Reasons to Doubt

Wrongful Convictions and the Criminal Cases Review Commission

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Criminal Procedure, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science
Cover of the book Reasons to Doubt by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato ISBN: 9780192513434
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: January 10, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
ISBN: 9780192513434
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: January 10, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

This book reveals what happens to applications for post-conviction review when those in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland who believe they are wrongfully convicted apply to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, the only body that can refer a case back to the Court of Appeal once appellants opportunities for direct appeal are exhausted. While the Court is obliged to hear all such referrals, the Commission can only refer a case where it believes there is a real possibility that the Court will quash the conviction. The first empirical study of all stages of decision-making within the Commission, this book starts from the premise that the test applied by the Commission (the real possibility test) is not inflexible. Though created by statute and refined through case law, it must be determined on a case-by-case basis, drawing too on cultural and structural variables, alongside fresh evidence gathered by the Commission. Through in-depth analysis of case files and interviews, Hoyle and Sato scrutinize the Commissions operational practices, its working rules and assumptions, considering how these influence its understanding of the real possibility test. Situating their rich empirical data within a framework of the Commissions social, organizational, and legal contexts, this book demonstrates that in its open-ended investigations there is considerable scope for discretion; for thorough exploration of all possible avenues or for choosing a more superficial consideration of a case. It emerges that while structured internal guidance, drawing heavily on Court jurisprudence, shapes decision-making, creating consistency in approach, there remains some variability across cases, over time, that can be accounted for by the different professional backgrounds and personalities of Commission staff.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book reveals what happens to applications for post-conviction review when those in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland who believe they are wrongfully convicted apply to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, the only body that can refer a case back to the Court of Appeal once appellants opportunities for direct appeal are exhausted. While the Court is obliged to hear all such referrals, the Commission can only refer a case where it believes there is a real possibility that the Court will quash the conviction. The first empirical study of all stages of decision-making within the Commission, this book starts from the premise that the test applied by the Commission (the real possibility test) is not inflexible. Though created by statute and refined through case law, it must be determined on a case-by-case basis, drawing too on cultural and structural variables, alongside fresh evidence gathered by the Commission. Through in-depth analysis of case files and interviews, Hoyle and Sato scrutinize the Commissions operational practices, its working rules and assumptions, considering how these influence its understanding of the real possibility test. Situating their rich empirical data within a framework of the Commissions social, organizational, and legal contexts, this book demonstrates that in its open-ended investigations there is considerable scope for discretion; for thorough exploration of all possible avenues or for choosing a more superficial consideration of a case. It emerges that while structured internal guidance, drawing heavily on Court jurisprudence, shapes decision-making, creating consistency in approach, there remains some variability across cases, over time, that can be accounted for by the different professional backgrounds and personalities of Commission staff.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Does the Elephant Dance? by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book Modern Architecture: A Very Short Introduction by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book Advanced Respiratory Critical Care by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book Defending the Indefensible by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book The Castle by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book Global Governance from Regional Perspectives by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book Opening Strategy by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book The Oxford History of Anglicanism, Volume II by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book The Vampyre and Other Tales of the Macabre by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book Preparing to Pass the FRCA by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book Collins On Defamation by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book Anatomy for Dental Students by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
Cover of the book God and Cosmos in Stoicism by Carolyn Hoyle, Mai Sato
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy