Moral Judgments as Educated Intuitions

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Ethics & Moral Philosophy, Science & Nature, Science
Cover of the book Moral Judgments as Educated Intuitions by Hanno Sauer, The MIT Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Hanno Sauer ISBN: 9780262337267
Publisher: The MIT Press Publication: March 6, 2017
Imprint: The MIT Press Language: English
Author: Hanno Sauer
ISBN: 9780262337267
Publisher: The MIT Press
Publication: March 6, 2017
Imprint: The MIT Press
Language: English

An argument that moral reasoning plays a crucial role in moral judgment through episodes of rational reflection that have established patterns for automatic judgment foundation.

Rationalists about the psychology of moral judgment argue that moral cognition has a rational foundation. Recent challenges to this account, based on findings in the empirical psychology of moral judgment, contend that moral thinking has no rational basis. In this book, Hanno Sauer argues that moral reasoning does play a role in moral judgment—but not, as is commonly supposed, because conscious reasoning produces moral judgments directly. Moral reasoning figures in the acquisition, formation, maintenance, and reflective correction of moral intuitions. Sauer proposes that when we make moral judgments we draw on a stable repertoire of intuitions about what is morally acceptable, which we have acquired over the course of our moral education—episodes of rational reflection that have established patterns for automatic judgment foundation. Moral judgments are educated and rationally amenable moral intuitions.

Sauer engages extensively with the empirical evidence on the psychology of moral judgment and argues that it can be shown empirically that reasoning plays a crucial role in moral judgment. He offers detailed counterarguments to the anti-rationalist challenge (the claim that reason and reasoning play no significant part in morality and moral judgment) and the emotionist challenge (the argument for the emotional basis of moral judgment). Finally, he uses Joshua Greene's Dual Process model of moral cognition to test the empirical viability and normative persuasiveness of his account of educated intuitions. Sauer shows that moral judgments can be automatic, emotional, intuitive, and rational at the same time.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

An argument that moral reasoning plays a crucial role in moral judgment through episodes of rational reflection that have established patterns for automatic judgment foundation.

Rationalists about the psychology of moral judgment argue that moral cognition has a rational foundation. Recent challenges to this account, based on findings in the empirical psychology of moral judgment, contend that moral thinking has no rational basis. In this book, Hanno Sauer argues that moral reasoning does play a role in moral judgment—but not, as is commonly supposed, because conscious reasoning produces moral judgments directly. Moral reasoning figures in the acquisition, formation, maintenance, and reflective correction of moral intuitions. Sauer proposes that when we make moral judgments we draw on a stable repertoire of intuitions about what is morally acceptable, which we have acquired over the course of our moral education—episodes of rational reflection that have established patterns for automatic judgment foundation. Moral judgments are educated and rationally amenable moral intuitions.

Sauer engages extensively with the empirical evidence on the psychology of moral judgment and argues that it can be shown empirically that reasoning plays a crucial role in moral judgment. He offers detailed counterarguments to the anti-rationalist challenge (the claim that reason and reasoning play no significant part in morality and moral judgment) and the emotionist challenge (the argument for the emotional basis of moral judgment). Finally, he uses Joshua Greene's Dual Process model of moral cognition to test the empirical viability and normative persuasiveness of his account of educated intuitions. Sauer shows that moral judgments can be automatic, emotional, intuitive, and rational at the same time.

More books from The MIT Press

Cover of the book The Materiality of Interaction by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book The Sciences of the Artificial by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book Cognitive Pluralism by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book Origins of Human Communication by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book Playing Smart by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book The Digital Plenitude by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book Laws, Outlaws, and Terrorists by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book Machine Art in the Twentieth Century by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book The Illusion of Conscious Will by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book International Relations in the Cyber Age by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book Dolphin Communication and Cognition by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book Novacene by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book Voice Leading by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book Creating Language by Hanno Sauer
Cover of the book Can We Price Carbon? by Hanno Sauer
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy