Paul Ricoeur's Hermeneutics and the Discourse of Mark 13

Appropriating the Apocalyptic

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Religious
Cover of the book Paul Ricoeur's Hermeneutics and the Discourse of Mark 13 by Peter C. de Vries, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Peter C. de Vries ISBN: 9781498512299
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: December 14, 2016
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Peter C. de Vries
ISBN: 9781498512299
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: December 14, 2016
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

The apocalyptic discourse of Mark 13 predicts that cataclysmic events will occur within the generation of Jesus’ contemporaries, but readers today know these events have not taken place. Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics enables a reader to understand this text as a presentation of truth rather than as a failed prediction. Ricoeur argues that the meaning of a text is not defined by the author’s intention nor by the reader’s reception, but by the text itself. Therefore, although Mark 13 was originally understood literally, today’s reader is able to read it as metaphor, and to discern latent meaning that is present in the text. As Ricoeur explains, metaphor associates previously unrelated concepts and creates new, multiple meanings. In doing, metaphor is able to present truth, not as a verifiable presentation of the world, but as a novel manifestation of the world. Mark 13 functions as metaphor because of a double dissonance: first between the configured world of the text and the lived world of the reader, and second between claim that Jesus is able to predict when the events will take place (v. 30) and the assertion that he is not able to do so (v. 32). One option for the metaphorical meaning that Mark 13 offers for today’s reader is the perception of the presence of forces that challenge and subvert powers which appear to be dominant, and which deceive, destroy, and persecute.

This book will appeal to two sets of readers. First, scholars who study New Testament apocalyptic texts and the eschatological expectations of the early church will appreciate a new approach to a challenging subject matter. Second, Ricoeur scholars who focus upon the religious aspects of his work will enjoy the employment of his interpretive approach on a Biblical genre that has heretofore receive only cursory attention.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The apocalyptic discourse of Mark 13 predicts that cataclysmic events will occur within the generation of Jesus’ contemporaries, but readers today know these events have not taken place. Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics enables a reader to understand this text as a presentation of truth rather than as a failed prediction. Ricoeur argues that the meaning of a text is not defined by the author’s intention nor by the reader’s reception, but by the text itself. Therefore, although Mark 13 was originally understood literally, today’s reader is able to read it as metaphor, and to discern latent meaning that is present in the text. As Ricoeur explains, metaphor associates previously unrelated concepts and creates new, multiple meanings. In doing, metaphor is able to present truth, not as a verifiable presentation of the world, but as a novel manifestation of the world. Mark 13 functions as metaphor because of a double dissonance: first between the configured world of the text and the lived world of the reader, and second between claim that Jesus is able to predict when the events will take place (v. 30) and the assertion that he is not able to do so (v. 32). One option for the metaphorical meaning that Mark 13 offers for today’s reader is the perception of the presence of forces that challenge and subvert powers which appear to be dominant, and which deceive, destroy, and persecute.

This book will appeal to two sets of readers. First, scholars who study New Testament apocalyptic texts and the eschatological expectations of the early church will appreciate a new approach to a challenging subject matter. Second, Ricoeur scholars who focus upon the religious aspects of his work will enjoy the employment of his interpretive approach on a Biblical genre that has heretofore receive only cursory attention.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Prisoner Reentry and Social Capital by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book Cultural Studies, Education, and Youth by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book The Contested Floodplain by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book American Democracy by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book The Politics of Care in Habermas and Derrida by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book Who Must Die in Rwanda's Genocide? by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book The Life and Times of Francis Cabot Lowell, 1775–1817 by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book Function-Based Spatiality and the Development of Korean Communities in Japan by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book Historical Sociology and Eastern European Development by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book Fractured Parties by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book W.E.B. Du Bois and the Problems of the Twenty-First Century by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book A Philosophy of Sacred Nature by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book Human Ecodynamics in the North Atlantic by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book Heroes, Heroines, and Everything in Between by Peter C. de Vries
Cover of the book Recovering Christian Realism by Peter C. de Vries
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy