Symbolic Legislation Theory and Developments in Biolaw

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Reference, Science & Nature, Science, Biological Sciences, Biology
Cover of the book Symbolic Legislation Theory and Developments in Biolaw by , Springer International Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9783319333656
Publisher: Springer International Publishing Publication: August 31, 2016
Imprint: Springer Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9783319333656
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Publication: August 31, 2016
Imprint: Springer
Language: English

This edited volume covers new ground by bringing together perspectives from symbolic legislation theory on the one hand, and from biolaw and bioethics on the other hand.

Symbolic legislation has a bad name. It usually refers to instances of legislation which are ineffective and that serve other political and social goals than the goals officially stated. Recently, a more positive notion of symbolic legislation has emerged in legislative theory. From this perspective, symbolic legislation is regarded as a positive alternative to the more traditional, top-down legislative approach. The legislature no longer merely issues commands backed up with severe sanctions, as in instrumental legislation. Instead, lawmakers provide open and aspirational norms that are meant to change behavior not by means of threat, but indirectly, through debate and social interaction.

Since the 1990s, biomedical developments have revived discussions on symbolic legislation. One of the reasons is that biomedical legislation touches on deep-rooted, symbolic-cultural representations of the biological aspects of human life. Moreover, as it is often impossible to reach consensus on these controversial questions, legislators have sought alternative ways to develop legal frameworks. Consequently, communicative and interactive approaches to legislation are prominent within the governance of medical biotechnology.

The symbolic dimensions of biolaw are often overlooked. Yet, it is clear that the symbolic is at the heart of many legal-political debates on bioethical questions. Since the rise of biomedical technologies, human body materials have acquired a scientific, medical and even commercial value. These new approaches, which radically question existing legal symbolizations of the human body, raise the question whether and how the law should continue to reflect symbolic values and meanings. Moreover, how can we decide what these symbolic values are, given the fact that we live in a pluralistic society?

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This edited volume covers new ground by bringing together perspectives from symbolic legislation theory on the one hand, and from biolaw and bioethics on the other hand.

Symbolic legislation has a bad name. It usually refers to instances of legislation which are ineffective and that serve other political and social goals than the goals officially stated. Recently, a more positive notion of symbolic legislation has emerged in legislative theory. From this perspective, symbolic legislation is regarded as a positive alternative to the more traditional, top-down legislative approach. The legislature no longer merely issues commands backed up with severe sanctions, as in instrumental legislation. Instead, lawmakers provide open and aspirational norms that are meant to change behavior not by means of threat, but indirectly, through debate and social interaction.

Since the 1990s, biomedical developments have revived discussions on symbolic legislation. One of the reasons is that biomedical legislation touches on deep-rooted, symbolic-cultural representations of the biological aspects of human life. Moreover, as it is often impossible to reach consensus on these controversial questions, legislators have sought alternative ways to develop legal frameworks. Consequently, communicative and interactive approaches to legislation are prominent within the governance of medical biotechnology.

The symbolic dimensions of biolaw are often overlooked. Yet, it is clear that the symbolic is at the heart of many legal-political debates on bioethical questions. Since the rise of biomedical technologies, human body materials have acquired a scientific, medical and even commercial value. These new approaches, which radically question existing legal symbolizations of the human body, raise the question whether and how the law should continue to reflect symbolic values and meanings. Moreover, how can we decide what these symbolic values are, given the fact that we live in a pluralistic society?

More books from Springer International Publishing

Cover of the book Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2017 by
Cover of the book Empirical Philosophical Investigations in Education and Embodied Experience by
Cover of the book Periodizing Capitalism and Capitalist Extinction by
Cover of the book Introduction to Quasi-Monte Carlo Integration and Applications by
Cover of the book Digital Activism in the Social Media Era by
Cover of the book Communities of Practice: Art, Play, and Aesthetics in Early Childhood by
Cover of the book Energy Performance of Buildings by
Cover of the book Industrial Applications of Holonic and Multi-Agent Systems by
Cover of the book The Linear Model and Hypothesis by
Cover of the book EU Internet Law by
Cover of the book Starry Reckoning: Reference and Analysis in Mathematics and Cosmology by
Cover of the book Non-equilibrium Evaporation and Condensation Processes by
Cover of the book Intimacies, Citizenship and Refugee Men by
Cover of the book Advances in Soft Computing by
Cover of the book The Impact of Information on Modern Humans by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy