Recent Criticism on the Book of Acts

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Bible & Bible Studies, Hermeneutics, New Testament, Criticism & Interpretation
Cover of the book Recent Criticism on the Book of Acts by J. Gresham Machen, CrossReach Publications
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: J. Gresham Machen ISBN: 1230001988567
Publisher: CrossReach Publications Publication: November 3, 2017
Imprint: Language: English
Author: J. Gresham Machen
ISBN: 1230001988567
Publisher: CrossReach Publications
Publication: November 3, 2017
Imprint:
Language: English

Some years ago the world of New Testament scholarship was startled by the conversion of Adolf von Harnack[1] to the traditional view of the authorship of Luke-Acts. The book of Acts, Harnack concluded, was actually written by Luke, a companion of Paul. And what is more, it was written at about A.D. 60, or a little later, near the point of time where the narrative breaks off. Thus with regard to the date of the book the leading representative of modern “liberalism” had become more conservative than most of the “conservatives” themselves. Well might students of the New Testament ask, “Is Saul also among the prophets?”

Perhaps the most distinctive contribution of Harnack to the argument for the Lucan authorship of Acts was his establishment of the linguistic and stylistic unity of the book. The “we-sections”—the sections where the first person plural appears—are generally admitted to have been written by a companion of Paul. But as Harnack showed with especial clearness the we-sections are strikingly similar in language and style to the rest of the book. If, therefore, the book as a whole was written or compiled by an author different from the author of the we-sections, this author of the whole must at least have revised the we-section source which he was using, so as to impress upon it his own style. But if so, why did he not change the “we” to “they”? As coming from the pen of a later writer, who as everyone knew could not have been an eye-witness of the missionary journeys of Paul, the “we” was rank nonsense. It could only have been retained if the final author was a mere compiler, copying out his sources mechanically. But that the final author was not a mere compiler is proved by the literary unity of the book. If, therefore, the final author was in the we-sections using a source written by some one else, he has revised everything in his source except the one thing, the “we”, which most imperatively required revision.

 

[1] Lukas der Arzt, 1906; Die Apostelgeschichte, 1908; Neue Untersuchungen sur Apostelgeschichte imd zur Abfassiingszeit der synoptischen Evangelien, 1911.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Some years ago the world of New Testament scholarship was startled by the conversion of Adolf von Harnack[1] to the traditional view of the authorship of Luke-Acts. The book of Acts, Harnack concluded, was actually written by Luke, a companion of Paul. And what is more, it was written at about A.D. 60, or a little later, near the point of time where the narrative breaks off. Thus with regard to the date of the book the leading representative of modern “liberalism” had become more conservative than most of the “conservatives” themselves. Well might students of the New Testament ask, “Is Saul also among the prophets?”

Perhaps the most distinctive contribution of Harnack to the argument for the Lucan authorship of Acts was his establishment of the linguistic and stylistic unity of the book. The “we-sections”—the sections where the first person plural appears—are generally admitted to have been written by a companion of Paul. But as Harnack showed with especial clearness the we-sections are strikingly similar in language and style to the rest of the book. If, therefore, the book as a whole was written or compiled by an author different from the author of the we-sections, this author of the whole must at least have revised the we-section source which he was using, so as to impress upon it his own style. But if so, why did he not change the “we” to “they”? As coming from the pen of a later writer, who as everyone knew could not have been an eye-witness of the missionary journeys of Paul, the “we” was rank nonsense. It could only have been retained if the final author was a mere compiler, copying out his sources mechanically. But that the final author was not a mere compiler is proved by the literary unity of the book. If, therefore, the final author was in the we-sections using a source written by some one else, he has revised everything in his source except the one thing, the “we”, which most imperatively required revision.

 

[1] Lukas der Arzt, 1906; Die Apostelgeschichte, 1908; Neue Untersuchungen sur Apostelgeschichte imd zur Abfassiingszeit der synoptischen Evangelien, 1911.

More books from CrossReach Publications

Cover of the book Addresses on the Gospel of Luke by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book Final Perseverance by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book The Supper of the Lord by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book Earth’s Morning by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book Twelve Select Sermons by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book The Works of President Edwards Volume II by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book The Teaching of the So-called Plymouth Brethren by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book Notes on the Prophecy of Malachi by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book Buchmanism by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book Divine Priorities by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book The Life and Letters of F. J. A. Hort by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book Not Wrath But Rapture by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book The Anabaptists by J. Gresham Machen
Cover of the book Por Que Deus Usou D. L. Moody by J. Gresham Machen
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy