Rutgers v. Waddington

Alexander Hamilton, the End of the War for Independence, and the Origins of Judicial Review

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Constitutional, History, Americas, United States, 19th Century, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government
Cover of the book Rutgers v. Waddington by Peter Charles Hoffer, University Press of Kansas
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Peter Charles Hoffer ISBN: 9780700622061
Publisher: University Press of Kansas Publication: February 12, 2016
Imprint: University Press of Kansas Language: English
Author: Peter Charles Hoffer
ISBN: 9780700622061
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
Publication: February 12, 2016
Imprint: University Press of Kansas
Language: English

Once the dust of the Revolution settled, the problem of reconciling the erstwhile warring factions arose, and as is often the case in the aftermath of violent revolutions, the matter made its way into the legal arena. Rutgers v. Waddington was such a case. Through this little-known but remarkable dispute over back rent for a burned-down brewery, Peter Charles Hoffer recounts a tale of political and constitutional intrigue involving some of the most important actors in America’s transition from a confederation of states under the Articles of Confederation to a national republic under the U.S. Constitution.

At the end of the Revolution, the widow Rutgers and her sons returned to the brewery they’d abandoned when the British had occupied New York. They demanded rent from Waddington, the loyalist who had rented the facility under the British occupation. Under a punitive New York state law, the loyalist Waddington was liable. But the peace treaty’s provisions protecting loyalists’ property rights said otherwise. Appearing for the defendants was war veteran, future Federalist, and first secretary of the treasury, Alexander Hamilton. And, as always, lurking in the background was the estimable Aaron Burr. As Hoffer details Hamilton's arguments for the supremacy of treaty law over state law, the significance of Rutgers v. Waddington in the development of a strong central government emerges clearly—as does the role of the courts in bridging the young nation’s divisions in the Revolution’s wake.

Rutgers v. Waddington illustrates a foundational moment in American history. As such, it is an encapsulation of a society riven by war, buffeted by revolutionary change attempting to piece together the true meaning of, in John Adams’ formulation, “rule by law, and not by men.”

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Once the dust of the Revolution settled, the problem of reconciling the erstwhile warring factions arose, and as is often the case in the aftermath of violent revolutions, the matter made its way into the legal arena. Rutgers v. Waddington was such a case. Through this little-known but remarkable dispute over back rent for a burned-down brewery, Peter Charles Hoffer recounts a tale of political and constitutional intrigue involving some of the most important actors in America’s transition from a confederation of states under the Articles of Confederation to a national republic under the U.S. Constitution.

At the end of the Revolution, the widow Rutgers and her sons returned to the brewery they’d abandoned when the British had occupied New York. They demanded rent from Waddington, the loyalist who had rented the facility under the British occupation. Under a punitive New York state law, the loyalist Waddington was liable. But the peace treaty’s provisions protecting loyalists’ property rights said otherwise. Appearing for the defendants was war veteran, future Federalist, and first secretary of the treasury, Alexander Hamilton. And, as always, lurking in the background was the estimable Aaron Burr. As Hoffer details Hamilton's arguments for the supremacy of treaty law over state law, the significance of Rutgers v. Waddington in the development of a strong central government emerges clearly—as does the role of the courts in bridging the young nation’s divisions in the Revolution’s wake.

Rutgers v. Waddington illustrates a foundational moment in American history. As such, it is an encapsulation of a society riven by war, buffeted by revolutionary change attempting to piece together the true meaning of, in John Adams’ formulation, “rule by law, and not by men.”

More books from University Press of Kansas

Cover of the book Resilient America by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book Native Activism in Cold War America by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book Federal Ecosystem Management by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book Democratic Religion from Locke to Obama by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book Antonin Scalia's Jurisprudence by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book Traumatic Defeat by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book The Rise of Gridiron University by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book The Presidency of George H. W. Bush by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book Stopped at Stalingrad by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book Truman's Triumphs by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book Secrecy in the Sunshine Era by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book The Ballad of Ben and Stella Mae by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book Parchment Barriers by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book Lizzie Borden on Trial by Peter Charles Hoffer
Cover of the book The One-Party Presidential Contest by Peter Charles Hoffer
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy