Party Leadership under Stalin and Khrushchev

Party Officials and the Soviet State, 1948–1964

Nonfiction, History, Asian, Russia, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International
Cover of the book Party Leadership under Stalin and Khrushchev by Jonathan Harris, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Jonathan Harris ISBN: 9781498528399
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: September 15, 2018
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Jonathan Harris
ISBN: 9781498528399
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: September 15, 2018
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

This study demonstrates that the full time party officials of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) used the term “party leadership” to both disguise and signal their efforts to lead the Communists who manned the Soviet state. In 1946, Stalin had made the newly formed Council of Ministers of the USSR, led by its Bureau (Presidium) directly responsible for planning and administering the Soviet economy. As a result, the full time officials clashed constantly and publicly over the relative importance of their direct intervention in production as opposed to ideological education and personnel management in their efforts to provide “party leadership” of the state from 1946 until 1964. Zhdanov and Malenkov clashed over the issue until Zhdanov’s death in 1948 and Malenkov clashed with Khrushchev over the same issue from 1949 until Stalin’s death in 1953. This conflict became more explicit once Malenkov was named Chairman of the Council of Ministers and Khrushchev first secretary of the CC/CPSU in 1953 and continued until Malenkov’s ouster in 1955. Khrushchev clashed with Chairman Bulganin over the same issue from 1955 until 1958. Khrushchev’s decision to replace Bulganin as Chairman of the Council of Ministers not only complicated the discussion of party officials’ role but led to a series of extremely contradictory reforms. Khrushchev simultaneously bolstered party officials’ capacity to intervene directly in industrial production and strengthened the Council of Ministers’ control over the same process. The ensuring administrative confusion, when coupled with Khrushchev’s overt disdain for the ideological education of Communists helped to undermine his authority and led to the decision of his colleagues to oust him in 1964.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This study demonstrates that the full time party officials of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) used the term “party leadership” to both disguise and signal their efforts to lead the Communists who manned the Soviet state. In 1946, Stalin had made the newly formed Council of Ministers of the USSR, led by its Bureau (Presidium) directly responsible for planning and administering the Soviet economy. As a result, the full time officials clashed constantly and publicly over the relative importance of their direct intervention in production as opposed to ideological education and personnel management in their efforts to provide “party leadership” of the state from 1946 until 1964. Zhdanov and Malenkov clashed over the issue until Zhdanov’s death in 1948 and Malenkov clashed with Khrushchev over the same issue from 1949 until Stalin’s death in 1953. This conflict became more explicit once Malenkov was named Chairman of the Council of Ministers and Khrushchev first secretary of the CC/CPSU in 1953 and continued until Malenkov’s ouster in 1955. Khrushchev clashed with Chairman Bulganin over the same issue from 1955 until 1958. Khrushchev’s decision to replace Bulganin as Chairman of the Council of Ministers not only complicated the discussion of party officials’ role but led to a series of extremely contradictory reforms. Khrushchev simultaneously bolstered party officials’ capacity to intervene directly in industrial production and strengthened the Council of Ministers’ control over the same process. The ensuring administrative confusion, when coupled with Khrushchev’s overt disdain for the ideological education of Communists helped to undermine his authority and led to the decision of his colleagues to oust him in 1964.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book The Anthropology of Sport and Human Movement by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development in Emerging Economies by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book New Trends in Russian Political Mentality by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Colonial Constitutionalism by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Beyond Mechanism by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Regional Integration and Modernity by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Confronting Disaster by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Rural Voices by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book The Relevance of Higher Education by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Migrant Cartographies by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Same-Sex Marriage in the Americas by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Contemporary Africa and the Foreseeable World Order by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Ethos Clash in Israeli Society by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Puerto Rican Identity, Political Development, and Democracy in New York, 1960–1990 by Jonathan Harris
Cover of the book Unfolding Ambition in Senate Primary Elections by Jonathan Harris
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy