Just War or Just Peace?

Humanitarian Intervention and International Law

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, International, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Just War or Just Peace? by Simon Chesterman, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Simon Chesterman ISBN: 9780191021817
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: January 25, 2001
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Simon Chesterman
ISBN: 9780191021817
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: January 25, 2001
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

The question of the legality of humanitarian intervention is, at first blush, a simple one. The Charter of the United Nations clearly prohibits the use of force, with the only exceptions being self-defence and enforcement actions authorized by the Security Council. There are, however, long-standing arguments that a right of unilateral intervention pre-existed the Charter. This book, which won the ASIL Certificate of Merit in 2002, begins with an examination of the genealogy of that right, and arguments that it might have survived the passage of the Charter, either through a loophole in Article 2(4) or as part of customary international law. It has also been argued that certain `illegitimate' regimes lose the attributes of sovereignty and thereby the protection given by the prohibition of the use of force. None of these arguments is found to have merit, either in principle or in the practice of states. A common justification for a right of unilateral humanitarian intervention concerns the failure of the collective security mechanism created after the Second World War. Chapters 4 and 5, therefore, examine Security Council activism in the 1990s, notable for the plasticity of the circumstances in which the Council was prepared to assert its primary responsibility for international peace and security, and the contingency of its actions on the willingness of states to carry them out. This reduction of the Council's role from substantive to formal partly explains the recourse to unilateralism in that decade, most spectacularly in relation to the situation in Kosovo. Crucially, the book argues that such unilateral enforcement is not a substitute for but the opposite of collective action. Though often presented as the only alternative to inaction, incorporating a `right' of intervention would lead to more such interventions being undertaken in bad faith, it would be incoherent as a principle, and it would be inimical to the emergence of an international rule of law.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The question of the legality of humanitarian intervention is, at first blush, a simple one. The Charter of the United Nations clearly prohibits the use of force, with the only exceptions being self-defence and enforcement actions authorized by the Security Council. There are, however, long-standing arguments that a right of unilateral intervention pre-existed the Charter. This book, which won the ASIL Certificate of Merit in 2002, begins with an examination of the genealogy of that right, and arguments that it might have survived the passage of the Charter, either through a loophole in Article 2(4) or as part of customary international law. It has also been argued that certain `illegitimate' regimes lose the attributes of sovereignty and thereby the protection given by the prohibition of the use of force. None of these arguments is found to have merit, either in principle or in the practice of states. A common justification for a right of unilateral humanitarian intervention concerns the failure of the collective security mechanism created after the Second World War. Chapters 4 and 5, therefore, examine Security Council activism in the 1990s, notable for the plasticity of the circumstances in which the Council was prepared to assert its primary responsibility for international peace and security, and the contingency of its actions on the willingness of states to carry them out. This reduction of the Council's role from substantive to formal partly explains the recourse to unilateralism in that decade, most spectacularly in relation to the situation in Kosovo. Crucially, the book argues that such unilateral enforcement is not a substitute for but the opposite of collective action. Though often presented as the only alternative to inaction, incorporating a `right' of intervention would lead to more such interventions being undertaken in bad faith, it would be incoherent as a principle, and it would be inimical to the emergence of an international rule of law.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book The Nostalgic Imagination by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Optimal Redistributive Taxation by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Hobbes on Politics and Religion by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Fallibilism: Evidence and Knowledge by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Philosophers of Our Times by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Agamemnon in Performance 458 BC to AD 2004 by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book China, Russia, and Twenty-First Century Global Geopolitics by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Behavioral Methods in Consciousness Research by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Psoriatic Arthritis by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Twilight of the Idols by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Medical Nihilism by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book A Dictionary of World History by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Stressors in the Marine Environment by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Leviathan by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book The Business of Systems Integration by Simon Chesterman
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy