a wise policy'" Yet, as the Committee learned after its May 15, 2013, hearing, in 2010, the Justice Department obtained a search warrant for Fox News Chief Washington Correspondent James Rosen's emails by swearing to a federal court that Mr. Rosen was a co-conspirator in a national security leak investigation. When questioned by the committee about the obvious clash between his testimony and the truth, Mr. Holder refused to answer questions from the Committee. Finally, after weeks of delay, Mr. Holder responded to the Committee's inquiry. However, Mr. Holder's responses do not ameliorate our concern that his testimony to the committee was deceptive and misleading. we take little comfort in Mr. Holder's assurances to us now that the Department never intended to prosecute Mr. Rosen when it labeled him a criminal suspect in 2010.

Tarnishing a journalist as a suspect in a national security investigation is not something that should be taken lightly. Espionage is a serious federal crime, punishable by up to a decade in prison. In essence, the Justice Department dangled Mr. Rosen over a cliff. But the American people were then assured by Mr. Holder that this was appropriate because there was never a potential of him falling to his doom.

In response to the nationwide disapproval of his tactics, Mr. Holder has proposed new rules and regulations to control the Justice Department's dealings with the media. While some of these proposals are welcome, the committee is dismayed that Mr. Holder suggests that congress change the law to stop him from continuing to do what he has done in the past - distort federal law to fit his investigative prerogatives. Mr. Holder proposes that congress amend the privacy Protection Act of 1980, a law intended to prohibit the government from searching a journalist's records unless the journalist is a criminal suspect. Mr. Holder maintains that the law contains a loophole that permits the government to do what it did in the Rosen case. But there is no such loophole. If Mr. Holder believes that the law should not permit the Justice Department to do what it did, he never should have authorized the search warrant in the first place. The committee believes that Mr. Holder is trying to deflect responsibility for his actions by presenting a distorted reading of the law. Changing the law is not the solution for misuse of the law.

The Committee finds that Mr. Holder's sworn testimony in the Rosen matter was deceptive and misleading. No amount of law-making can restore credibility and professionalism to the Justice Department in the wake of these revelations. The only way to achieve this goal is through an improvement in the quality of leadership at the Justice Department.

More books from Progressive Management

Cover of the book The U.S. Forest Service: An Overview - History, Fast Facts and Key Points, Forestry Mission, Wildfires, Forests, and Communities, The National Fire Plan and Fire Management Programs by Progressive Management
Cover of the book F-111 Systems Engineering Case Study: Technical Details, Program History, Combat Operational History of Controversial Fighter-Attack Aircraft by Progressive Management
Cover of the book History of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: The War in Vietnam 1960-1968, Part 1 - Eisenhower and Kennedy, Laos, Communist Offensive, McNamara and the Buildup, Defoliation, Fall of Diem by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Vulnerability of the United States Railroad System to Terrorist Attacks: Risks to Amtrak Passenger Trains, Tank Cars, Cyber Attacks, Historic Lac-Megantic Oil Train Derailment, Screening Measures by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Eisenhower: The Suez Crisis - An Appraisal of Presidential Leadership, The Aswan Dam Problem, Diplomatic Marathon, Outbreak of War, Alliance with Britain and France in Peril, Final Resolution by Progressive Management
Cover of the book U.S. Army War College Guide to National Security Issues, Volume I: Theory of War and Strategy - von Clausewitz, Mao, Sun Tzu, Che Guevara, Machiavelli, Luttwak - 5th Edition by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century U.S. Military Documents: Air Force Intelligence - Force Protection (FP), Predictive Battlespace Awareness (PBA), Open Source Intelligence (OSINT), ISR, Contingency Unit by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Stability Economics: The Economic Foundations of Security in Post-conflict Environments - Iraq and Afghanistan, Shari'a Compliant Finance, Odierno, Petraeus, Shining Path Guerrillas by Progressive Management
Cover of the book The Story of Self-Repairing Flight Control Systems: NASA and Air Force Partnership to Test SRFCS Damage Adaptive Technology, Intelligent Flight Control System by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Combating Daesh: A Socially Unconventional Strategy - Alternative Perspective on the Islamic State, ISIS, ISIL, Unconventional Warfare, Human Domain Mapping, Iraqi Baath Party and Republican Guard by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Venezuela in Perspective: Orientation Guide and Cultural Orientation: Geography, History, Economy, Society, Rural and Urban Life, Security, Religion, Hugo Chavez, Simon Bolivar, Traditions by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Sustaining Souls: Work of the U.S. Army Chaplain Corps, Soldiers and Families, Religious Formation and Chaplain Identity, Ethos, Commander Assessment of Effectiveness by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Challenging Nuclear Abolition: Analysis Contrasting Nuclear Modernization with the Goal of President Obama to Eliminate Nuclear Weapons, Complete List of All U.S. Nuclear Warheads by Progressive Management
Cover of the book NASA Human Spaceflight Astronaut Health Research for Exploration and Manned Mars Missions, Risk Report WSN-07, Human Computer Interaction, Task Design, Injury from Dynamic Loads, Food System Illness by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century U.S. Military Manuals: Rifle Marksmanship Field Manual (M16A1, M16A2/3, M16A4, and M4 Carbine) FM 3-22.9 - FM 23-9 (Value-Added Professional Format Series) by Progressive Management
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy