Marbury v. Madison

The Origins and Legacy of Judicial Review, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Constitutional, History, Americas, United States, Colonial Period (1600-1775), 19th Century
Cover of the book Marbury v. Madison by William E. Nelson, University Press of Kansas
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: William E. Nelson ISBN: 9780700626410
Publisher: University Press of Kansas Publication: May 19, 2018
Imprint: University Press of Kansas Language: English
Author: William E. Nelson
ISBN: 9780700626410
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
Publication: May 19, 2018
Imprint: University Press of Kansas
Language: English

On the surface, the case itself seems a minor one at best. William Marbury, a last-minute judicial appointee of outgoing Federalist president John Adams, demanded redress from the Supreme Court when his commission was not delivered. But Chief Justice John Marshall could clearly see the danger his demand posed for a weak court filled with Federalist judges. Wary of the Court’s standing with the new Republican administration of Thomas Jefferson, Marshall hit upon a solution that was both principled and pragmatic. He determined that while Marbury was justified in his suit, the law on which his claim was based was in conflict with the Constitution. It was the first time that the Court struck down an act of Congress as unconstitutional, thus establishing the doctrine of judicial review that designates the Court as chief interpreter of the Constitution.

Nelson relates the story behind Marbury and explains why it is a foundational case for understanding the Supreme Court. He reveals how Marshall deftly avoided a dangerous political confrontation between the executive and judicial branches by upholding the rule of law. Nelson also shows how Marshall managed to shore up the Court’s prestige and power rather than have it serve partisan political agendas.

Nelson expands upon his original historical analysis by providing a more complete and nuanced account of eighteenth-century constitutionalism and the early development of judicial review. The new material includes chapters on nullification of legislation in local courts, James Otis’s articulation of the doctrine of judicial review in the Writs of Assistance Case, the use of this doctrine in response to the Stamp Act and Townshend Act, and the expansion of judicial review in the State Cases. This revised and expanded edition provides a fuller picture of colonial America and a richer understanding of Marshall’s foundational decision.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

On the surface, the case itself seems a minor one at best. William Marbury, a last-minute judicial appointee of outgoing Federalist president John Adams, demanded redress from the Supreme Court when his commission was not delivered. But Chief Justice John Marshall could clearly see the danger his demand posed for a weak court filled with Federalist judges. Wary of the Court’s standing with the new Republican administration of Thomas Jefferson, Marshall hit upon a solution that was both principled and pragmatic. He determined that while Marbury was justified in his suit, the law on which his claim was based was in conflict with the Constitution. It was the first time that the Court struck down an act of Congress as unconstitutional, thus establishing the doctrine of judicial review that designates the Court as chief interpreter of the Constitution.

Nelson relates the story behind Marbury and explains why it is a foundational case for understanding the Supreme Court. He reveals how Marshall deftly avoided a dangerous political confrontation between the executive and judicial branches by upholding the rule of law. Nelson also shows how Marshall managed to shore up the Court’s prestige and power rather than have it serve partisan political agendas.

Nelson expands upon his original historical analysis by providing a more complete and nuanced account of eighteenth-century constitutionalism and the early development of judicial review. The new material includes chapters on nullification of legislation in local courts, James Otis’s articulation of the doctrine of judicial review in the Writs of Assistance Case, the use of this doctrine in response to the Stamp Act and Townshend Act, and the expansion of judicial review in the State Cases. This revised and expanded edition provides a fuller picture of colonial America and a richer understanding of Marshall’s foundational decision.

More books from University Press of Kansas

Cover of the book Battleground Alaska by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book Jacqueline Kennedy by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book Empire of the People by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book A Third Term for FDR by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book Lizzie Borden on Trial by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book Losing Binh Dinh by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book Barbara Bush by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book The Jury in America by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book Federalism on Trial by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book Commanding the Army of the Potomac by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book Chief Executive to Chief Justice by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book Two Cities by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book The One-Party Presidential Contest by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book The Passenger Cases and the Commerce Clause by William E. Nelson
Cover of the book Congress by William E. Nelson
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy