Moral Theory and Moral Judgments in Medical Ethics

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Ethics & Moral Philosophy
Cover of the book Moral Theory and Moral Judgments in Medical Ethics by , Springer Netherlands
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9789400927155
Publisher: Springer Netherlands Publication: December 6, 2012
Imprint: Springer Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9789400927155
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Publication: December 6, 2012
Imprint: Springer
Language: English

principles. A second solution to this problem is to develop a scale for weighing the significance of the conflicting principles in a given case and for concluding which action should be adopted because it is supported by the weightier considerations in that case. Such a solution seems more realistic than the lexical ordering approach, but the development of such a scale is a problematic task. Still other, more complex solutions are possible. Which is the best solution to this problem of conflicting principles of bioethics? We need a moral theory to answer that question. This is the first reason for concluding that the principles of bioethics are not the true foundations of justified judgment in bioethics. What is the problem of the unclear scope and implications of the principles of bioethics and how can an appeal to moral theory help deal with that problem? The scope of a bioethical principle is the range of cases in which it applies. The implications of a bioethical principle are the conclusions to be derived from that principle in those cases in which it applies. It is clear from a review of the discussions in bioethics that there are major unclarities about the scope and implications of each of the principles. Consider, for example, the principle of autonomy.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

principles. A second solution to this problem is to develop a scale for weighing the significance of the conflicting principles in a given case and for concluding which action should be adopted because it is supported by the weightier considerations in that case. Such a solution seems more realistic than the lexical ordering approach, but the development of such a scale is a problematic task. Still other, more complex solutions are possible. Which is the best solution to this problem of conflicting principles of bioethics? We need a moral theory to answer that question. This is the first reason for concluding that the principles of bioethics are not the true foundations of justified judgment in bioethics. What is the problem of the unclear scope and implications of the principles of bioethics and how can an appeal to moral theory help deal with that problem? The scope of a bioethical principle is the range of cases in which it applies. The implications of a bioethical principle are the conclusions to be derived from that principle in those cases in which it applies. It is clear from a review of the discussions in bioethics that there are major unclarities about the scope and implications of each of the principles. Consider, for example, the principle of autonomy.

More books from Springer Netherlands

Cover of the book Europe, America, and Technology: Philosophical Perspectives by
Cover of the book AIDS up to the Year 2000 by
Cover of the book The Current Trends of Optics and Photonics by
Cover of the book From scientific instrument to industrial machine by
Cover of the book Cultural Memories by
Cover of the book Epigenetic Epidemiology by
Cover of the book Reflexive Epistemology by
Cover of the book Fundamentals of Cardiac Pacing by
Cover of the book The Sociology of Return Migration: A Bibliographic Essay by
Cover of the book Drug Use Trajectories Among Minority Youth by
Cover of the book Weather and Climate Extremes by
Cover of the book Reductionism and Cultural Being by
Cover of the book Essays on Anaphora by
Cover of the book Multidimensional Ranking by
Cover of the book Trends in Stem Cell Proliferation and Cancer Research by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy