Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics

Hope, Compassion, and Animal Welfare

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Modern, Ethics & Moral Philosophy
Cover of the book Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Ethics by Sandra Shapshay, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Sandra Shapshay ISBN: 9780190906825
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: December 3, 2018
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Sandra Shapshay
ISBN: 9780190906825
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: December 3, 2018
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

At the apex of his influence, from about 1860 up to the start of World War I, Schopenhauer was known first and foremost as a philosopher of pessimism. Still today, his main reputation is as one of the few philosophers to have argued that it would have been better never to have been. Sandra Shapshay aims to complicate and challenge this predominant picture of Schopenhauer's ethical thought, arguing that while the pessimistic, resigned Schopenhauer represents one side of the thinker, there is another, more hopeful side that is equally important to his legacy and essential to fully understanding his philosophy. Schopenhauer's ethical thought contains a hopeful, progressive strand, and the main task of this book is to reconstruct it. The resulting position, which Shapshay terms "compassionate moral realism," offers a hybrid Kantian moral realist/sentimentalist theory and a Schopenhauerian value ontology of degrees of inherent value. The reconstruction is novel in three main ways. First, it views Schopenhauer as a more faithful Kantian than most commentators have been apt to recognize. Second, it sees Schopenhauer's philosophy as an evolving rather than static body of thought, especially with respect to the place of the Platonic Ideas in his system; Schopenhauer's views in the philosophy of nature changed as he encountered proto-Darwinian thought, and this change weakens Schopenhauer's own grounds for pessimism. A third novelty is the claim, concerning his ethical thought, that there are really two Schopenhauers rather than one: the "Knight of Despair" and the "Knight of Hope" distinction introduced in this book helps to capture the incompatibility between the resignationist and the compassionate moral realist sides of Schopenhauer's ethical thought.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

At the apex of his influence, from about 1860 up to the start of World War I, Schopenhauer was known first and foremost as a philosopher of pessimism. Still today, his main reputation is as one of the few philosophers to have argued that it would have been better never to have been. Sandra Shapshay aims to complicate and challenge this predominant picture of Schopenhauer's ethical thought, arguing that while the pessimistic, resigned Schopenhauer represents one side of the thinker, there is another, more hopeful side that is equally important to his legacy and essential to fully understanding his philosophy. Schopenhauer's ethical thought contains a hopeful, progressive strand, and the main task of this book is to reconstruct it. The resulting position, which Shapshay terms "compassionate moral realism," offers a hybrid Kantian moral realist/sentimentalist theory and a Schopenhauerian value ontology of degrees of inherent value. The reconstruction is novel in three main ways. First, it views Schopenhauer as a more faithful Kantian than most commentators have been apt to recognize. Second, it sees Schopenhauer's philosophy as an evolving rather than static body of thought, especially with respect to the place of the Platonic Ideas in his system; Schopenhauer's views in the philosophy of nature changed as he encountered proto-Darwinian thought, and this change weakens Schopenhauer's own grounds for pessimism. A third novelty is the claim, concerning his ethical thought, that there are really two Schopenhauers rather than one: the "Knight of Despair" and the "Knight of Hope" distinction introduced in this book helps to capture the incompatibility between the resignationist and the compassionate moral realist sides of Schopenhauer's ethical thought.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book John Birch by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book Living with Mild Cognitive Impairment:A Guide to Maximizing Brain Health and Reducing Risk of Dementia by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book Mind-Society by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book Integrative Women's Health by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book Mercy, Mercy Me by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book In Search of Madness by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book Eternity by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book On Sympathetic Grounds by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book Mastering Your Adult ADHD by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book Making Sense in Psychology by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book Psychosocial Framework: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book Intellectual Property: A Very Short Introduction by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book The Yom Kippur War by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Warfare in the Classical World by Sandra Shapshay
Cover of the book The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat by Sandra Shapshay
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy