Reevaluation Of Pemberton At Vicksburg

Nonfiction, History, Modern, 19th Century, Americas, United States, Civil War Period (1850-1877), Military
Cover of the book Reevaluation Of Pemberton At Vicksburg by Major Malcolm G. Haynes, Golden Springs Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Major Malcolm G. Haynes ISBN: 9781786253002
Publisher: Golden Springs Publishing Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Golden Springs Publishing Language: English
Author: Major Malcolm G. Haynes
ISBN: 9781786253002
Publisher: Golden Springs Publishing
Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Golden Springs Publishing
Language: English

Historians have largely agreed that Pemberton should shoulder the blame for the poor Confederate performance during the Vicksburg campaign. General consensus exists among American Civil War historians that Pemberton proved a confused, indecisive, and incompetent commander and his poor leadership led to the Confederate defeat. However, an examination of the Vicksburg campaign conducted at the operational level of war shows that throughout the campaign, Pemberton led a capable and competent defense not just of Vicksburg, but of the Mississippi Department he commanded. He relied on an operational approach that involved fighting from prepared defensive positions in favorable terrain deep in his own territory and anchored by natural obstacles. To attack such a position, Pemberton knew an opponent would need a large force operating over an extended line of communications (LOC). Pemberton intended to interdict his opponent’s LOC using a strong cavalry force, thus preventing the enemy from achieving the offensive momentum necessary to break through Vicksburg’s defenses. This was a sound operational approach. However, it failed because of an ineffective Confederate command structure that, among other failures, denied Pemberton the resources, particularly adequate cavalry forces, required to implement his operational approach.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Historians have largely agreed that Pemberton should shoulder the blame for the poor Confederate performance during the Vicksburg campaign. General consensus exists among American Civil War historians that Pemberton proved a confused, indecisive, and incompetent commander and his poor leadership led to the Confederate defeat. However, an examination of the Vicksburg campaign conducted at the operational level of war shows that throughout the campaign, Pemberton led a capable and competent defense not just of Vicksburg, but of the Mississippi Department he commanded. He relied on an operational approach that involved fighting from prepared defensive positions in favorable terrain deep in his own territory and anchored by natural obstacles. To attack such a position, Pemberton knew an opponent would need a large force operating over an extended line of communications (LOC). Pemberton intended to interdict his opponent’s LOC using a strong cavalry force, thus preventing the enemy from achieving the offensive momentum necessary to break through Vicksburg’s defenses. This was a sound operational approach. However, it failed because of an ineffective Confederate command structure that, among other failures, denied Pemberton the resources, particularly adequate cavalry forces, required to implement his operational approach.

More books from Golden Springs Publishing

Cover of the book Fredericksburg Staff Ride: Briefing Book [Illustrated Edition] by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Training Thoroughbred Horses by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Balloons Of The Civil War by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Ideology And The Fall Of Empires: The Decline Of The Spanish Empire And Its Comparison To Current American Strategy by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Jackie Robinson: My Own Story by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book His Indian Brother by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Disloyalty In The Confederacy by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Nine Men In Gray by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Waterloo And Gettysburg: A Campaign Comparison by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book A Yankee Saint by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Lone Star Marine by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book The Year Of Decision: 1846 by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Three Months In The Southern States: The 1863 War Diary Of An English Soldier: April-June 1863 [Illustrated Edition] by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Reminiscences of Big I by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Reminiscences Of The Civil War by Theodore M. Nagle, formerly sergeant Company “C,” 21st Regiment, N.Y.S. Vol. Inf. by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy