Rethinking Legal Scholarship

A Transatlantic Dialogue

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Jurisprudence, International
Cover of the book Rethinking Legal Scholarship by , Cambridge University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9781316760239
Publisher: Cambridge University Press Publication: February 2, 2017
Imprint: Cambridge University Press Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9781316760239
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication: February 2, 2017
Imprint: Cambridge University Press
Language: English

Although American scholars sometimes consider European legal scholarship as old-fashioned and inward-looking and Europeans often perceive American legal scholarship as amateur social science, both traditions share a joint challenge. If legal scholarship becomes too much separated from practice, legal scholars will ultimately make themselves superfluous. If legal scholars, on the other hand, cannot explain to other disciplines what is academic about their research, which methodologies are typical, and what separates proper research from mediocre or poor research, they will probably end up in a similar situation. Therefore we need a debate on what unites legal academics on both sides of the Atlantic. Should legal scholarship aspire to the status of a science and gradually adopt more and more of the methods, (quality) standards, and practices of other (social) sciences? What sort of methods do we need to study law in its social context and how should legal scholarship deal with the challenges posed by globalization?

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Although American scholars sometimes consider European legal scholarship as old-fashioned and inward-looking and Europeans often perceive American legal scholarship as amateur social science, both traditions share a joint challenge. If legal scholarship becomes too much separated from practice, legal scholars will ultimately make themselves superfluous. If legal scholars, on the other hand, cannot explain to other disciplines what is academic about their research, which methodologies are typical, and what separates proper research from mediocre or poor research, they will probably end up in a similar situation. Therefore we need a debate on what unites legal academics on both sides of the Atlantic. Should legal scholarship aspire to the status of a science and gradually adopt more and more of the methods, (quality) standards, and practices of other (social) sciences? What sort of methods do we need to study law in its social context and how should legal scholarship deal with the challenges posed by globalization?

More books from Cambridge University Press

Cover of the book Dilemmas by
Cover of the book Using Korean by
Cover of the book Imagining Medieval English by
Cover of the book The Human Rights-Based Approach to Carbon Finance by
Cover of the book The Civilianization of War by
Cover of the book The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments by
Cover of the book Buddhist Funeral Cultures of Southeast Asia and China by
Cover of the book Instantons and Large N by
Cover of the book The Real Chimpanzee by
Cover of the book Destiny or Chance Revisited by
Cover of the book Defending the Correspondence Theory of Truth by
Cover of the book Democratic Dynasties by
Cover of the book Applied Conic Finance by
Cover of the book Buried by the Times by
Cover of the book Judgment under Uncertainty by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy