Necessity Lost

Modality and Logic in Early Analytic Philosophy, Volume 1

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Logic, Epistemology
Cover of the book Necessity Lost by Sanford Shieh, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Sanford Shieh ISBN: 9780192568816
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: March 21, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Sanford Shieh
ISBN: 9780192568816
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: March 21, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

A long tradition, going back to Aristotle, conceives of logic in terms of necessity and possibility: a deductive argument is correct if it is not possible for the conclusion to be false when the premises are true. A relatively unknown feature of the analytic tradition in philosophy is that, at its very inception, this venerable conception of the relation between logic and necessity and possibility - the concepts of modality - was put into question. The founders of analytic philosophy, Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, held that these concepts are empty: there are no genuine distinctions among the necessary, the possible, and the actual. In this book, the first of two volumes, Sanford Shieh investigates the grounds of this position and its consequences for Frege's and Russell's conceptions of logic. The grounds lie in doctrines on truth, thought, and knowledge, as well as on the relation between mind and reality, that are central to the philosophies of Frege and Russell, and are of enduring philosophical interest. The upshot of this opposition to modality is that logic is fundamental, and, to be coherent, modal concepts would have to be reconstructed in logical terms. This rejection of modality in early analytic philosophy remains of contemporary significance, though the coherence of modal concepts is rarely questioned nowadays because it is generally assumed that suspicion of modality derives from logical positivism, which has not survived philosophical scrutiny. The anti-modal arguments of Frege and Russell, however, have nothing to do with positivism and remain a challenge to the contemporary acceptance of modal notions.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

A long tradition, going back to Aristotle, conceives of logic in terms of necessity and possibility: a deductive argument is correct if it is not possible for the conclusion to be false when the premises are true. A relatively unknown feature of the analytic tradition in philosophy is that, at its very inception, this venerable conception of the relation between logic and necessity and possibility - the concepts of modality - was put into question. The founders of analytic philosophy, Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, held that these concepts are empty: there are no genuine distinctions among the necessary, the possible, and the actual. In this book, the first of two volumes, Sanford Shieh investigates the grounds of this position and its consequences for Frege's and Russell's conceptions of logic. The grounds lie in doctrines on truth, thought, and knowledge, as well as on the relation between mind and reality, that are central to the philosophies of Frege and Russell, and are of enduring philosophical interest. The upshot of this opposition to modality is that logic is fundamental, and, to be coherent, modal concepts would have to be reconstructed in logical terms. This rejection of modality in early analytic philosophy remains of contemporary significance, though the coherence of modal concepts is rarely questioned nowadays because it is generally assumed that suspicion of modality derives from logical positivism, which has not survived philosophical scrutiny. The anti-modal arguments of Frege and Russell, however, have nothing to do with positivism and remain a challenge to the contemporary acceptance of modal notions.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Surnames, DNA, and Family History by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book The United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Principles of International Criminal Law by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Health Care Management by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Neuroscience in Education by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Extreme Speech and Democracy by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Film Noir: A Very Short Introduction by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book The First Men in the Moon by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Law: A Very Short Introduction by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Samuel Beckett and the Politics of Aftermath by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book Transnational Commercial Law by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book International Politics and Institutions in Time by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book The Impossible by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book The Art of Eloquence by Sanford Shieh
Cover of the book A Theory of International Organization by Sanford Shieh
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy