Presumption of Innocence in Peril

A Comparative Critical Perspective

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Criminal law, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Presumption of Innocence in Peril by Anthony Gray, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Anthony Gray ISBN: 9781498554114
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: November 8, 2017
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Anthony Gray
ISBN: 9781498554114
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: November 8, 2017
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

This book explains the historical significance and introduction of the presumption of innocence into common law legal systems. It explains that the presumption should be seen as reflecting notions of moral comfort around judgment of others. Specifically, when one is asked to make a judgment about the guilt or otherwise of a person accused of wrongdoing, the default position should be to do nothing. This reflects the very serious consequences of what we do when we decide someone is guilty of wrongdoing and is not a step to be taken lightly. Traditionally, decision makers have only taken it when they are morally comfortable with that decision. It then documents how legislators in a range of common law jurisdictions have undermined the presumption of innocence, through measures such as reverse onus provisions, allowing or requiring inferences to be made against an accused, redefining offenses and defenses in novel ways to minimize the burden on the prosecutor, and by dressing proceedings as civil when they are in substance criminal. Courts have too easily acceded to such measures, in the process permitting accused persons to be convicted although there is reasonable doubt as to their guilt, and where they are not guilty of sufficiently blameworthy conduct to attract criminal sanction. It finds that the courts must be prepared to re-assert the prime importance of the presumption of innocence, only permitting criminal sanctions to be imposed where they are morally certain that the accused did that of which they have been accused, and morally comfortable that the conduct being addressed is worthy of the kind of criminal sanction which prosecutors seek to impose. Courts must be morally comfortable about the finding of guilt, and the imposition of the criminal penalty in a given case. They have lost sight of this moral underpinning to criminal law process and substance, and it must be regained.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book explains the historical significance and introduction of the presumption of innocence into common law legal systems. It explains that the presumption should be seen as reflecting notions of moral comfort around judgment of others. Specifically, when one is asked to make a judgment about the guilt or otherwise of a person accused of wrongdoing, the default position should be to do nothing. This reflects the very serious consequences of what we do when we decide someone is guilty of wrongdoing and is not a step to be taken lightly. Traditionally, decision makers have only taken it when they are morally comfortable with that decision. It then documents how legislators in a range of common law jurisdictions have undermined the presumption of innocence, through measures such as reverse onus provisions, allowing or requiring inferences to be made against an accused, redefining offenses and defenses in novel ways to minimize the burden on the prosecutor, and by dressing proceedings as civil when they are in substance criminal. Courts have too easily acceded to such measures, in the process permitting accused persons to be convicted although there is reasonable doubt as to their guilt, and where they are not guilty of sufficiently blameworthy conduct to attract criminal sanction. It finds that the courts must be prepared to re-assert the prime importance of the presumption of innocence, only permitting criminal sanctions to be imposed where they are morally certain that the accused did that of which they have been accused, and morally comfortable that the conduct being addressed is worthy of the kind of criminal sanction which prosecutors seek to impose. Courts must be morally comfortable about the finding of guilt, and the imposition of the criminal penalty in a given case. They have lost sight of this moral underpinning to criminal law process and substance, and it must be regained.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book New Perspectives on the Irish Abroad by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book From Disability Theory to Practice by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book Critical Childhood Studies and the Practice of Interdisciplinarity by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book Utilitarianism and Empire by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book The Monstrous Discourse in the Donald Trump Campaign by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book The Jarring Road to Democratic Inclusion by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book Marxist Theory, Black/African Specificities, and Racism by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book Lessons for Social Change in the Global Economy by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book Murder Stories by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book Representation and Institutional Design by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book Montesinos' Legacy by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book Political Communication in the Anglophone World by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book Cartographies of Transnationalism in Postcolonial Feminisms by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book Creating Japan's Ground Self-Defense Force, 1945–2015 by Anthony Gray
Cover of the book Secularism and the Crisis of Minority Identity in Postcolonial Literature by Anthony Gray
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy