Religion, Science, and Democracy

A Disputational Friendship

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Christianity, Church, Church & State, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Democracy
Cover of the book Religion, Science, and Democracy by Lisa L. Stenmark, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Lisa L. Stenmark ISBN: 9780739142882
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: March 8, 2013
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Lisa L. Stenmark
ISBN: 9780739142882
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: March 8, 2013
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

Despite the increasing popularity of “religion and science” as an academic discourse, the intersection of science and religion remains a front line in an ongoing “culture war.” The reasons for this lie in an approach to discourse that closely resembles the model of discourse promoted by John Rawls, in which plural discourse —such as between religion and science— is based on a foundation of shared beliefs and established facts. This leads to a “doctrines and discoveries” approach to the relationship of religion and science, which focuses on their respective truth claims in an attempt to find areas of agreement. This framework inherently privileges scientific perspectives, which actually increases conflict between religion and science, and undermines public discourse by inserting absolutes into it. To the extent that the science and religion discourse adopts this approach, it inadvertently increases the conflict between religion and science and limits our ability to address matters of public concern.

This book suggests an alternative model for discourse, a disputational friendship, based on the work of Hannah Arendt. This approach recognizes the role that authorities —and thus religion and science— play in public life, but undermines any attempt to privilege a particular authority, because it promotes the position of the storyteller, who never settles on a single story but always seeks to incorporate many particular stories into her account. A disputational friendship promotes storytelling not by seeking agreement, but by exploring areas of disagreement in order to create the space for more conversations and to generate more stories and additional interpretations. Successful discourse between religion and science is not measured by its ability to determine “truth” or “fact,” but by its ability to continually expand the discourse and promote public life and public judgment.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Despite the increasing popularity of “religion and science” as an academic discourse, the intersection of science and religion remains a front line in an ongoing “culture war.” The reasons for this lie in an approach to discourse that closely resembles the model of discourse promoted by John Rawls, in which plural discourse —such as between religion and science— is based on a foundation of shared beliefs and established facts. This leads to a “doctrines and discoveries” approach to the relationship of religion and science, which focuses on their respective truth claims in an attempt to find areas of agreement. This framework inherently privileges scientific perspectives, which actually increases conflict between religion and science, and undermines public discourse by inserting absolutes into it. To the extent that the science and religion discourse adopts this approach, it inadvertently increases the conflict between religion and science and limits our ability to address matters of public concern.

This book suggests an alternative model for discourse, a disputational friendship, based on the work of Hannah Arendt. This approach recognizes the role that authorities —and thus religion and science— play in public life, but undermines any attempt to privilege a particular authority, because it promotes the position of the storyteller, who never settles on a single story but always seeks to incorporate many particular stories into her account. A disputational friendship promotes storytelling not by seeking agreement, but by exploring areas of disagreement in order to create the space for more conversations and to generate more stories and additional interpretations. Successful discourse between religion and science is not measured by its ability to determine “truth” or “fact,” but by its ability to continually expand the discourse and promote public life and public judgment.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book The First Great Political Realist by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Women as Essential Citizens in the Czech National Movement by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Augustine and Kierkegaard by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Andreas Werckmeister’s Musicalische Paradoxal-Discourse by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Political Election Debates by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Walk Away by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book The Anthropology of Complex Economic Systems by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Shape-Shifting Capital by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Souls with Longing by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Conflict, Mediated Message, and Group Dynamics by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book The Daily Show and Rhetoric by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Anglophone-Cameroon Literature by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Ideology and Utopia in the Twenty-First Century by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Soul, World, and Idea by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book The Monstrous Discourse in the Donald Trump Campaign by Lisa L. Stenmark
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy