Money, Politics, and the Constitution: Beyond Citizens United

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Constitutional
Cover of the book Money, Politics, and the Constitution: Beyond Citizens United by , The Century Foundation, Inc.
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9780870785283
Publisher: The Century Foundation, Inc. Publication: April 28, 2011
Imprint: The Century Foundation Press Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9780870785283
Publisher: The Century Foundation, Inc.
Publication: April 28, 2011
Imprint: The Century Foundation Press
Language: English
Top Constitutional scholars launch a new jurisprudence to curb the rise of unfettered money in politics post-Citizens United. What is next for the First Amendment? And how can we advance a vision of the Constitution as a charter for a vibrant, participatory democracy? In the U.S. Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, five justices ruled that corporations and unions had a constitutional right to spend unlimited sums in elections, and in so doing overturned decades of precedent and dozens of laws. The ruling earned banner headlines, a sharp State of the Union rebuke, and public disapproval hovering near 80 percent in the polls. In the 2010 election that followed, independent spend­ing spiked, much of it done secretly. The decision ranks among the Court’s most controversial and consequential. This volume of essays, which is cosponsored with the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, is an attempt to map out the complex labyrinth that led to Citizens United, and to explore where this decision may lead. The chapters in it arose from a symposium sponsored by the Brennan Centers just nine weeks after the Citizens United decision was announced.About the book: Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of UC Irvine School of Law and author of The Conservative Assault on the Constitution: “A brilliant collection of essays on one of the most important contemporary constitutional issues: when can and should the government be able to regulate campaign spending? … If there is to be a new jurisprudence in this area, this book is likely its foundation.” About the conference that sparked the book: Stanley Fish, The New York Times: “A-list First Amendment scholars … As a result of what had been said and proposed, something in the world might actually change.”
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Top Constitutional scholars launch a new jurisprudence to curb the rise of unfettered money in politics post-Citizens United. What is next for the First Amendment? And how can we advance a vision of the Constitution as a charter for a vibrant, participatory democracy? In the U.S. Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, five justices ruled that corporations and unions had a constitutional right to spend unlimited sums in elections, and in so doing overturned decades of precedent and dozens of laws. The ruling earned banner headlines, a sharp State of the Union rebuke, and public disapproval hovering near 80 percent in the polls. In the 2010 election that followed, independent spend­ing spiked, much of it done secretly. The decision ranks among the Court’s most controversial and consequential. This volume of essays, which is cosponsored with the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, is an attempt to map out the complex labyrinth that led to Citizens United, and to explore where this decision may lead. The chapters in it arose from a symposium sponsored by the Brennan Centers just nine weeks after the Citizens United decision was announced.About the book: Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of UC Irvine School of Law and author of The Conservative Assault on the Constitution: “A brilliant collection of essays on one of the most important contemporary constitutional issues: when can and should the government be able to regulate campaign spending? … If there is to be a new jurisprudence in this area, this book is likely its foundation.” About the conference that sparked the book: Stanley Fish, The New York Times: “A-list First Amendment scholars … As a result of what had been said and proposed, something in the world might actually change.”

More books from Constitutional

Cover of the book Proportionality and the Rule of Law by
Cover of the book Parliament and the Law by
Cover of the book Poland's Constitutional Breakdown by
Cover of the book Closing the Courthouse Door by
Cover of the book Freedom and Political Order by
Cover of the book Evolution of a Revolution by
Cover of the book Initiation au droit constitutionnel by
Cover of the book Supreme Court Economic Review, Volume 22 by
Cover of the book Constitutional Preambles by
Cover of the book Landscapes of the Secular by
Cover of the book Irreparable Harm by
Cover of the book The Right to Information Act 2005 by
Cover of the book Was ist Menschenwürde? Das Grundgesetz der Bundesrepublik, die Charta der Europäischen Union und der Vertrag über eine Verfassung für Europa im Vergleich by
Cover of the book The Continuity of Legal Systems in Theory and Practice by
Cover of the book Dimensions of Dignity by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy