Representing the Poor: Legal Advocacy and Welfare Reform During Reagan's Gubernatorial Years

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Legal Services, Legal History
Cover of the book Representing the Poor: Legal Advocacy and Welfare Reform During Reagan's Gubernatorial Years by Mark N. Aaronson, Quid Pro, LLC
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Mark N. Aaronson ISBN: 9781610278621
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC Publication: April 22, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Mark N. Aaronson
ISBN: 9781610278621
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC
Publication: April 22, 2014
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

The empirical focus of this book is the contentious political and legal battle over California welfare reform in the early 1970s. It is an extended, multifaceted case study of a kind not much found in the literature on social cause lawyering. The narrative highlights the forceful presence of Ronald Reagan and the pivotal role in representing the welfare poor carried out by Ralph Santiago Abascal, a government-funded legal aid attorney. To counter Reagan’s welfare policy ambitions, Abascal with other legal services lawyers, and in joint cause with recipient-led welfare rights organizations, relied on court litigation not in isolation but as part of an overall strategy that also involved legislative and administrative actions. Within the context of American pluralism and constitutionalism and from an analytical perspective, this study examines the professional and institutional character of group legal representation for the poor as a strategy for political empowerment and social change. While grounded in political and legal history, the study’s conceptual approaches primarily draw on ideas from political science and political theory about representation and from writings in legal ethics and legal education on professional role responsibilities. The principal thematic points are: (1) Social cause lawyering is a systemic necessity for the democratic and equitable functioning of our governing institutions; (2) the client constraints on the role of lawyers for groups or causes have more to do conceptually with understandings about the nature of representation than the applicability of ethical or procedural rules; and (3) the political consequences of such legal advocacy are variable and potentially contradictory.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The empirical focus of this book is the contentious political and legal battle over California welfare reform in the early 1970s. It is an extended, multifaceted case study of a kind not much found in the literature on social cause lawyering. The narrative highlights the forceful presence of Ronald Reagan and the pivotal role in representing the welfare poor carried out by Ralph Santiago Abascal, a government-funded legal aid attorney. To counter Reagan’s welfare policy ambitions, Abascal with other legal services lawyers, and in joint cause with recipient-led welfare rights organizations, relied on court litigation not in isolation but as part of an overall strategy that also involved legislative and administrative actions. Within the context of American pluralism and constitutionalism and from an analytical perspective, this study examines the professional and institutional character of group legal representation for the poor as a strategy for political empowerment and social change. While grounded in political and legal history, the study’s conceptual approaches primarily draw on ideas from political science and political theory about representation and from writings in legal ethics and legal education on professional role responsibilities. The principal thematic points are: (1) Social cause lawyering is a systemic necessity for the democratic and equitable functioning of our governing institutions; (2) the client constraints on the role of lawyers for groups or causes have more to do conceptually with understandings about the nature of representation than the applicability of ethical or procedural rules; and (3) the political consequences of such legal advocacy are variable and potentially contradictory.

More books from Quid Pro, LLC

Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 3 - January 2017 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Law in a New Key: Essays on Law and Society by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 3 - March 2012 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book The Aeneid: Virgil's Greatest Hits [Abridged and Annotated] by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Adversarialism and Consensus? The Professions’ Construction of Solicitor and Family Mediator Identity and Role by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book University of Chicago Law Review: Volume 80, Number 3 - Summer 2013 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 123, Number 1 - October 2013 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Sociological Theory: A Contemporary View: How to Read, Criticize and Do Theory by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Securing Religious Liberty: Principles for Judicial Interpretation of the Religion Clauses by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 122, Number 1 - October 2012 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Boats Against the Current by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book The Changing Academic Market: General Trends and a Berkeley Case Study by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 125, Number 5 - March 2012 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book Hot Topics in the Legal Profession: 2017 by Mark N. Aaronson
Cover of the book The Emerald Rose: A Courtroom Novel by Mark N. Aaronson
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy