Necessity Lost

Modality and Logic in Early Analytic Philosophy, Volume 1

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Logic, Epistemology
Cover of the book Necessity Lost by Sanford Shieh, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Sanford Shieh ISBN: 9780192568816
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: March 21, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Sanford Shieh
ISBN: 9780192568816
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: March 21, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

A long tradition, going back to Aristotle, conceives of logic in terms of necessity and possibility: a deductive argument is correct if it is not possible for the conclusion to be false when the premises are true. A relatively unknown feature of the analytic tradition in philosophy is that, at its very inception, this venerable conception of the relation between logic and necessity and possibility - the concepts of modality - was put into question. The founders of analytic philosophy, Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, held that these concepts are empty: there are no genuine distinctions among the necessary, the possible, and the actual. In this book, the first of two volumes, Sanford Shieh investigates the grounds of this position and its consequences for Frege's and Russell's conceptions of logic. The grounds lie in doctrines on truth, thought, and knowledge, as well as on the relation between mind and reality, that are central to the philosophies of Frege and Russell, and are of enduring philosophical interest. The upshot of this opposition to modality is that logic is fundamental, and, to be coherent, modal concepts would have to be reconstructed in logical terms. This rejection of modality in early analytic philosophy remains of contemporary significance, though the coherence of modal concepts is rarely questioned nowadays because it is generally assumed that suspicion of modality derives from logical positivism, which has not survived philosophical scrutiny. The anti-modal arguments of Frege and Russell, however, have nothing to do with positivism and remain a challenge to the contemporary acceptance of modal notions.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

A long tradition, going back to Aristotle, conceives of logic in terms of necessity and possibility: a deductive argument is correct if it is not possible for the conclusion to be false when the premises are true. A relatively unknown feature of the analytic tradition in philosophy is that, at its very inception, this venerable conception of the relation between logic and necessity and possibility - the concepts of modality - was put into question. The founders of analytic philosophy, Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, held that these concepts are empty: there are no genuine distinctions among the necessary, the possible, and the actual. In this book, the first of two volumes, Sanford Shieh investigates the grounds of this position and its consequences for Frege's and Russell's conceptions of logic. The grounds lie in doctrines on truth, thought, and knowledge, as well as on the relation between mind and reality, that are central to the philosophies of Frege and Russell, and are of enduring philosophical interest. The upshot of this opposition to modality is that logic is fundamental, and, to be coherent, modal concepts would have to be reconstructed in logical terms. This rejection of modality in early analytic philosophy remains of contemporary significance, though the coherence of modal concepts is rarely questioned nowadays because it is generally assumed that suspicion of modality derives from logical positivism, which has not survived philosophical scrutiny. The anti-modal arguments of Frege and Russell, however, have nothing to do with positivism and remain a challenge to the contemporary acceptance of modal notions.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book The Kill by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Anticorruption in History by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Shakespeare, Court Dramatist by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Magna Carta: A Very Short Introduction by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book The UN Secretary-General and the Security Council by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Self and Other by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book The Roman Military Base at Dura-Europos, Syria by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Newman on Vatican II by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Late Victorian Gothic Tales by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Early Days of X-ray Crystallography by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Cerebral Cortex by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Miss Julie and Other Plays by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Impact of Market Forces on Addictive Substances and Behaviours by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 14 by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Communism: A Very Short Introduction by Sanford Shieh
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy