Proportionality Balancing and Constitutional Governance

A Comparative and Global Approach

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, Foreign Legal Systems, Reference & Language, Law
Cover of the book Proportionality Balancing and Constitutional Governance by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews ISBN: 9780192578372
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: May 16, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
ISBN: 9780192578372
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: May 16, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

In this book, Alec Stone Sweet and Jud Mathews focus on the law and politics of rights protection in democracies, and in human rights regimes in Europe, the Americas, and Africa. After introducing the basic features of modern constitutions, with their emphasis on rights and judicial review, the authors present a theory of proportionality that explains why constitutional judges embraced it. Proportionality analysis is a highly intrusive mode of judicial supervision: it permits state officials to limit rights, but only when necessary to achieve a sufficiently important public interest. Since the 1950s, virtually every powerful domestic and international court has adopted proportionality analysis as the central method for protecting rights. In doing so, judges positioned themselves to review all important legislative and administrative decisions, and to invalidate them as unconstitutional when such policies fail the proportionality test. The result has been a massive - and global - transformation of law and politics. The book explicates the concepts of 'trusteeship', the 'system of constitutional justice', the 'effectiveness' of rights adjudication, and the 'zone of proportionality'. A wide range of case studies analyse: how proportionality has spread, and variation in how it is deployed; the extent to which the U.S. Supreme Court has evolved and resisted similar doctrines; the role of proportionality in building ongoing 'constitutional dialogues' with the other branches of government; and the importance of the principle to the courts of regional human rights regimes. While there is variance in the intensity of proportionality-based dialogues, such interactions are today at the very heart of governance in the modern constitutional state and beyond.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In this book, Alec Stone Sweet and Jud Mathews focus on the law and politics of rights protection in democracies, and in human rights regimes in Europe, the Americas, and Africa. After introducing the basic features of modern constitutions, with their emphasis on rights and judicial review, the authors present a theory of proportionality that explains why constitutional judges embraced it. Proportionality analysis is a highly intrusive mode of judicial supervision: it permits state officials to limit rights, but only when necessary to achieve a sufficiently important public interest. Since the 1950s, virtually every powerful domestic and international court has adopted proportionality analysis as the central method for protecting rights. In doing so, judges positioned themselves to review all important legislative and administrative decisions, and to invalidate them as unconstitutional when such policies fail the proportionality test. The result has been a massive - and global - transformation of law and politics. The book explicates the concepts of 'trusteeship', the 'system of constitutional justice', the 'effectiveness' of rights adjudication, and the 'zone of proportionality'. A wide range of case studies analyse: how proportionality has spread, and variation in how it is deployed; the extent to which the U.S. Supreme Court has evolved and resisted similar doctrines; the role of proportionality in building ongoing 'constitutional dialogues' with the other branches of government; and the importance of the principle to the courts of regional human rights regimes. While there is variance in the intensity of proportionality-based dialogues, such interactions are today at the very heart of governance in the modern constitutional state and beyond.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book By Steppe, Desert, and Ocean by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book Islam: A Very Short Introduction by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book The International Law of Property by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book Inspiration by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book The Liberalization of Transportation Services in the EU and Turkey by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book Scholarly Misconduct by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book Les Liaisons dangereuses by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book Dualities, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizational Life by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book Collins On Defamation by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book The Dawn of the Roman Empire by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book The Functions of Law by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book Annotated Companies Legislation by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book Knowing and Seeing by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book Not In Their Name by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
Cover of the book Financial Elites and European Banking by Alec Stone Sweet, Jud Mathews
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy