Polycentricity, Islam, and Development

Potentials and Challenges in Pakistan

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International
Cover of the book Polycentricity, Islam, and Development by Anas Malik, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Anas Malik ISBN: 9781498539760
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: December 26, 2017
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Anas Malik
ISBN: 9781498539760
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: December 26, 2017
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

Development analysts often focus on the role of “the state” in making the right rules by which to govern society, assuming that governance is exclusively or mainly the work of the central government authority. The reality in many developing countries, particularly those with weak central government authorities, is that governance happens through diverse rules and in many centers of decision-making, in ways that are formal and informal, official and unofficial. This real-world polycentricity can be dysfunctional or productive, depending in part on shared understandings between decision-making entities about how to relate to each other. Those shared understandings come from cultural backgrounds, historical interactions, and other sources.

Political economist Anas Malik argues that well-functioning polycentricity in developing countries depends in part on the shared understandings between official government entities and unofficial units that provide collective choice in particular arenas. In Muslim-majority contexts, the Islamic tradition – contrary to the image of a top-down, single-voiced religious law- provides ample resources supporting shared understandings that accommodate diverse rules and collective choice units. Pakistan, the largest Muslim-majority country at its founding, provides an important case. After building on the development literature to suggest a typology of collective choice units in developing countries, Malik explores resources in the Islamic tradition that support polycentric governance. The book then examines major deliberations in Pakistan’s history, particularly through documented inquiries into serious political crises such as sectarian religious agitation and civil war, and through a selective survey of types of jurisdictions and collective choice units. Malik argues that there are significant polycentric understandings in Pakistan’s historical lineage, but that these are heavily contested. While there is potential for polycentric development in Pakistan, the viability of polycentric order is constrained by countering forces and contextual factors.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Development analysts often focus on the role of “the state” in making the right rules by which to govern society, assuming that governance is exclusively or mainly the work of the central government authority. The reality in many developing countries, particularly those with weak central government authorities, is that governance happens through diverse rules and in many centers of decision-making, in ways that are formal and informal, official and unofficial. This real-world polycentricity can be dysfunctional or productive, depending in part on shared understandings between decision-making entities about how to relate to each other. Those shared understandings come from cultural backgrounds, historical interactions, and other sources.

Political economist Anas Malik argues that well-functioning polycentricity in developing countries depends in part on the shared understandings between official government entities and unofficial units that provide collective choice in particular arenas. In Muslim-majority contexts, the Islamic tradition – contrary to the image of a top-down, single-voiced religious law- provides ample resources supporting shared understandings that accommodate diverse rules and collective choice units. Pakistan, the largest Muslim-majority country at its founding, provides an important case. After building on the development literature to suggest a typology of collective choice units in developing countries, Malik explores resources in the Islamic tradition that support polycentric governance. The book then examines major deliberations in Pakistan’s history, particularly through documented inquiries into serious political crises such as sectarian religious agitation and civil war, and through a selective survey of types of jurisdictions and collective choice units. Malik argues that there are significant polycentric understandings in Pakistan’s historical lineage, but that these are heavily contested. While there is potential for polycentric development in Pakistan, the viability of polycentric order is constrained by countering forces and contextual factors.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Cosmopolitanism and Tourism by Anas Malik
Cover of the book Van Gogh among the Philosophers by Anas Malik
Cover of the book Distributive Politics in Developing Countries by Anas Malik
Cover of the book Political and Investment Risk in the International Oil and Gas Industry by Anas Malik
Cover of the book Peoples of the Earth by Anas Malik
Cover of the book Consuming Agency and Desire in Romance by Anas Malik
Cover of the book After the Deluge by Anas Malik
Cover of the book Transition in Power by Anas Malik
Cover of the book And Why Not? by Anas Malik
Cover of the book Beyond Free Speech and Propaganda by Anas Malik
Cover of the book Novel Perspectives on German-Language Comics Studies by Anas Malik
Cover of the book Fugitive Slave Advertisements in The City Gazette by Anas Malik
Cover of the book Action Reconceptualized by Anas Malik
Cover of the book The Santillana Codes by Anas Malik
Cover of the book The Deconstitutionalization of America by Anas Malik
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy